Reader, J., Green, M. J., Kaler, Jasmeet, Mason, Sam (Sam A.) and Green, Laura E.. (2011) Effect of mobility score on milk yield and activity in dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science, Vol.94 (No.10). pp. 5045-5052. ISSN 00220302

Preview

PDF WRAP_Green_0380313-lf-260911-reader_et_al_wrap_post_print.pdf - Accepted Version - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader Download (436Kb)

Abstract

Previous studies have indicated that lame cows have a reduced milk yield both before and after they are treated. One explanation for the reduction in yield before treatment is that there is a delay to treatment, that is, cows have impaired mobility for some time before they are treated. The aim of this study was to test this hypothesis by investigating temporal associations between change in milk yield and change in mobility score. Mobility score (MS, on a scale 0 to 3), milk yield, treatments for lameness and cow activity were recorded on 312 cows in a dairy herd in Somerset, UK for 1 yr. The MS was scored every 2 wk and compared with the daily yield and activity (steps/h) averaged over the previous 16 d. Approximately 44 % of MS changed within 14 d, usually by 1 score. Overall, milk yields of cows with MS 1 were higher than those of cows with other scores. Cows with MS 2 and 3 produced 0.7 (0.35 - 0.97) kg and 1.6 (0.98 – 2.23) kg less milk / d, respectively, compared with cows with MS 1. In addition, cows with MS 1 were slightly but significantly more active than cows with MS 0, 2 or 3. Cows with MS 2 and 3 were 0.0.02 (0.01 – 0.03) and 0.03 (0.01 – 0.05) mean log steps less active than cows with MS 1. There was a reduction in yield from 6 - 8 wk before becoming MS 2 0.5 (0.12 – 0.47) or 3 0.9 (0.16 – 1.65) to 4 wk after recovering from MS 2 0.42 (0.09 – 0.75) and non- significantly, score 3. The activity of cows was significantly less but quantitatively small (mean log steps 0.01) with increasing MS; the associations between activity and parity (mean 0.03 – 0.11) and month of lactation (mean 0.03 – 0.36) were quantitatively larger. Results from a multistate model indicated that once cows were lame they remained lame or become lame again despite treatment. We conclude that cows started to reduce milk production before their mobility is visibly impaired. One explanation for this is that MS is not 100% sensitive. An alternative hypothesis, using evidence from other studies, is that reduction in milk yield and development of lameness are on a common causal pathway most likely linked to loss in body condition and reduced digital cushion thickness as a result of the demands from producing high milk yields.

[error in script] [error in script]

Item Type:	Journal Article
Subjects:	S Agriculture > SF Animal culture
Divisions:	Faculty of Science > Life Sciences (2010- )
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH):	Milk yield, Lameness in cattle
Journal or Publication Title:	Journal of Dairy Science
Publisher:	Elsevier
ISSN:	00220302
Date:	October 2011
Volume:	Vol.94
Number:	No.10
Page Range:	pp. 5045-5052
Identification Number:	10.3168/jds.2011-4415
Status:	Peer Reviewed
Publication Status:	Published
Access rights to Published version:	Restricted or Subscription Access
Funder:	Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons Trust
References:	Amory, J. R., Barker, Z. E., Wright, J. L., Mason, S. A., Blowey, R. W., and Green, L. E. 2008. Associations between sole ulcer, white line disease and digital dermatitis and the milk of 1824 dairy cows on 30 dairy cow farms in England and Wales. Prev. Vet. Med. 83:381- 391. Archer, S. C., Green, M. J., and Huxley, J. N. 2010. Association between milk yield and serial locomotion score assessments in UK dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 93:4045-4053 Barker, Z. E. (2007) Epidemiology of Lameness in Dairy cows. PhD thesis. University of Warwick. Barker, Z. E., Amory, J. R., Wright, J. L., Mason, S. A., Blowey, R. W., and Green, L. E. 2007. Management factors associated with impaired locomotion in dairy cows in England and Wales. J. Dairy Sci. 90:3270–3277. Barker Z. E., Amory J. R., Wright J. L., Mason S. A., Blowey R. W., and Green L. E. 2009. Risk factors for increased rates of sole ulcers white line disease and digital dermatitis in dairy cattle from twenty-seven farms in England and Wales. J. Dairy Sci. 92:1971-1978. Bell N. J., Bell M. J., Knowles T. G., Whay H. R., Main D. C. J., and Webster A. J. F. 2009. The development implementation and testing of a lameness control programme based on HACCP principles and designed for heifers on dairy farms. Vet. J. 180:178-188. Bicalho, R. C., Warnick, L. D., and Guard, C. L. 2008. Strategies to analyze milk losses caused by diseases with potential incidence throughout the lactation: a lameness example. J. Dairy Sci. 91:2653-61 Bicalho, R. C., Machado, V. S., and Caixeta, L. S. 2009. Lameness in dairy cattle: A debilitating disease or a disease of debilitated cattle? A cross-sectional study of lameness prevalence and thickness of the digital cushion J. Dairy Sci. 92:3175–3184 Clarkson, M. J., Downham, D. Y., Faull, W. B., Hughes, J. W., Manson, F. J., Merritt, J.B., Murray, R. D., Russell, W. B., Sutherst, J. E., and Ward, W. R. 199 . Incidence and prevalence of lameness in dairy cattle. Vet. Rec. 138:563-567. Goldstein, H., 1995. Multilevel Statistical Models Ed. , London, Edward Arnold. Green, L. E., Hedges, V. J. Schukken, Y. H., Blowey, R. W., and Packington, A. J. 2002. The impact of clinical lameness on the milk yield of dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 85:2250-2256. Green, L, E., Borkert, J., Monti, G., and Tadich, N. 2010. Associations between lesion-specific lameness and the milk yield of 1635 dairy cows from seven herds in the Xth region of Chile and implications for the management of dairy cows worldwide. Anim. Welfare 19:419 – 427 Juarez, S. T., Robinson, P. H., DePeters, E. J., and Price, E. O. 2003. Impact of lameness on behavior and productivity of lactating Holstein cows. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 83:1-14. King E. M., and Green, L. E. Assessment of farmer recognition and reporting of lameness in lowland sheep flocks in England. Anim. Welfare in press Leach, K. L., Whay, H. R., Maggs, C. M., Barker, Z. E., Paul, E. S., Bell, A. K., and Main D. C. J. 2010. Working towards a reduction in cattle lameness: 1. Understanding barriers to lameness control on dairy farms. Res. Vet. Sci. 89:311-317. Manske, T., Hultgren, J., and Bergsten, C. 2002. Prevalence and interrelationships of hoof lesions and lameness in Swedish dairy cows. Prev. Vet. Med. 54:247-263. Mazrier, H., Tal, S., Aizinbud, E., and Bargai, U. 2006. A field investigation of the use of the pedometer for the early detection of lameness in cattle. Can Vet. J. 47:883-886 O'Callaghan, K. A., Cripps, P. J., Downham, D. Y., and Murray, R. D. 2003. Subjective and objective assessment of pain and discomfort due to lameness in dairy cattle. Anim. Welfare. 12:605-610. Rasbash J., Browne W. J., Healy M., Cameron B., and Charlton C. 2005. MLwiN Version 2.02. Tadich, N., Flor, E., and Green, L. E. 2010 Associations between hoof lesions and locomotion score in 1098 unsound dairy cows Vet.J., 184:60 – 65 Walker, S. L., Smith, R.F., Routly, J. E., Jones, D. N., Morris, M. J., and Dobson, H. 2008. Lameness activity time budgets and estrus expression in dairy cattle. J. Dairy Sci. 91:4552- 4559 Warnick, L. D., Janssen, D., Guard, C. L., and Grohn, Y. T. 2001. The effect of lameness on milk production in dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 84:1988-1997 Whay, H. R., Main, D. C., Green, L. E., and Webster, A. J. 2003. Assessment of the welfare of dairy cattle using animal-based measurements: Direct observations and investigation of farm records. Vet. Rec. 153:197-202. Whay, H. R., Waterman, A. E., and Webster, A. J. 1997. Associations between locomotion, claw lesions and nociceptive threshold in dairy heifers during the peri-partum period. Vet. J. 154:155-161. Wilmink, J. B. M. 1987. Adjustment of test-day milk, fat and protein yields. Livest. Prod. Sci.. 16:335-348.
URI:	http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/38303

Request changes to a record

Actions (login required)

View Item