Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Statistics
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login

Words versus actions as a means to influence cooperation in social dilemma situations

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Pogrebna, Ganna, Schade, Christian, Krantz, David H., 1938- and Keser, Claudia, 1961-. (2011) Words versus actions as a means to influence cooperation in social dilemma situations. Theory and Decision, Vol.71 (No.4). pp. 473-502. ISSN 0040-5833

[img]
Preview
PDF
WRAP_Pogrebna_Words_versus_actions.pdf - Accepted Version - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader

Download (596Kb)
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11238-011-9248-5

Abstract

We use a sequential voluntary contribution game to compare the relative impact of firstmover’s non-binding announcement versus binding commitment on cooperation. We find that non-binding announcement and binding commitment increase individual contributions to a similar extent. Since announced contributions systematically exceed commitments, in sessions with non-binding announcement, second-movers tend to contribute more to the group activity than in sessions with binding commitment. Yet, second-movers appear to be more motivated towards achieving a social optimum when the first-mover uses commitment. We also find that non-binding announcement has a higher impact on individual propensity to cooperate than the ex post contribution of the first-mover. However, the failure to make announced contributions decreases cooperation even though the first-mover is reassigned in every period.

Item Type: Journal Article
Subjects: B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology
Divisions: Faculty of Social Sciences > Economics
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): Cooperativeness
Journal or Publication Title: Theory and Decision
Publisher: Springer
ISSN: 0040-5833
Date: 13 April 2011
Volume: Vol.71
Number: No.4
Number of Pages: 30
Page Range: pp. 473-502
Identification Number: 10.1007/s11238-011-9248-5
Status: Peer Reviewed
Access rights to Published version: Restricted or Subscription Access
Funder: Volkswagenstiftung (VWS)
References: Arbak, E. and M. Villeval (2007) “Endogenous Leadership Selection and Influence,” Université Lyon 2 Working Paper. Andreoni, J. (1988) “Why Free Ride?: Strategies and Learning in Public Goods Experiments,” Journal of Public Economics, 37(3), pp. 291‐304. Andreoni, J. and R. Croson (2008) “Partners versus Strangers: Random Rematching in Public Goods Experiments,” Handbook of Experimental Economics Results (Charles R. Plott & Vernon L. Smith eds.), Elsevier, Chapter 82, pp. 776‐783. Baliga, S. and S. Morris (2002) “Co‐ordination, Spillovers, and Pre‐game communication,” Journal of Economic Theory, 105(2), pp. 450‐468. Balliet, D. (2010) “Communication and Cooperation in Social Dilemmas: A Meta‐Analytic Review,” Journal of Conflict Resolution, 54, pp. 39‐57. Blume, A. and A. Ortmann (2007) “The Effects of Costless Pre‐play Communication: Experimental Evidence from Games with Pareto‐ranked Equilibria,” Journal of Economic Theory, 132(1), pp. 274‐290. Bochet O., Page T. and L. Putterman (2006) “Communication and Punishment in Voluntary Contribution Experiments”, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 60, pp. 11‐26. Callero, P. (1994) “From Role Playing to Role‐Using: Understanding Role as Resource,” Social Psychology Quarterly, 57 (3), pp. 228‐243. Charness, G. and B. Grosskopf (2004) “What Makes Pre‐game Communication Effective? Experimental Evidence,” Economics Letters, 83(3), pp. 383‐389. Charness, G., Rigotti, L. and A. Rustichini (2007) “Individual Behavior and Group Membership.” American Economic Review, 97(4), pp. 1340‐1352. Chen, Y. and S. X. Li (2008) “Group Identity and Social Preferences,” American Economic Review, 99(1), pp. 431‐457. Chernoff H and E. L. Lehmann (1954) “The Use of Maximum Likelihood Estimates in χ2 Tests for Goodness‐of‐fit,” Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 25, pp. 579‐586. Crawford, V. (1998) “A Survey of Experiments on Communication via Pre‐game communication,” Journal of Economic Theory, 78(2), pp. 286‐298. Crawford, V. and J. Sobel (1982) “Strategic Information Transmission,” Econometrica, 50(6), pp. 1431‐ 1451. Gächter, S. and E. Renner (2003) “Leading by Example in the Presence of Free Rider Incentives,” University of St. Gallen Working Paper. Gächter, S., Nosenzo, D., Renner, E. and Martin Sefton (2010) “Who Makes A Good Leader? Cooperativeness, Optimism and Leading‐By‐Example,” Economic Inquiry, forthcoming. Genesove, D. and W. P. Mullin (2001)"Rules, Communication and Collusion: Narrative Evidence from the Sugar Institute Case," American Economic Review, 91(3), pp. 379‐398. Green J.R. and N.L. Stokey (1980) "A Two‐Person Game of Information Transmission," Discussion Papers 418, Northwestern University, Center for Mathematical Studies in Economics and Management Science. Güth, W., Levati, V., Sutter, M. and E. Van der Heijden (2007) “Leading by Example With and Without Exclusion Power in Voluntary Contribution Experiments,” Journal of Public Economics, 91(5‐6), pp. 1023‐1042. Isaac, R.M., Walker J. and S.H. Thomas (1984) “Divergent Evidence on Free Riding: An Experimental Examination of Possible Explanations,” Public Choice, 43(2), pp. 113‐149. Farrell, J.(1987) “Pre‐game communication, Coordination, and Entry,” RAND Journal of Economics, 18(1), pp. 34‐39. Farrell, J. (1988) “Communication, Coordination and Nash Equilibrium,” Economic Letters, 27(3), pp. 209‐ 215. Farrell, J. (1995) “Talk is Cheap,” American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings, 85(2), pp. 186‐190. Farrell, J. and M. Rabin (1996) “Pre‐game Communication,” Journal of Economic Perspectives, 10(3), pp. 103‐118. Fischbacher, U. (2007) “z‐Tree: Zurich Toolbox for Ready‐made Economic experiments.” Experimental Economics, 10(2), pp. 171‐178. Hermalin, B. E. (1998) “Toward an Economic Theory of Leadership: Leading by Example,” American Economic Review, 88(5), pp. 1188–1206. Holt, Ch. and S. Laury (2002) “Risk Aversion and Incentive Effects,” American Economic Review, 92(5), pp. 1644‐1655. Krantz, D.H. and H. C. Kunreuther (2007) “Goals and Plans in Decision Making,” Judgment and Decision Making, 2(3), pp. 137‐168. Kruskal W. H. and W. A. Wallis (1952) “Use of Ranks in One‐criterion Variance Analysis, Journal of the American Statistical Association,” 47(260), pp. 583–621. Muller, L., Sefton, M. Martin, R. Steinberg and L. Vesterlund (2008) “Strategic Behavior and Learning in Repeated Voluntary Contribution Experiments,” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 67(3‐4), pp. 782‐793. Levati, V., Sutter, M. and E. van der Heijden (2007) “Leading by Example in a Public Goods Game with Heterogeneity and Incomplete Information,” Journal of Conflict Resolution, 51 (5), pp. 793‐818. Longford, N.T. (1994) “Logistic Regression with Random Coefficients,” Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, 17(1), pp. 1‐15. Mann, H. B. and D.R. Whitney (1947) “On a Test of Whether One of Two Random Variables Is Stochastically Larger Than the Other,” Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 18, pp. 50‐60. Moxnes, E. and E. Van der Heijden (2003) “The Effect of Leadership in a Public Bad Experiment,” Journal of Conflict Resolution, 47(6), pp. 773–795. Offerman, Th., A. Schram, and J. Sonnemans (1998) “Quantal Response Models in Step‐level Public Good Games,” European Journal of Political Economy, 14(1), pp. 89‐100. Ottaviani, M. and P. N. Sørensen (2006) “Reputational Pre‐game Communication,” RAND Journal of Economics, 37(1), pp. 155‐175. Palfrey, T. R. and J. E. Prisbrey (1997) “Anomalous Behavior in Public Goods Experiments: How Much and Why?” American Economic Review, 87, 829‐846. Pollay, R. (1968) “The Measurement of Role Differentiation,” Sociometry, 31(1), pp. 120‐124. Potters, J., Sefton, M. and L. Vesterlund (2007)"Leading‐by‐example and Signaling in Voluntary Contribution Games: an Experimental Study," Economic Theory, 33(1), pp. 169‐182. Rabe‐Hesketh, S., Skrondal, A. and A. Pickles (2002) “Reliable Estimation of Generalised Linear Mixed Models Using Adaptive Quadrature,” Stata Journal, 2(1), pp. 1‐21. Rabin, M.(1994) “A Model of Pre‐game Communication,” Journal of Economic Theory, 63(2), pp. 370‐ 391. Rotemberg, J. and G. Saloner (1993) “Leadership Style and Incentives,” Management Science, 39(11), pp. 1299‐1318. Sally, D. (1995) “Conversation and Cooperation in Social Dilemmas: A Meta‐Analysis of Experiments from 1958 to 1992,” Rationality and Society, 7, pp. 58‐92. Souder, W. (1977) “Effectiveness of Nominal and Interacting Group Decision Processes for Integrating R & D and Marketing,” Management Science, 23(6), pp. 595‐605. Tannenbaum, R. and F. Massarik (1957) “Leadership: A Frame of Reference,” Management Science, 4(1), pp. 1‐19. Wilcoxon, F. (1945) “Individual Comparisons by Ranking Methods,” Biometrics Bulletin, 1(6), pp. 80‐83.
URI: http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/37685

Request changes to a record

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Document Downloads

More statistics for this item...
twitter

Email us: publications@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us