A case study of the development of WebPA : an online peer-moderated marking tool
Loddington, Steve, Pond, Keith, Wilkinson, Nicola and Willmot, Peter. (2009) A case study of the development of WebPA : an online peer-moderated marking tool. British Journal of Educational Technology, Vol.40 (No.2). pp. 329-341. ISSN 0007-1013Full text not available from this repository.
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2008.00922.x
Peer moderation of group work in higher education is rapidly advancing through the use of technological developments and is increasingly being informed by pedagogical research. The highly successful WebPA online assessment system has gone through a number of development phases over its 15-year history and has now evolved into a relatively mature and flexible tool for facilitating group work. This paper presents a case study of the approaches that have been used in the system's development from the technical perspective, and describes how the scope of the project has massively expanded and that the development has been continually backed by a sound and wide-ranging pedagogy. The benefits of using the online system are shown to be underpinned throughout by examples of good practice in the supervision of academic group work. A critical evaluation of the tool and surrounding pedagogical practices highlight future areas for technical expansion.
|Item Type:||Journal Article|
|Subjects:||L Education > LB Theory and practice of education
T Technology > T Technology (General)
|Divisions:||Faculty of Social Sciences > Institute of Education|
|Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH):||Group work in education -- Case studies, Grading and marking (Students) -- Technological innovations -- Case studies, Educational technology -- Case studies, Educational innovations -- Case studies|
|Journal or Publication Title:||British Journal of Educational Technology|
|Publisher:||Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd.|
|Page Range:||pp. 329-341|
|Access rights to Published version:||Restricted or Subscription Access|
|References:||Blease, D. (2006). Group and team work guide. Retrieved August 12, 2008, from http:// www.lboro.ac.uk/service/pd/gw/page_01.htm Cheng,W. &Warren, M. (1997). Having second thoughts: student perceptions before and after a peer assessment exercise. Studies in Higher Education 22, 2, 233–239. Conway, R., Kember, D., Sivan, A. & Wu, M. (1993). Peer assessment of an individual’s contribution to a group project. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 18, 1, 45–55. Falchikov, N. (1986). Product comparisons and process benefits of collaborative group and selfassessment. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 11, 146–166. Firdyiwek, Y. (1999). Web-based courseware tools: where is the pedagogy? Educational Technology, 39, 1, 29–34. Freeman, M. & McKenzie, J. (2002). SPARK, a confidential web-based template for self and peer assessment of student teamwork: benefits of evaluating across different subjects. The British Journal of Educational Technology, 33, 5, 553–572. Gatfield, T. (1999). Examining student satisfaction with group projects and peer assessment. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 24, 4, 365–377. Goldfinch, J. & Raeside, R. (1990). Development of a peer assessment technique for obtaining individual marks on a group project. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 15, 3, 210–231. Loddington, S. (2008a). Peer assessment of group work: a review of the literature. Retrieved August 13, 2008, from http://www.webpaproject.com/?q=node/288 Pond, K., Coates, D. & Palermo, O. A. (2007). Student perceptions of peer review marking of team projects. Retrieved August 12, 2008, from http://dspace.lboro.ac.uk/dspace/bitstream/2134/ 3040/1/IJMEPaper%20190%20%23%20final2.pdf Quality Assurance Agency (2000). Code of practice for the assurance of academic quality and standards in higher education. Section 6: Assessment of students. Retrieved August 12, 2008, from http://www.qaa.ac.uk/academicinfrastructure/codeOfPractice/section6/archive/ default.asp Quality Assurance Agency (2006). Code of practice for the assurance of academic quality and standards in higher education. Section 6: Assessment of students. Retrieved August 12, 2008, from http://www.qaa.ac.uk/academicinfrastructure/codeOfPractice/section6/default.asp#p4 Race, P. (2001). A briefing on self, peer and group assessment (No. 9) LTSN Generic Centre. Retrieved April 30, 2007, from http://www.phil-race.com/files/self%20peer%20and%20group%20 assessment.pdf Robinson, C. L. (2006). Self and peer assessment in group work. Kongsberg: the SEFIMWG Seminar. University, L. (2007). Academic procedures quality handbook. Section 3. (7). Retrieved August 22, 2008, from http://www.lboro.ac.uk/admin/ar/policy/aqp/3/index.htm Wheater, P., Langan, M. & Dunleavy, P. J. (2005). Students assessing student: case studies on peer assessment. Planet 15, 13–15. Retrieved February 8, 2008, from http://www.gees.ac.uk/ planet/p15/p15.pdf Willmot, P. & Crawford, A. (2004). Online peer assessed marking of team projects. Paper presented at the International Conference on Engineering Education, Gainsville, FL. Willmot, P. & Crawford, A. (2005). Validating the assessment of individuals within undergraduate teams. Paper presented at the International Conference on Engineering Education, Gliwice, Poland. Willmot, P. & Crawford, A. (2007). Peer review of team marks using a web-based tool: an evaluation. Engineering Education 2, 1, 59–66. Willmot, P., Pond, K., Loddington, S. & Palermo, O. A. (2008). Perceptions of peer assessment in university teamwork. Paper presented at the International Conference Engineering Education, Pécs—Budapest, Hungary.|
Actions (login required)