Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Statistics
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login

Automatic vigilance for negative words is categorical and general

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Estes, Zachary, 1973- and Adelman, James S. . (2008) Automatic vigilance for negative words is categorical and general. Emotion, Vol.8 (No.4). pp. 453-457. ISSN 1528-3542

[img]
Preview
PDF
WRAP_Estes_Estes__Adelman_Reply_2.pdf - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader

Download (1783Kb)
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0012887

Abstract

With other factors controlled, negative words elicit slower lexical decisions and naming than positive words (Estes & Adelman, 2008; see record 2008-09984-001). Moreover, this marked difference in responding to negative words and to positive words (i.e., between-category discontinuity) was accompanied by relatively uniform responding among negative words (i.e., within-category equivalence), thus suggesting a categorical model of automatic vigilance. Larsen, Mercer, Balota, and Strube (this issue; see record 2008-09984-002) corroborated our observation that valence predicts lexical decision and word naming latencies. However, on the basis of an interaction between linear arousal and linear valence, they claim that automatic vigilance does not occur among arousing stimuli and they purport to reject the categorical model. Here we show that (a) this interaction is logically irrelevant to whether automatic vigilance is categorical; (b) the linear interaction is statistically consistent with the categorical model; (c) the interaction is not observed within the categorical model; and (d) despite having 5 fewer parameters, the categorical model predicts word recognition times as well as the interaction model. Thus, automatic vigilance is categorical and generalizes across levels of arousal

Item Type: Journal Article
Subjects: B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology
Divisions: Faculty of Science > Psychology
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): Lexical grammar, Dependency grammar, Perception -- Research
Journal or Publication Title: Emotion
Publisher: American Psychological Association
ISSN: 1528-3542
Date: August 2008
Volume: Vol.8
Number: No.4
Page Range: pp. 453-457
Identification Number: 10.1037/a0012887
Status: Peer Reviewed
Access rights to Published version: Open Access
References: Algom, D., Chajut, E., & Lev, S. (2004). A rational look at the emotional Stroop phenomenon: A generic slowdown, not a Stroop effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133, 323-338. Balota, D. A., Cortese, M. J., Hutchison, K. A., Neely, J. H., Nelson, D., Simpson, G. B., & Treiman, R. (2002). The English Lexicon Project: A Web-based repository of descriptive and behavioral measures for 40,481 English words and non-words. Available at http://elexicon.wustl.edu. Balota, D. A., Cortese, M. J., Sergent-Marshall, S. D., Spieler, D. H., & Yap, M. J. (2004). Visual word recognition of single-syllable words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133, 283-316. Bimler, D. & Kirkland, J. (2001). Categorical perception of facial expressions of emotion: Evidence from multidimensional scaling. Cognition & Emotion, 15, 633-658. Bradley, M. M. & Lang, P. J. (1999a). Affective norms for English words (ANEW): Instruction manual and affective ratings. Technical Report C-1, The Center for Research in Psychophysiology, University of Florida. Bradley, M. M. & Lang, P. J. (1999b). Fearfulness and affective evaluations of pictures. Motivation and Emotion, 23, 1-13. Burgess, C. (1998). From simple associations to the building blocks of language: Modeling meaning in memory with the HAL model. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 30, 188-198. Estes, Z. & Adelman, J. S. (this issue). Automatic vigilance for negative words in lexical decision and naming: Comment on Larsen, Mercer, and Balota (2006). Emotion. Etcoff, N. L. & Magee, J. J. (1992). Categorical perception of facial expressions. Cognition, 44, 227-240. Fazio, R. H. (2001). On the automatic activation of associated evaluations: An overview. Cognition & Emotion, 15, 115-141. Fox, E., Russo, R., Bowles, R., & Dutton, K. (2001). Do threatening stimuli draw or hold visual attention in subclinical anxiety? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130, 681-700. Horstmann, G., Scharlau, I., & Ansorge, U. (2006). More efficient rejection of happy than of angry face distractors in visual search. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 1067-1073. Juslin, P. N., & Laukka, P. (2003). Communication of emotions in vocal expression and music performance: Different channels, same code? Psychological Bulletin, 129, 770-814. Klauer, K. C. & Musch, J. (2003). Affective priming: Findings and theories. In J. Musch & K. C. Klauer (Eds.), The Psychology of Evaluation (pp. 7-49). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Larsen, R. J., Mercer, K. A., & Balota, D. A. (2006). Lexical characteristics of words used in emotional Stroop experiments. Emotion, 6, 62-72. Larsen, R. J., Mercer, K. A., Balota, D. A., & Strube, M. J. (this issue). Not all negative words slow down lexical decision and naming speed: Response to Estes and Adelman. Emotion. Laukka, P. (2005). Categorical perception of vocal emotion expressions. Emotion, 5, 277-295. Lavender, T., & Hommel, B. (2007). Affect and action: Towards an event-coding account. Cognition and Emotion, 21, 1270-1296. Lazarus, R. S. (1982). Thoughts on the relationship between emotion and cognition. American Psychologist, 37, 1019-1024. McKenna, F. P., & Sharma, D. (2004). Reversing the emotional Stroop effect reveals that it is not what it seems: The role of fast and slow components. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30, 382-392. Neumann, R., Forster, J. & Strack, F. (2003). Motor compatibility: The bidirectional link between behavior and evaluation. In J. Musch & K. C. Klauer (Eds.), The Psychology of Evaluation (pp. 371-391). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Pratto, F. & John, O. P. (1991). Automatic vigilance: The attention-grabbing power of negative social information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 380-391. Voyer, D., Voyer, S., & Bryden, M. P. (1995). Magnitude of sex differences in spatial abilities: A meta-analysis and consideration of critical variables. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 250-270. Wentura, D., Rothermund, K., & Bak, P. (2000). Automatic vigilance: The attention-grabbing power of approach- and avoidance-related social information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 1024-1037. Young, A. W., Rowland, D., Calder, A. J., & Etcoff, N. L. (1997). Facial expression megamix: Tests of dimensional and category accounts of emotion recognition. Cognition, 63, 271-313. Zajonc, R. B. (1980). Feeling and thinking: Preferences need no inferences. American Psychologist, 35, 151-175.
URI: http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/374

Data sourced from Thomson Reuters' Web of Knowledge

Request changes to a record

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Document Downloads

More statistics for this item...
twitter

Email us: publications@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us