Blundell, N., Taylor-Phillips, Sian, Spitzer, D., Martin, Steven, Forde, I. and Clarke, Aileen, 1955-. (2011) Elective surgical referral guidelines : background educational material or essential shared decision making tool? : a survey of GPs' in England. BMC Family Practice, Vol.12 (No.1). p. 92. ISSN 1471-2296

Preview

PDF WRAP_Taylor_Phillips_1471-2296-12-92.pdf - Published Version - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader Download (274Kb)

Abstract

Background: To investigate general practitioners’ (GPs’) attitudes to guidelines for elective surgical referral in England. To understand their use of guidelines, and attitudes to shared decision making in the referral decision. Methods: A questionnaire was developed which investigated attitudes to and use of guidelines. It was given to a stratified random sample 30% (n = 310) drawn from GP lists of 10 English health districts (primary care trusts (PCTs)). GPs were invited to respond online, by telephone, fax or post. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics and backwards stepwise logistic regression. Results: Responses were representative of GPs in England, but (despite up to 6 contacts per non-responder) the overall response rate was 41.6% (n = 129; with the range across PCTs of 25-61%). Most responding GPs indicated support for referral guidelines but 18% reported that they had never used them. Less than three per cent reported use for most or all referral decisions. The odds of using guidelines decreased with increasing age, with a ten year increase in age associated with halving odds of use (OR = 0.53, 95%CI = 0.29-0.90). Over 50% of GPs wanted good access to electronic guidelines with expert information and advice on guideline availability. Almost all (>89%) GPs agreed with sharing referral decisions with patients. Female doctors (OR = 5.2, 95%CI: 1.02-26.3) were more likely to agree with this than male GPs as were those working in larger compared to small or single handed practices (OR = 5.3, 95%CI: 1.4-19.9). Conclusions: This group of responding GPs was supportive of guidelines but used them in different ways. Referral guidelines should have an educational component for background reading; include key messages for internalisation and application; and incorporate mechanisms to facilitate accessibility and appropriate shared decision making with patients.

Item Type:	Journal Article
Subjects:	R Medicine > RD Surgery
Divisions:	Faculty of Medicine > Warwick Medical School > Health Sciences Faculty of Medicine > Warwick Medical School
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH):	Surgery, Elective -- Decision making, Physicians (General practice) -- Attitudes
Journal or Publication Title:	BMC Family Practice
Publisher:	BioMed Central Ltd.
ISSN:	1471-2296
Date:	30 August 2011
Volume:	Vol.12
Number:	No.1
Page Range:	p. 92
Identification Number:	10.1186/1471-2296-12-92
Status:	Peer Reviewed
Publication Status:	Published
Access rights to Published version:	Open Access
Funder:	National Institute for Health Research (Great Britain) (NIHR)
Grant number:	08/1310/072 (NIHR)
References:	1. Coulter A: The Autonomous Patient: Ending Paternalism in Medical Care. London: Stationery Office (for the Nuffield Trust); 2002:128:ISBN 0-11, 703056-2. 2. Rosen R, Florin D, Dixon J: Access to Health Care. Context Report London; King’s Fund; 2001. 3. Gulliford M, Hughes D, Figeroa-Munoz J, et al: Access to Health Care - A Scoping Exercise. King’s College, London. NCCSDO. LSHTM; 2001. 4. Boivin A, Légaré F, Gagnon MP: Competing norms: Canadian rural family physicians’ perceptions of clinical practice guidelines and shared decision-making. J Health Serv Res Policy 2008, 13(2):79-84. 5. Schoen C, Osborn R, Doty MM, Squires D, Peugh J, Applebaum S: A survey of primary care physicians in eleven countries, 2009: perspectives on care, costs, and experiences. Health Aff (Millwood) 2009, 28(6):w1171-83, Epub 2009 Nov 2. 6. O’Donnell C: Variation in general practitioner referral rates: what can we learn from the literature? Fam Pract 2000, 17:462-71. 7. McColl E, Newton J, Hutchinson A: An agenda for change in referral - consensus from general practice. Br J Gen Pract 1994, 44(381):157-62. 8. Langley C, Faulkner A, Watkins C, Gray S, Harvey I: Use of guidelines in primary care–practitioners’ perspectives. Fam Pract 1998, 15:105-11. 9. Young JM, Ward JE: Evidence-based medicine in general practice: beliefs and barriers among Australian GPs. J Eval Clin Pract 2001, 7:201-10. 10. Coleman P, Nicholl J: Influence of evidence-based guidance on health policy and clinical practice in England. QualHealth Care 2001, 10:229-37. 11. Sturmberg JP: Implementing best practice guidelines: the influence of personal characteristics. J Eval Clin Pract 1999, 5:223-6. 12. Grilli R, Trisolini R, Labianca R, Zola P: Evolution of physicians’ attitudes towards practice guidelines. J Health Serv Res Policy 1999, 4:215-9. 13. Gupta L, Ward JE, Hayward RS: Clinical practice guidelines in general practice: a national survey of recall, attitudes and impact. Med J Aust 1997, 166:69-72. 14. Clarke A, Blundell N, Forde I, Musila N, Spitzer D, Naqvi S, Browne J: What is the effect of guidelines for referral for elective surgical procedures on appropriateness, health outcomes and costs? A systematic review. Quality and Safety in Health Care 2010, 19(3):187-94. 15. Woolf S, Grol R, Hutchinson A, et al: Clinical guidelines: potential benefits, limitations, and harms of clinical guidelines. BMJ 1999, 318:527e30. 16. Gabbay J, le May A: Evidence based guidelines or collectively constructed “mindlines?” Ethnographic study of knowledge management in primary care. BMJ 2004, 329:1013. 17. Worrall G, Chaulk P, Freake D: The effects of clinical practice guidelines on patient outcomes in primary care: a systematic review. CMAJ 1997, 156:1705e12. 18. Grimshaw J, Shirran L, Thomas R, et al: Changing provider behavior: an overview of systematic reviews of interventions. Med Care 2001, 39:II2e45. 19. Rogers EM, Rogers : Diffusion of innovations. 4 edition. Free Press, New York; 1995. 20. Cabana MD, R CS, Powe NR, Wu AW, Wilson MH, Abboud PA, Rubin HR: Why don’t physicians follow clinical practice guidelines? A framework for improvement. JAMA 1999, 282(15):1458-65. 21. Department of Health: Liberating the NHS: Equity and Excellence. DH 2010. 22. Clarke A, Musila N, van der Meulen J: The REFER Project - Realistic Effective Facilitation of Elective Referral for Elective Surgical Assessment (REFER)., NIHR NETSCC SDO 201008/1310/072. 23. Department of Health’s Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) for the years 2003 - 2004 now held by NHS Information Centre: [http://www.ic.nhs.uk/statisticsand- data-collections/hospital-care/hospital-activity-hospital-episodestatistics– hes], Accessed 03.02.10. 24. Krupat E, Rosenkranz SL, Yeager CM, Barnard K, Putnam SM, Inui TS: The practice orientations of physicians and patients: the effect of doctorpatient congruence on satisfaction. Patient Education and Counselling 2000, 39:49-59. 25. Ogden J, Ambrose L, Khadra A, Manthri S, Symons L, Vass A, et al: A questionnaire study of GPs’ and patients’ beliefs about the different components of patient centredness. Patient Education and Counselling 2002, 47:223-7. 26. Edwards A, Elwyn G: Involving patients in decision making and communicating risk: a longitudinal evaluation of doctors’ attitudes and confidence during a randomized trial. J Eval Clin Pract 2004, 10:431-7. 27. Buchan H, Lourey E, D’Este C, Sanson-Fisher R: Effectiveness of strategies to encourage general practitioners to accept an offer of free access to online evidence-based information: a randomised controlled trial. Implement Sci 2009, 4:68. 28. National Statistics: [http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/guide-method/classifications/ current-standard-classifications/national-statistics-2001-area-classifications/ cluster-summaries/output-areas/index.html], Accessed 17.11.10. 29. [http://www.nhs.uk/England/AuthoritiesTrusts/Pct/Default.aspx], Accessed 30.03.2006. 30. Hosmer D, Lemeshow S: A goodness-of-fit test for the multiple logistic regression model. Communications in Statistics 1980, , A10: 1043-1069. 31. Newcombe RG: Interval Estimation for the Difference Between Independent Proportions. Comparison of Eleven Methods Statistics in Medicine 1998, 17:873-890. 32. Musila N, Underwood M, McCaskie AW, Black N, Clarke A, van der Meulen JH: Referral recommendations for osteoarthritis of the knee incorporating patients’ preferences. Family Pract 2010, 1:68-74. 33. Edwards PJ, Roberts I, Clarke MJ, DiGuiseppi C, Wentz R, Kwan I, Cooper R, Felix LM, Pratap S: Methods to increase response to postal and electronic questionnaires. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2009, 3: Art. No.: MR000008, First published online: October 20. 2003. 34. Buchan H, Lourey E, D’Este C, Sanson-Fisher R: Effectiveness of strategies to encourage general practitioners to accept an offer of free access to online evidence-based information: a randomised controlled trial. Implement Sci 2009, 4:68. 35. Farmer AP, Légaré F, Turcot L, Grimshaw J, Harvey E, McGowan J, Wolf F: Printed educational materials: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews: Reviews John Wiley & Sons, Ltd Chichester, UK; 2008, 3. 36. Tsoukas H, Vladimourou E: What is organizational knowledge? Journal of Management Studies 2001, 38973-993.
URI:	http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/38326

Request changes to a record

Actions (login required)

View Item