| References: |
1. Schuster ME, McGlynn E, Brook RH: How good is the quality of healthcare
in the United States? Milbank Quarterly 1998, 76:517-563.
2. Grol R: Success and failures in the implementation of evidence-based
guidelines for clinical practice. Medical Care 2001, 39(8 Suppl
2):1146-1154.
3. McGlynn EA, Asch SM, Adams J, Keesey J, Hicks J, DeCristofaro A, Kerr EA:
The quality of care delivered to adults in the United States. New England
Journal of Medicine 2003, 348(26):2635-2645.
4. Clinical Effectiveness Research Agenda Group (CERAG): An Implementation
Research agenda Report 2008 [http://preview.implementationscience.com/
content/supplementary/1748-5908-4-18-s1.pdf], (last accessed 13 February
2011).
5. Eccles M, Armstrong D, Baker R, Clearly K, Davies H, Dvaies S, Glasziou P,
Illott I, Kinmonth AL, Leng G, Logan S, Marteau T, Michie S, Rogers H,
Rycroft-Malone J, Sibbald B: An implementation research agenda.
Implementation Science 2009, 4:18.
6. Denis JL, Beaulieu MD, Hebert Y, Langley A, Lozeau D, Pineault R,
Trottier LH: Clinical and Organizational Innovation in Healthcare
Organizations Ontario: Canadian Health Services Research Foundation/
Fondation Canadienne de la recherché sur les services de santé; 2001.
7. Antil T, Desrochers M, Joubert P, Bouchard C: Implementation of an
innovative grant programme to build partnerships between researchers,
decision-makers and practitioners: the experience of the Quebec Social
Research Council. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy 2003, 8(Suppl
2):35-43.
8. Denis JL, Lomas J: Editorial: Convergent evolution: the academic and
policy roots of collaborative research. Journal of Health Services Research &
Policy 2003, 8(Suppl 2):S2:1-S2:6.
9. Goering P, Butterill D, Jacobson N, Sturtevant D: Linkage and exchange at
the organizational level: a model of collaboration between research and
policy. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy 2003, 8(Suppl 2):
S2:14-S2:19.
10. Bowen S, Martens P, The Need to Know Team: Demystifying knowledge
translation: learning from the community. Journal of Health Services
Research & Policy 2005, 10(4):203-211.
11. Gagliardi AR, Fraser N, Wright FC, Lemieux-Charles L, Davis D: Fostering
knowledge exchange between researchers and decision-makers:
Exploring the effectiveness of a mixed-methods approach. Health Policy
2008, 86:53-63.
12. Baker R, Robertson N, Rogers S, Davies M, Brunskill N, Khunti K, Steiner M,
Williams M, Sinfield P: The Natinoal Institute of Health Research (NIHR)
Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care
(CLAHRC) for Leicestershire, Northamptonshire and Rutland (LNR): a
programme protocol. Implementation Science 2009, 4:72.
13. NIHR: Collaborations for leadership in applied health research and care.
Call for proposals to establish pilots 2007 [http://www.sdo.nihr.ac.uk/files/
researchcall/1072-brief.pdf].
14. Dopson S, Fitzgerald L, Ferlie E, Gabbay J, Locock L: No magic targets!
Changing clinical practice to become more evidence based. Health Care
Management Review 2002, 27(3):35-47.
15. Rycroft-Malone J, Kitson A, Harvey G, McCormack B, Seers K, Titchen A,
Eastbrooks C: Ingredients for Change: Revisiting a conceptual model.
Qual Saf Health Care 2002, 11:174-180.
16. Lomas J, Culyer T, McCutcheon C, McAuley L, Law S: Conceptualizing and
combining evidence for health system guidance. Canadian Health Services
Research Foundation (CHSRF) 2005 [http://www.chsrf.ca].
17. Graham ID, Logan J, Harrison MB, Straus SE, Tetroe J, Caswell W,
Robinson N: Lost in knowledge translation: Time for a map? The Journal
of Continuing Education in the Health Professionals 2006, 26:13-24.
18. Hirschkorn KA: Exclusive versus everyday forms of professional
knowledge: legitimacy claims in conventional and alternative medicine.
Sociol Health Illn 2006, 28(5):533-57.
19. Davies HTO, Nutley S, Walter I: Why ‘knowledge transfer’ is misconceived
for applied social research. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy
2008, 13(3):188-190.
20. Treasury HM: A review of UK health research funding: Sir David Cooksey.
London. HM Treasury; 2006 [http://62.164.176.164/d/
pbr06_cooksey_final_report_636.pdf].
21. Davies HTO, Nutley S, Smith PC: What Works? Evidence-based policy and
practice in public services Bristol: The Policy Press; 2000.
22. Greenhalgh T, Robert G, McFarlane F, Bate P, Kyriakidou O: Diffusion of
Innovations in Service Organisations: Systematic Review and
Recommendations. The Millbank Quarterly 2004, 82(4):581-629.
23. Dopson S, Fitzgerald L, (Eds): Knowledge to Action? Evidence-based health
care in context Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2005.
24. Harrison MB, Graham ID, Lorimer K, Griedberg E, Pierscianowski T,
Brandys T: Leg-ulcer care in the community, before and after
implementation of an evidence-based service. CMAJ 2005,
172(11):1447-1452.
25. Davies H, Powell A, Rushmer R: Healthcare professionals’ views on
clinician engagement in quality improvement. A literature review London,
The Health Foundation; 2007.
26. Nutley SM, Walter I, Davies HTO: Using Evidence: How research can inform
public services Bristol: The Policy Press; 2007.
27. Estabrooks CA, Scott S, Squires JE, Stevens B, O’Brien-Pallas L, Watt-
Watson J, Profetto-McGarth J, McGilton K, Golden-Biddle K, Lander J,
Donner G, Boschma G, Humphrey CK, Williams J: Patterns of research
utilization on patient care units. Implementation Science 2008, 3:31.
28. Van de Ven A: Central Problems in the Management of Innovation.
Management Science 1986, 32(5):590-607.
29. Nutley S, Davies HTO: Making a Reality of Evidence-Based Practice: Some
Lessons from the Diffusion of Innovations. Public Money and Management
2000, 35-42.
30. Iles V, Sutherland K: Organisational change: A review for health care
managers, professionals and researchers London: National Co-ordinating
Centre for NHS Service Delivery and Organisation; 2001.
31. Sheldon TA, Cullum N, Dawson D, Lankshear A, Lowson K, Watt I, West P,
Wright D, Wright J: What’s the evidence that NICE guidance has been
implemented? Results from a national evaluation using time series
analysis, audit of patients’ notes, and interviews. British Medical Journal
2004, 329(7473):999.
32. Eccles M, Grimshaw J, Walker A, Johnston M, Pitts N: Changing the
behaviour of healthcare professionals: the use of theory in promoting
the uptake of research findings. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2005,
58:107-112.
33. Mitton C, Adair CE, McKenzie E, Patten SB, Waye Perry B: Knowledge
Transfer and Exchange: Review and Synthesis of the Literature. The
Millbank Quarterly 2007, 85(4):729-768.
34. McNulty T, Ferlie E: Reengineering health care: The complexities of
organisational transformation Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2002.
35. McCormack B, Kitson A, Harvey G, Rycroft-Malone J, Seers K, Titchen A:
Getting Evidence into Practice: The meaning of ‘context’. Journal of
Advanced Nursing 2002, 38(1):94-104.
36. Scott T, Mannion R, Davies H, Marshall M: Healthcare Performance &
Organisational Culture Radcliffe Medical Press: Oxford; 2003.
37. Kitson A, Rycroft-Malone J, Harvey G, McCormack B, Seers K, Titchen A:
Evaluating the successful implementation of evidence into practice
using the PARIHS framework: theoretical and practical challenges.
Implementation Science 2008, 3:1.
38. Scott SD, Estabrooks CA, Allen M, Pollock C: A Context of Uncertainty:
How context shapes nurses’ research utilization behaviours. Qualitative
Health Research 2008, 18(3):347-357.
39. Ferlie E, Fitzgerald L, Wood M, Hawkins C: The nonspread of innovations:
The mediating role of professionals. Academy of Management Journal
2005, 48(1):117-134.
40. Lavis JN, Robertson D, Woodside JM, McLeod CB, Abelson J, The
Knowledge Transfer Study Group: How Can Research Organizations More
Effectively Transfer Research Knowledge to Decision Makers? The
Millbank Quarterly 2003, 81(2):221-248.
41. Wenger E: communities of practice: Learning, Meaning & Identity Cambridge
University Press: New York; 1998.
42. Locock L, Dopson S, Chambers D, Gabbay J: Understanding the role of
opinion leaders in improving clinical effectiveness. Social Science and
Medicine 2001, 53:745-757.
43. Swan J, Scarbrough H, Robertson M: The Construction of ‘communities of
practice’ in the Management of Innovation. Management Learning 2002,
33(4):477-496.
44. Gabbay J, le May A, Jefferson H, Webb D, Lovelock R, Powell J, Lathlean J: A
case study of knowledge management in multi-agency consumerinformed
‘communities of practice’: implications for evidence-based
policy development in health and social services. Health: An
Interdisciplinary Journal for the Social Study of Health, Illness and Medicine
2003, 7(3):283-310.
45. le May A: communities of practice in Health and Social Care West Sussex:
Blackwell Publishing Ltd; 2009.
46. Braithwaite J, Westbrook JI, Ranmuthugala G, Cunningham F, Plumb J,
Wiley J, Ball D, Huckson S, Hughes C, Johnston B, Callen J, Creswick N,
Georgiou A, Betbeder-Maibet L, Debono D: The development, design,
testing, refinement, simulation and application of an evaluation
framework for communities of practice and social-professional networks.
BMC Health Services Research 2009, 9:162.
47. Li L, Grimshaw J, Nielson C, Judd M, Coyle PC, Graham ID: Use of
communities of practice in business and health care sectors: A
systematic review. Implementation Science 2009, 4:27.
48. Li L, Grimshaw J, Nielson C, Judd M, Coyle PC, Graham ID: Evolution of
Wenger’s concept of community of practice. Implementation Science 2009,
4:11.
49. Gabbay J, le May A: Evidence-based guidelines or collectively constructed
‘mindlines?’ Ethnographic study of knowledge management in primary
care? British Medical Journal 2004, 329:1013.
50. Star SL, Griesemer JR: Institutional Ecology. ‘Translations’ and Boundary
Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate
Zoology, 1907-39. Social Studies of Science 1989, 19(1989):387-420.
51. Guston DH: Stabilizing the Boundary between US Politics and Science:
The Rôle of the Office of Technology Transfer as a Boundary
Organization. Social Studies of Science 1999, 29(1):87-111.
52. Carlile PR: A Pragmatic View of Knowledge and Boundaries: Boundary
objects in new product development. Organization Science 2002,
13(4):442-455.
53. Swan J, Bresnen M, Newell S, Robertson M: The object of knowledge: The
role of objects in biomedical intervention. Human Relations 2007,
60(12):1809-1837.
54. McGivern G, Dopson S: Inter-epistemic power and transferring
knowledge objects in a biomechanical network. Organization Studies
2010, 31(12):1667-1286.
55. ICEBeRG Group: Designing theoretically-informed implementation
interventions. Implementation Science 2006, 1:4 [http://www.
implementationscience.com/content/1/1/4].
56. Rycroft-Malone J: Theory and Knowledge Translation: Setting some coordinates.
Nursing Research 2007, 56(4S):S78-S85.
57. Rycroft-Malone J, Harvey G, Seers K, Kitson A, McCormack B, Titchen A: An
exploration of the factors that influence the implementation of evidence
into practice. Journal of Clinical Nursing 2004, 13:913-924.
58. Rycroft-Malone J, Seers K, Titchen A, Kitson A, Harvey G, McCormack B:
What counts as evidence in evidence based practice? Journal of
Advanced Nursing 2004, 47(1):81-90.
59. Pawson R, Tilley N: Realistic Evaluation London: Sage Publications; 1997.
60. Pawson R, Greenhalgh T, Harvey G, Walshe K: Realist Synthesis: an
introduction. ESRC Research Methods Programme: University of
Manchester RMP: Methods Paper 2/2004; [http://www.ccsr.ac.uk/methods/
publications/documents/RMPmethods2.pdf].
61. Sridharan S, Campbell B, Zinzow H: Developing a Stakeholder-Driver
Anticipated Timeline of Impact for Evaluation of Social Programs.
American Journal of Evaluation 2006, 27(2):148-162.
62. Sullivan H, Barnes M, Matka E: Building collaborative capacity through
‘theories of change’. Early lessons from the evaluation of health action
zones in England. Evaluation 2002, 8(2):205-226.
63. Greenhalgh T, Humphrey C, Hughes J, Macfarlane F, Butler C, Pawson R:
How do you modernize a Health Service? A realist evaluation of wholescale
transformation in London. Millbank Quarterly 2009, 87(2):391-417.
64. Rycroft-Malone J, Fontenla M, Bick D, Seers K: Protocol-Based Care Evaluation
Project Final Report; 2008a. NIHR Service Delivery & Organisation
Programme SDO/78/2004; [http://www.sdo.nihr.ac.uk/files/project/78-finalreport.
pdf].
65. Rycroft-Malone J, Fontenla M, Bick D, Seers K: Protocol-based care: Impact
on roles and service delivery. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 2008,
14:867-873.
66. Rycroft-Malone J, Fontenla M, Bick D, Seers K: A Realistic Evaluation: the
case of protocol-based care. Implementation Science 2010, 5(38).
67. Byng R, Norman I, Redfern S: Using realistic evaluation to evaluate a
practice-level intervention to improve primary healthcare for patients
with long-term mental illness. Evaluation 2005, 11(1):69-93.
68. Marchal B, Dedzo M, Kegels G: A realist evaluation of the management of
well-performing regional hospital in Ghana. Health Service Research 2010,
10:24.
69. Pittam G, Boyce M, Sesker J, Lockett H, Samele C: Employment advice in
primary care: a realistic evaluation. Health and Social Care in the
Community 2010, 18(6):598-606.
70. Weiss CH: The many meanings of research utilization. Public
Administration Review 1979, 39(5):426-431.
71. Wilkinson JE: Research impact - hard hitting or subtle change? Worldviews
on Evidence-based Nursing 2010, 7(1):1-3.
72. Wilkinson JE, Johnson N, Wimpenny P: Models and approaches to inform
the impacts of implementation of evidence-based practice. In Evaluating
the Impact of Implementation of Evidence-Based Practice. Edited by: Bick D,
Graham I. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell; 2010:.
73. Gibbons M, Limoges C, Nowotny H, Schwartzman S: The new production of
knowledge - The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies
London. Sage; 1994.
74. Denis JL, Lehoux P, Hivon M, Champagne F: Creating a new articulation
between research and practice through policy? The views and
experiences of researchers and practitioners. Journal of Health Services
Research & Policy 2003, 8(Suppl 2):S2:44-S2:50.
75. Martens PJ, Roos NP: When Health Services Researchers and Policy Makers
Interact: Tales from the Tectonic Plates. Healthcare Policy 2005, 1(1):72-84.
76. Kothari A, Birch S, Charles C: ’Interaction’ and research utilisation in health
policies and programs: does it work? Health Policy 2005, 71:117-125.
77. Cargo M, Mercer SL: The Value and Challenges of Participatory Research:
Strengthening Its Practice. Annu Rev Public Health 2007, 29(24):1-24.
78. Guba EG, Lincoln YS: 4th Generation Evaluation Newbury Park: Sage; 1989.
79. Kemmis S: Participatory Action Research and the Public Sphere.
EDUCATIONAL ACTION RESEARCH 2006, 14(4):459-476.
80. Seale C: The quality of qualitative research Sage: London; 1999.
81. Yin RK: Case study research - design and methods. 3 edition. Thousand Oaks:
Sage; 2003.
82. Patton M: Utilization-Focused Evaluation. 4 edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
Publications; 2008.
83. Andrews GJ, Evans J: Understanding the reproduction of health care:
towards geographies in healthcare work. Progress in Human Geography
2008, 32(6):759-780.
84. Spradley JP: Participant Observation Orlando: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich
College Publishers; 1980.
85. Nowotny H: Democratising expertise and socially robust knowledge.
Science and Public Policy 2003, 30(3):151-156.
86. Bartunek J, Trullen J, Bonet E, Sauquet A: Sharing and expanding
academic and practitioner knowledge in health care. Journal of Health
Services Research & Policy 2003, 8(Suppl 2):S2:62-S2:68.
87. Huberman AM, Miles MB: Data management and analysis methods. In
Collecting and interpreting qualitative materials. Edited by: Denzin NK,
Lincoln YS. Sage: Thousand Oaks, CA; 1998:179-210.
88. Kass N, Pronovost PJ, Sugarman J, Goeschel C, Lubomski L, Faden R:
Controversy and quality improvement: lingering questions about ethics,
oversight and patient safety research. The Joint Commission Journal on
Quality and Patient Safety 2008, 34(6):349-353.
89 |
Tools
Tools
![[img]](http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/style/images/fileicons/application_pdf.png)
