Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Statistics
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login

Inferring individual differences in fMRI : finding brain regions with significant within subject correlation

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Purkayastha, Sumitra, Wager, Tor D. and Nichols, Thomas E.. (2008) Inferring individual differences in fMRI : finding brain regions with significant within subject correlation. Statistica Sinica, Vol.18 . pp. 1483-1500. ISSN 1017-0405

[img]
Preview
PDF
WRAP_nichols_Purkayastha_et_al.2008-INFERRING_INDIVIDUAL_DIFFERENCES_IN_FMRI_-_FINDING_BRAIN_REGIONS_WITH_SIGNIFICANT_WITHIN_SUBJECT_.pdf - Published Version - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader

Download (1684Kb)
Official URL: http://www3.stat.sinica.edu.tw/statistica/J18N4/J1...

Abstract

Functional magnetic resonance imaging studies answer questions about activation effects in populations of subjects. To begin with, this involves appropriate modelling of the fMRI data at the within-subject level. This is followed by extending the model to multiple subjects. There have been several attempts toward this extension, all of which have focused on inference on a single effect of interest (e.g., fMRI response for one type of working memory). However, the existing literature does not seem to say much about the relevant inferential procedures when multiple effects are of interest (e.g., response for four different types of working memory). In particular, the within subject dependence of one activation effect on another is an important issue with a multivariate repeated measures model. While most standard statistical methods regard such correlation as a nuisance, to be adjusted for and then ignored, we develop two simple and intuitive tests to make inference on the existence of such correlation. We demonstrate use of these tests by application to an fMRI study of attention switching. These tests are different not only from conventional tests for sphericity but also, more importantly, from the likelihood ratio test (LRT) of the relevant hypothesis. We also discuss what prompts us to look for tests different from the LRT.

Item Type: Journal Article
Subjects: Q Science > QA Mathematics
R Medicine > R Medicine (General)
R Medicine > RC Internal medicine > RC0321 Neuroscience. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatry
Divisions: Faculty of Science > Statistics
Faculty of Science > WMG (Formerly the Warwick Manufacturing Group)
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): Magnetic resonance imaging -- Mathematical models, Attention -- Testing
Journal or Publication Title: Statistica Sinica
Publisher: Academia Sinica * Institute of Statistical Science
ISSN: 1017-0405
Date: October 2008
Volume: Vol.18
Number of Pages: 18
Page Range: pp. 1483-1500
Status: Peer Reviewed
Publication Status: Published
Access rights to Published version: Open Access
References: Anderson, T. W. (2003). An Introduction to Multivariate Statistical Analysis. Third edition. Wiley, New Jersey. Badre, D., Poldrack, R. A., Pare-Blagoev, E. J., Insler, R. Z. and Wagner, A. D. (2005). Dissociable controlled retrieval and generalized selection mechanisms in ventrolateral prefrontal cortex. Neuron 47, 907-918. Beckmann, C. F., Jenkinson, M. and Smith, S. M. (2003). General multilevel linear modeling for group analysis in fMRI. NeuroImage 20, 1052-1063. Bullmore, E., Brammer, M., Williams, S.C.R., Rabe-Hesketh, S., Janot, N., David, A., Mellers, J., Howard, R. and Sham, P. (1996). Statistical methods of estimation and inference for functional MR image analysis. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 35, 261-277. Burgess, P. W., Alderman, N., Evans, J., Emslie, H. and Wilson, B. A. (1998). The ecological validity of tests of executive function. J. Internat. Neuropsychological Soc. 4, 547-558. Chernoff, H. (1954). On the distribution of the likelihood ratio. Ann. Math. Statist. 25, 573-578. Cox, R. W. (1996). AFNI: software for analysis and visualization of functional magnetic resonance neuroimages. Comput. Biomed. Res. 29, 162-173. Dempster, F. N. and Corkill, A. J. (1999). Individual differences in susceptibility to interference and general cognitive ability. Acta Psychologica 101, 395-416. Duncan, J., Burgess, P. and Emslie, H. (1995). Fluid intelligence after frontal lobe lesions. Neuropsychologia 33, 261-268. Duncan, J., Emslie, H., Williams, P., Johnson, R. and Freer, C. (1996). Intelligence and the frontal lobe: The organization of goal-directed behavior. Cognitive Psychology 30, 257-303. Friston, K. J., Penny, W., Phillips, C., Kiebel, S., Hinton, G. and Ashburner, J. (2002). Classical and Bayesian inference in neuroimaging: theory. NeuroImage 16, 465-483. Genovese, C. R., Lazar, N. A. and Nichols, T. (2002). Thresholding of statistical maps in functional neuroimaging using the false discovery rate. NeuroImage 15, 870-878. Holmes, A. and Friston, K. (1998). Generalisability, random effects and population inference. Fourth International Conference on Functional Mapping of the Human Brain, NeuroImage, Vol. 7, p. S754. De Leeuw, J. (2006). Personal communication. Kane, M. J. and Engle, R. W. (2003). Working-memory capacity and the control of attention: The contributions of goal neglect, response competition, and task set to Stroop interference. J. Experimental Psychology: General 132, 47-70. Laird, N. M. and Ware, J. H. (1982). Random-effects models for longitudinal data. Biometrics 38, 963-974. Mayr, U. and Kliegl, R. (2000). Task-set switching and long-term memory retrieval. J. Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition 26, 1124-1140. Mechelli, A., Penny, W. D., Price, C. J., Gitelman, D. R. and Friston, K. J. (2002). Effective connectivity and intersubject variability: using a multisubject network to test differences and commonalities. NeuroImage 17, 1459-1469. Mesulam, M. M., Nobre, A. C., Kim, Y. H., Parrish, T. B. and Gitelman, D. R. (2001). Heterogeneity of cingulate contributions to spatial attention. NeuroImage 13, 1065-1072. Miyake, A., Friedman, N. P., Emerson, M. J., Witzki, A. H., Howerter, A. and Wager, T. D. (2000). The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex “Frontal Lobe” tasks: a latent variable analysis. Cognit Psychol 41, 49-100. Nee, D. E., Wager, T. D. and Jonides, J. (2007). A meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies of interference resolution. Cogn. Affect. Behav. Neurosci. in press. Neter, J., Kutner, M. H., Wasserman, W. and Nachtsheim, C. J. (1996). Applied Linear Statistical Models. 4th edition. McGraw-Hill/Irwin. Pandya, D. N., Van Hoesen, G. W. and Mesulam, M. M. (1981). Efferent connections of the cingulate gyrus in the rhesus monkey. Exp. Brain Res. 42, 319-330. Penny, W. D., Stephan, K. E., Mechelli, A. and Friston, K. J. (2004). Modelling functional integration: a comparison of structural equation and dynamic causal models. NeuroImage, 23 Suppl 1, S264-274. Perlman, M. (2006). Personal communication. Rabbitt, P. and Lowe, C. (2000). Patterns of cognitive ageing. Psychol. Res. 63, 308-316. Robbins, T. W., James, M., Owen, A. M., Sahakian, B. J., Lawrence, A. D., McInnes, L., et al. (1998). A study of performance on tests from the CANTAB battery sensitive to frontal lobe dysfunction in a large sample of normal volunteers: implications for theories of executive functioning and cognitive aging. Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery. J. Int. Neuropsychol. Soc. 4, 474-490. Rousseeuw, P. J. (1984). Least median of squares regression. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 79, 871- 880. Rubinstein, J. S., Meyer, D. E. and Evans, J. E. (2001). Executive control of cognitive processes in task switching. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 27, 763-797. Salthouse, T. A., Fristoe, N., McGuthry, K. E. and Hambrick, D. Z. (1998). Relation of task switching to speed, age, and fluid intelligence. Psychol. Aging 13, 445-461. Schacter, D. L., Buckner, R. L., Koutstaal, W., Dale, A. M. and Rosen, B. R. (1997). Late onset of anterior prefrontal activity during true and false recognition: an event-related fMRI study. NeuroImage 6, 259-269. Self, S. G. and Liang, K.-Y. (1987). Asymptotic properties of maximum likelihood estimators and likelihood ratio tests under nonstandard conditions. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 82, 605- 610. Smith, S. M., Jenkinson, M., Woolrich, M. W., Beckmann, C. F., Behrens, T. E. and Johansen- Berg, H. et al. (2004). Advances in functional and structural MR image analysis and implementation as FSL. Neuroimage 23 Suppl 1, S208-219. Steiger, J. H. (1980). Testing pattern hypotheses on correlation matrices: Alternative statistics and some empirical results. Multivariate Behavioral Research 15(3), 335-352. Steiger, J. H. (2005). Comparing correlations. In Contemporary Psychometrics: A festschrift for Roderick P. McDonald. (Edited by A. Maydeu-Olivares and J. J. McArdle), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates: Mahwah, New Jersey. Wager, T. D., Jonides, J. and Reading, S. (2004). Neuroimaging studies of shifting attention: a meta-analysis. NeuroImage 22, 1679-1693. Wager, T. D., Jonides, J. and Smith, E. E. (2006). Individual differences in multiple types of shifting attention. Memory & Cognition. 34, 1730-1743. Wager, T. D., Jonides, J., Smith, E. E. and Nichols, T. E. (2005a). Towards a taxonomy of attention-shifting: Individual differences in fMRI during multiple shift types. Cogn. Affect. Behav. Neurosci. 5, 127-143. Wager, T. D., Keller, M. C., Lacey, S. C., and Jonides, J. (2005b). Increased sensitivity in neuroimaging analyses using robust regression. NeuroImage 26, 99-113. Wager, T. D. and Smith, E. E. (2003). Neuroimaging studies of working memory: a metaanalysis. Cogn. Affect. Behav. Neurosci. 3, 255-274. Wager, T. D., Sylvester, C. Y., Lacey, S. C., Nee, D. E., Franklin, M. and Jonides, J. (2005c). Common and unique components of response inhibition revealed by fMRI. NeuroImage 27, 323-340. Ward, G., Roberts, M. J. and Phillips, L. H. (2001). Task-switching costs, Stroop-costs, and executive control: A correlational study. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology 54A, 491-511. Woolrich, M. W., Ripley, B. D., Brady, J. M. and Smith, S. M. (2001). Temporal autocorrelation in univariate linear modelling of fMRI data. NeuroImage 14, 1370-1386. Woolrich, M. W., Behrens, T. E. J., Beckmann, C. F., Jenkinson, M., and Smith, S.M. (2004). Multilevel linear modelling for fMRI group analysis using Bayesian inference. NeuroImage 21, 1732-1747. Worsley, K. J. and Friston, K. J. (1995). Analysis of fMRI time series revisited – again. NeuroImage 2, 173-181. Worsley, K. J., Liao, C. H., Aston, J., Petre, V., Duncan, G. H., Morales, F., and Evans, A.C. (2002). A general statistical analysis for fMRI data. NeuroImage 15, 1-15.
URI: http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/38355

Data sourced from Thomson Reuters' Web of Knowledge

Request changes to a record

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Document Downloads

More statistics for this item...
twitter

Email us: publications@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us