Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Statistics
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login

Joint action and development

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Butterfill, Stephen A. (Stephen Andrew). (2011) Joint action and development. The Philosophical Quarterly, Vol.62 (No.246). pp. 23-47. ISSN 1467-9213

[img]
Preview
PDF
WRAP_Butterfill_230911-joint_action_0.94.pdf - Draft Version - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader

Download (163Kb)
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9213.2011.00005.x

Abstract

Given the premise that joint action plays some role in explaining how humans come to understand minds, what could joint action be? Not what a leading account, Michael Bratman’s, says it is. For on that account engaging in joint action involves sharing intentions and sharing intentions requires much of the understanding of minds whose development is supposed to be explained by appeal to joint action. This paper therefore offers an account of a different kind of joint action, an account compatible with the premise about development. The new account is no replacement for the leading account; rather the accounts characterise two kinds of joint action. Where the kind of joint characterised by the leading account involves shared intentions, the new account characterises a kind of joint action involving shared goals.

Item Type: Journal Article
Subjects: B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology
Divisions: Faculty of Social Sciences > Philosophy
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): Action theory, Human behavior
Journal or Publication Title: The Philosophical Quarterly
Publisher: Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
ISSN: 1467-9213
Date: October 2011
Volume: Vol.62
Number: No.246
Page Range: pp. 23-47
Identification Number: 10.1111/j.1467-9213.2011.00005.x
Status: Peer Reviewed
Publication Status: Published
Access rights to Published version: Restricted or Subscription Access
References: Apperly, I. A. & Butterfill, S. (2009). Do humans have two systems to track beliefs and belief-like states? Psychological Review, 2009(116), 4. Astington, J. (1991). Intention in the child’s theory of mind. In D. Frye & C. Moore (Eds.), Children’s Theories of Mind: mental states and social understanding (pp. 157–172). Hove: Erlbaum. Astington, J. & Gopnik, A. (1991). Developing understanding of desire and intention. In A. Whiten (Ed.), Natural Theories of the Mind: evolution, development and simulation of everyday mindreading (pp. 39–50). Oxford: Blackwell. Baillargeon, R., Scott, R. M., & He, Z. (2010). False-belief understanding in infants. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14(3), 110–118. Bartsch, K. & Wellman, H. M. (1995). Children talk about the mind. New York ; Oxford: Oxford University Press. Behne, T., Carpenter, M., & Tomasello, M. (2005). One-year-olds comprehend the communicative intentions behind gestures in a hiding game. Developmental Science, 8(6), 492–499. Bizzu, E. (2001). Motor control. In R. A. Wilson & F. C. Keil (Eds.), The MIT Encyclopedia of the Cognitive Sciences. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press. Bratman, M. (1984). Two faces of intention. The Philosophical Review, 93(3), 375–405. Bratman, M. (1987). Intentions, Plans, and Practical Reasoning. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press. Bratman, M. (1992). Shared cooperative activity. The Philosophical Review, 101(2), 327–341. Bratman, M. (1993). Shared intention. Ethics, 104, 97–113. Bratman, M. (1999 [1997]). I intend that we j. In Faces of Intention. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Bratman, M. (2007). Structures of Agency. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Bratman, M. (2009). Modest sociality and the distinctiveness of intention. Philosophical Studies, 144(1), 149–165. Brownell, C. A., Ramani, G. B., & Zerwas, S. (2006). Becoming a social partner with peers: cooperation and social understanding in one- and two-year-olds. Child Development, 77(4), 803–21. Carpenter, M. (2009). Just how joint is joint action in infancy? Topics in Cognitive Science, 1(2), 380–392. Csibra, G. (2008). Goal attribution to inanimate agents by 6.5-month-old infants. Cognition, 107(2), 705–717. Csibra, G., Bíró, S., Koós, O., & Gergely, G. (2003). One-year-old infants use teleological representations of actions productively. Cognitive Science, 27(1), 111–133. Dejean, A., Solano, P. J., Ayroles, J., Corbara, B., & Orivel, J. (2005). Insect behaviour: Arboreal ants build traps to capture prey. Nature, 434, 973. Dickinson, A. & Balleine, B. (1993). Actions and responses: the dual psychology of behaviour. In N. Eilan, R. McCarthy, & B. Brewer (Eds.), Spatial representation: problems in philosophy and psychology (pp. 277–293). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Dickinson, A. & Balleine, B. (2000). Causal cognition and goal-directed action. In C. Heyes & L. Huber (Eds.), The Evolution of Cognition. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. Frankfurt, H. (1971). Freedom of the will and the concept of a person. The Journal of Philosophy, 68(1), 5–20. Gergely, G. & Csibra, G. (2003). Teleological reasoning in infancy: the na‹ve theory of rational action. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7(7), 287–292. Gergely, G., Nadasky, Z., Csibra, G., & Biro, S. (1995). Taking the intentional stance at 12 months of age. Cognition, 56, 165–193. Gilbert, M. (1990). Walking together: A paradigmatic social phenomenon. Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 15, 14. Gilbert, M. (1992). On Social Facts. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Gilbert, M. (2006). Rationality in collective action. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 36(1), 3–17. Goebl, W. & Palmer, C. (2009). Synchronization of timing and motion among performing musicians. Music Perception: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 26(5), 427–438. Gold, N. & Sugden, R. (2007a). Collective intentions and team agency. Journal of Philosophy, 104(3), 109–137. Gold, N. & Sugden, R. (2007b). Theories of team agency. In F. Peter & H. B. Schmid (Eds.), Rationality and Commitment (pp. 280–312). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Gräfenhain, M., Behne, T., Carpenter, M., & Tomasello, M. (2009). Young children’s understanding of joint commitments. Developmental Psychology, 45(5), 1430–1443. Haggard, P. (1998). Planning of action sequences. Acta Psychologica, 99(2), 201–215. Hawthorne, J. O. (2004). Knowledge and Lotteries. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Helm, B. W. (2008). Plural agents. Nous, 42(1), 17–49. Hughes, C., Fujisawa, K. K., Ensor, R., Lecce, S., & Marfleet, R. (2006). Cooperation and conversations about the mind: A study of individual differences in 2-year-olds and their siblings. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 24(1), 53–72. Hursthouse, R. (1991). Arational actions. The Journal of Philosophy, 88(2), 57–68. Knoblich, G., Butterfill, S., & Sebanz, N. (2010). Psychological research on joint action: Theory and data. In B. Ross (Ed.), Psychology of Learning and Motivation, volume 51 (pp. 59–101). Academic Press. Knoblich, G. & Sebanz, N. (2008). Evolving intentions for social interaction: from entrainment to joint action. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 363, 2021–2031. Kovács, Á. M., Téglás, E., & Endress, A. D. (2010). The social sense: Susceptibility to others’ beliefs in human infants and adults. Science, 330(6012), 1830–1834. Kutz, C. (2000). Acting together. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 61(1), 1–31. Ludwig, K. (2007). Collective intentional behavior from the standpoint of semantics. Nous, 41(3), 355–393. Luo, Y. & Baillargeon, R. (2005). Can a self-propelled box have a goal? Psychological Science, 16(8), 601–608. Miller, S. (2001). Social Action: A Teleological Account. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Moll, H. & Tomasello, M. (2007). Cooperation and human cognition: the vygotskian intelligence hypothesis. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 362(1480), 639–648. Onishi, K. H. & Baillargeon, R. (2005). Do 15-month-old infants understand false beliefs? Science, 308(8), 255–258. Premack, D. (1990). The infant’s theory of self-propelled objects. Cognition, 36(1), 1–16. Price, C. (2001). Functions in Mind. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Richardson, M. J., Campbell, W. L., & Schmidt, R. C. (2009). Movement interference during action observation as emergent coordination. Neuroscience Letters, 449(2), 117–122. Roth, A. S. (2004). Shared agency and contralateral commitments. The Philosophical Review, 113(3), 359–410. Schmidt, R. C., Fitzpatrick, P., Caron, R., & Mergeche, J. (2010). Understanding social motor coordination. Human Movement Science, In Press, Corrected Proof. Searle, J. R. (1983). Intentionality: An Essay in the Philosophy of Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Searle, J. R. (1990 [2002]). Collective intentions and actions. In Consciousness and Language (pp. 90–105). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Searle, J. R. (1994). The Construction of Social Reality. New York: The Free Press. Smith, T. H. (forthcoming 2011). Playing one’s part. Review of Philosophy and Psychology. Sugden, R. (2000). Team preferences. Economics and Philosophy, 16, 175–204. Surian, L., Caldi, S., & Sperber, D. (2007). Attribution of beliefs by 13-monthold infants. Psychological Science, 18(7), 580–586. Tollefsen, D. (2005). Let’s pretend: Children and joint action. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 35(75), 74–97. Tomasello, M. (2008). Origins of HUman Communication. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. Tomasello, M. & Carpenter, M. (2007). Shared intentionality. Developmental Science, 10(1), 121–5. Tomasello, M., Carpenter, M., Call, J., Behne, T., & Moll, H. (2005). Understanding and sharing intentions: The origins of cultural cognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 28, 675–735. Tomasello, M. & Rakoczy, H. (2003). What makes human cognition unique? from individual to shared to collective intentionality. Mind and Language, 18(2), 121–147. Tuomela, R. (1995). The Importance of Us: A Philosophical Study of Basic Social Notions. Stanford: Stanford University Press. Velleman, D. (1997). How to share an intention. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 57(1), 29–50. Velleman, D. (2000). The Possibility of Practical Reason. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Vesper, C., Butterfill, S., Knoblich, G., & Sebanz, N. (2010). A minimal architecture for joint action. Neural Networks, 23(8-9), 998–1003. Wellman, H., Cross, D., & Watson, J. (2001). Meta-analysis of theory of mind development: The truth about false-belief. Child Development, 72(3), 655–684. Wimmer, H. & Perner, J. (1983). Beliefs about beliefs: Representation and constraining function of wrong beliefs in young children’s understanding of deception. Cognition, 13, 103–128. Woodward, A. L. (1998). Infants selectively encode the goal object of an actor’s reach. Cognition, 69, 1–34. Woodward, A. L. & Sommerville, J. A. (2000). Twelve-month-old infants interpret action in context. Psychological Science, 11(1), 73–77. Wright, L. (1976). Teleological Explanations. Berkeley: University of California Press.
URI: http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/38298

Request changes to a record

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Document Downloads

More statistics for this item...
twitter

Email us: publications@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us