The Library

Sex and discipline differences in empathising, systemising and autistic symptomatology : evidence from a student population

Tools

Carroll, Julia M. and Yung Chiew, Kim. (2006) Sex and discipline differences in empathising, systemising and autistic symptomatology : evidence from a student population. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, Vol.36 (No.7). pp. 949-957. ISSN 0162-3257

Preview

PDF
WRAP_Carroll_JCarroll04039_R.pdf - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
Download (309Kb)

Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10803-006-0127-9

Abstract

Baron-Cohenʹs (2002) theory of autism suggests that deficits in theory of mind and weak central coherence in autism can be explained as features of an ‘extreme male brain’ in which empathising is weak and systemising is strong. The two studies presented investigate this theory by examining the relationships between theory of mind, central coherence, empathising, systemising and autistic-like symptomatology in a sample of undergraduates. Study 1 used 48 undergraduates in four equal groups of male and female science and humanities students. Consistent with the theory, there were sex differences in the expected directions on all tasks in the first study. Differences according to discipline were found only on the Block Design task. Individuals with the ‘male brain’ profile also tended to show higher levels of autistic symptomatology. There was no evidence of a link between empathising and social skills on one hand and systemising and central coherence on the other. In the second study, performance on the Mechanical Reasoning and the Social Skills Inventory tasks was compared with performance on the Baron‐Cohen Empathising and Systemising Quotients in a sub‐sample of 20 students from Study 1. Moderately significant correlations were found between the Systemising Quotient and the Mechanical Reasoning task and between the Empathising Quotient and the Social Skills Inventory. Findings are largely consistent with the distinction between empathising and systemising but raise some questions concerning the tasks used to measure these abilities.

Item Type:	Journal Article
Subjects:	B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology
Divisions:	Faculty of Science > Psychology
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH):	Autism, Gender, Sex differences, Brain -- Research
Journal or Publication Title:	Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
Publisher:	Springer
ISSN:	0162-3257
Date:	9 August 2006
Volume:	Vol.36
Number:	No.7
Page Range:	pp. 949-957
Identification Number:	10.1007/s10803-006-0127-9
Status:	Peer Reviewed
Access rights to Published version:	Open Access
References:	Baron‐Cohen, S. (2002). The extreme male brain theory of autism. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6, 248‐255. Baron‐Cohen, S. (2003). The essential difference: Men, women and the extreme male brain. London: Penguin Books Ltd. Baron‐Cohen, S., Bolton, P., Wheelwright, S., Scahill, V., Short, L., Mead, G., et al. (1998). Does autism occur more often in the families of physicists, engineers, and mathematicians? Autism, 2, 296‐301. Baron‐Cohen, S., & Hammer, J. (1997). Is autism an extreme form of the ʺmale brainʺ? Advances in Infancy Research, 11, 196‐217. Baron‐Cohen, S., Leslie, A. M., & Frith, U. (1985). Does the autistic child have a theory of mind? Cognition, 21, 37‐46. Baron‐Cohen, S., Wheelwright, S., Hill, J., Raste, Y., & Plumb, I. (2001). The ʺreading the mind in the eyesʺ test revised version: A study with normal adults and adults with asperger syndrome or high‐functioning autism. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 42(2), 241‐251. Baron‐Cohen, S., Wheelwright, S., Skinner, R., Martin, J. G., & Clubley, E. (2001). The Autism‐Spectrum Quotient: Evidence from Asperger syndrome/ high functioning autism, males, females, scientists and mathematicians. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 31, 5‐17. Baron‐Cohen, S., Wheelwright, S., Stott, C., Bolton, P., & Goodyer, I. (1997). Is there a link between engineering and autism? Autism, 1(1), 101‐109. Bennett, G. K., Seashore, H. G., & Wesman, A. G. (1974). Differential Aptitude Tests (5th ed.). New York: Psychological Corporation. Briskman, J., Happe, F., & Frith, U. (2001). Exploring the cognitive phenotype of autism: Weak ʺcentral coherenceʺ in parents and siblings of children with autism II: Real‐life skills and preferences. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 42(3), 309‐316. Frith, U. (2003). Autism: Explaining the enigma. Oxford, UK: Blackwell. Frith, U., & Happe, F. (1994). Autism: ʺbeyond theory of mindʺ. Cognition, 50, 115‐132. Hoffman, M. L. (1977). Sex differences in empathy and related behaviours. Psychological Bulletin, 84(4), 712‐722. Jarrold, C., Butler, D. W., Cottingham, E. M., & Jimenez, F. (2000). Linking theory of mind and central coherence in autism and in the general population. Developmental Psychology, 36(1), 126‐138. Lawson, J., Baron‐Cohen, S., & Wheelwright, S. (2004). Empathising and systemising in adults with and without Asperber syndrome. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 34, 301‐310. Morgan, B., Maybery, M., & Durkin, K. (2003). Weak central coherence, poor joint attention and low verbal ability: Independent deficits in early autism. Developmental Psychology, 39(4), 646‐656. Riggio, R. E. (1989). Social Skills Inventory. In. USA: Consulting Psychologists Press. Voyer, D., Voyer, S., & Bryden, M. P. (1995). Magnitude of sex differences in spatial abilities: A meta‐analysis and consideration of critical variables. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 250‐270. Wechsler, D. (1999). Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence. San Antonio, USA: Psychological Corporation. Witkin, H. A., Oltman, P. K., Raskin, E., & Karp, S. A. (1971). A manual for the embedded figures test. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
URI:	http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/380