Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Statistics
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login

Tullock challenges : happiness, revolutions, and democracy

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Frey, Bruno S.. (2011) Tullock challenges : happiness, revolutions, and democracy. Public Choice, Vol.148 (No.3-4). pp. 269-281. ISSN 0048-5829

[img] PDF
WRAP_Frey_021111-c_526_epcstullock20110421_lv.pdf - Accepted Version
Restricted to Repository staff only until 22 July 2012. - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader

Download (230Kb)
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11127-011-9821-z

Abstract

Gordon Tullock is one of the most important of the founders and contributors to Public Choice. Two innovations are typical "Tullock Challenges." The first relates to method: the measurement of subjective well-being, or happiness. The second relates to digital social networks, such as Facebook, Twitter, and to some extent Google. Both innovations lead to strong incentives by governments to manipulate the policy outcomes. In general, "What is important will be manipulated by the government." To restrain government manipulation, one has to turn to Constitutional Economics and increase the possibilities for direct popular participation and federalism or introduce random mechanisms.

Item Type: Journal Article
Subjects: H Social Sciences > HB Economic Theory
J Political Science > JC Political theory
Divisions: Faculty of Social Sciences > Warwick Business School > Behavioural Science
Faculty of Social Sciences > Warwick Business School
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): Social choice, Online social networks -- Government policy, Happiness -- Testing -- Government policy
Journal or Publication Title: Public Choice
Publisher: Springer New York LLC
ISSN: 0048-5829
Date: 22 July 2011
Volume: Vol.148
Number: No.3-4
Number of Pages: 13
Page Range: pp. 269-281
Identification Number: 10.1007/s11127-011-9821-z
Status: Peer Reviewed
Publication Status: Published
Access rights to Published version: Restricted or Subscription Access
Description: Given as the first Tullock Lecture, European Public Choice Conference, Rennes, 28 April - 1 May 2011
References: Benz, Matthias and Alois Stutzer (2004). Are voters better informed when they have a larger say in politics? Public Choice 119: 31-59. Bernholz, Peter (1991). The Constitution of Totalitarianism. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics 147: 425-440. Bernholz, Peter (1997). Ideology, Sects, State and Totalitarianism: A General Theory. In: H. Maier and M. Schaefer (eds), Totalitarismus und Politische Religionen. Paderborn: Schoeningh: 271-298. Buchanan, James M. and Gordon Tullock (1962). The Calculus of Consent. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. Buchstein, Hubertus (2009). Bausteine fuer eine aleatorische Demokratietheorie. Leviathan 37: 327-352. Burnheim, John (1985). Is Democracy Possible? The Alternative to Electoral Politics. Oxford: Polity Press. Campbell, Donald T. (1976). Assessing the impact of planned social change. Occasional paper No 8, Social Research and Public Policies. Dortmouth College, The Public Affairs Center. Dolan, Paul, Tessa Peasgood and Mathew White (2008). Do we really know what makes us happy? A review of the economic literature on the factors associated with subjective well-being. Journal of Economic Psychology. 29: 94-122. Dafflon, Bernard and Sergio Rossi (1999). Public accounting fudges towards EMU: a first empirical survey and some public choice considerations. Public Choice 101(1-2): 59- 84. Easterlin, Richard A. (1974). Does Economic Growth Improve the Human Lot? Some Empirical Evidence. In: Paul A. David and Melvin W. Reder (eds), Nations and Households in Economic Growth: Essays in Honour of Moses Abramowitz. New York: Academic Press. Eichenberger, Reiner and Mark Schelker (2006). Independent and competing agencies: An effective way to control government. Public Choice 130: 79 – 98. Economist (2011). Politics and the internet. Caught in the net. January 8th, 74-75. Economist (2011). Internet blackouts. Reaching for the kill switch. February 12th, 61-62. Espeland, Wandy M. and Michael Sander (2007). Rankings and reactivity: How pubic measures create social worlds. American Journal of Sociology 113: 1-40. Forte, Francesco (2001). The Maastricht “Excessive Deficit” Rules and Creative Accounting. In: Mudambi, Ram, Pietro Navarra and Giuseppe Sobbrio (eds), Rules and reason: perspectives on constitutional political economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Frank, Robert (1999). Luxury Fever: Why Money Fails to Satisfy in an Era of Excess. New York: Free Press. Frey, Bruno S. (1969). Wahrscheinlichkeiten als gesellschaftliche Entscheidungsregel. Wirtschaft und Recht 21: 3-15. Frey, Bruno S. (2008). Happiness: A Revolution in Economics. Cambridge and London: The MIT Press. Frey, Bruno S. and Alois Stutzer (2000). Happiness, Economy and Institutions. The Economic Journal. 110: 918 – 938. Frey, Bruno S. and Alois Stutzer (2002a). The Economics of Happiness. World Economics, 3(1): 25-41. Frey, Bruno S. and Alois Stutzer (2002b). What Can Economists Learn from Happiness Research? Journal of Economic Literature. 40(2): 402 – 435. Frey, Bruno S. and Alois Stutzer (2010). Happiness and Public Choice. Public Choice144: 557-573. Frey, Bruno S. and Margit Osterloh (2010). Evaluations: hidden costs, questionable benefits and superior alternatives. In: Jansen, T; van den Brink, G; Kole, J. Professional pride – a powerful force. The Hague, 175-196. Frey, Bruno S. and Reiner Eichenberger (1999). FOCJ: Competitive governments for Europe. International Review of Law and Economics, 16(3): 315-327. Gibbard, Allan (1973). Manipulation of Voting Schemes: A General Result. Econometrica 41(4): 587-601 Goodhart, Charles (1975). Monetary relationships: A new form of Threadneedle street. Papers in Monetary Economics 1, Reserve Bank of Australia. Habermas, Jürgen (1996). Between Facts and Norms – Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. London: Polity. Intriligator, M. D. (1973). A Probabilistic Model of Social Choice. Review of Economic Studies 40: 553-560. Jacob, Brian A. and Levitt, Steven D. (2003). Rotten Apples: An Investigation of the Prevalence and Predictions of Teacher Cheating. Quarterly Journal of Economics 118: 843-877. Kahneman, Daniel, Ed Diener, and Norbert Schwarz (eds) (1999). Well-being: the foundations of hedonic psychology. New York: Russell Sage Foundation. Kern, Holger Lutz and Jens Hainmueller (2009). Opium for the Masses: How Foreign Media Can Stabilize Authoritarian Regimes. Political Analysis 17: 377-399. Kirchgässner, Gebhard, Lars P. Feld and Marcel R. Savioz (1999). Die direkte Demokratie: Modern, erfolgreich, entwicklungs- und exportfähig. Basel, Munich: Helbing und Lichtenhahn/Vahlen. Kurrild-Klitgaard, Peter (2000). The Constitutional Economics of Autocratic Succession. Public Choice 103: 63-84. Layard, Richard (2005). Happiness: Lessons from a New Science. New York: Penguin Press. Layard, Richard (2007). Happiness and Public Policy: A Challenge to the Profession. In: Bruno S. Frey and Alois Stutzer (eds), Economics and Psychology:A Promising New Cross-Dsiciplinary Field. Cambridge, Mass. and London: MIT Press: 155-167. Lucas, R. E. (1976). Econometric Policy Evaluation: A Critique. In: Karl Brunner and Alan H. Meltzer (eds), Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy. The Phillips Curve and Labor Markets. New York: North Holland: 19-46. Martin, Brian (1995-6). Democracy without Elections. Social Anarchism 21: 18-51. Morozov, Evgeny (2010). The Net Delusion. How Not to Liberate the World. London: Allen Lane. Mueller, Dennis C. (1978). Voting by Veto. Journal of Public Economics 10(1): 57-75. Mueller, Dennis C. (2003). Public Choice III. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Oswald, Andrew J. (1997). Happiness and Economic Performance. Economic Journal 107(445): 1815-31. Power, Michael (1997). The Audit Society: Rituals of Verification. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Rousseau, Jean-Jacques (1762/1937). Du contrat social. Paris: Garnier. Satterthwaite, Mark (1975). Strategy-Proofness and Arrow`s Conditions: Existence and Correspondence Theorems for Voting Procedures and Social Welfare Functions. Journal of Economic Theory 10: 187-217. Strathern, Marilyn (2000). Audit Cultures: Anthropological Studies in Accountability, Ethics and Academia. London: Routledge. Szpiro, George G. (2010). Numbers Rule. The Vexing Mathmematics if Democracy from Plato to the Present. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press. Tullock, Gordon (1971). The Paradox of Revolutions. Public Choice 11: 89-100. Tullock, Gordon (1974). The Social Dilemma: Economics of War and Revolution. Blacksburg: Center for Study of Public Choice. Tullock, Gordon (1987). Autocracy. Dordrecht: Kluwer. Ura, Karma and Karma Galay, eds. (2004). Gross National Happiness and Development. Centre for Bhutan Studies. Van Praag, Bernard and Ada Ferrer-i-Carbonell (2004). Happiness quantified: a satisfaction calculus approach. New York: Oxford University Press. Von Hagen, Jürgen and Guntram B. Wolff (2006). What do deficits tell us about debt? Empirical evidence on creative accounting with fiscal rules in the EU. Discussion Papers 148, SFB/TR 15 Governance and the Efficiency of Economic Systems, Free University of Berlin, Humboldt University of Berlin, University of Bonn, University of Mannheim, University of Munich. Wintrobe, Ronald (1998). The Political Economy of Dictatorship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
URI: http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/38383

Data sourced from Thomson Reuters' Web of Knowledge

Request changes to a record

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Document Downloads

More statistics for this item...
twitter

Email us: publications@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us