Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Statistics
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login

Nonaxisymmetric anisotropy of solar wind turbulence

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Turner, A. J. (Andrew J.), Gogoberidze, Grigol, Chapman, Sandra C., Hnat, B. and Müller, W.-C.. (2011) Nonaxisymmetric anisotropy of solar wind turbulence. Physical Review Letters, Vol.107 (No.9). Article no. 095002 . ISSN 0031-9007

Full text not available from this repository.
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.095002

Abstract

A key prediction of turbulence theories is frame-invariance, and in magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) turbulence, axisymmetry of fluctuations with respect to the background magnetic field. Paradoxically the power in fluctuations in the turbulent solar wind are observed to be ordered with respect to the bulk macroscopic flow as well as the background magnetic field. Here, nonaxisymmetry across the inertial and dissipation ranges is quantified using in situ observations from Cluster. The observed inertial range nonaxisymmetry is reproduced by a "fly through" sampling of a direct numerical simulation of MHD turbulence. Furthermore, fly through sampling of a linear superposition of transverse waves with axisymmetric fluctuations generates the trend in nonaxisymmetry with power spectral exponent. The observed nonaxisymmetric anisotropy may thus simply arise as a sampling effect related to Taylor's hypothesis and is not related to the plasma dynamics itself.

Item Type: Journal Article
Subjects: Q Science > QB Astronomy
Q Science > QC Physics
Divisions: Faculty of Science > Physics
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): Interplanetary magnetic fields, Anisotropy, Solar wind, Magnetohydrodynamic waves, Heliosphere (Astrophysics)
Journal or Publication Title: Physical Review Letters
Publisher: American Physical Society
ISSN: 0031-9007
Date: August 2011
Volume: Vol.107
Number: No.9
Page Range: Article no. 095002
Identification Number: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.095002
Status: Peer Reviewed
Publication Status: Published
Access rights to Published version: Restricted or Subscription Access
Funder: Science and Technology Facilities Council (Great Britain) (STFC)
References: [1] R. Bruno and V. Carbone, Living Rev. Solar Phys. 2, 4 (2005). [2] A. S. Monin and A. M. Yaglom, Statistical Fluid Mechanics (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1975). [3] P. Goldreich and S. Sridhar, Astrophys. J. 438, 763 (1995). [4] S. Boldyrev, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 115002 (2006). [5] G. Gogoberidze, Phys. Plasmas 14, 022304 (2007). [6] W.-C. Mueller and R. Grappin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 114502 (2005). [7] J. Maron and P. Goldreich, Astrophys. J. 554, 1175 (2001). [8] J.W. Belcher and L. Davis, J. Geophys. Res. 76, 3534 (1971). [9] S. C. Chapman, B. Hnat, Geophys. Res. Lett. 34, L17103 (2007). [10] Y. Narita et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 171101 (2010). [11] F. Sahraoui et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 131101 (2010). [12] R. T. Wicks et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 045001 (2011). [13] R. M. Nicol, S. C. Chapman, and R. O. Dendy, Astrophys. J. 703, 2138 (2009). [14] S. C. Chang and A. Nishida, Astrophys. Space Sci. 23, 301 (1973); J.W. Belcher and C.V. Solodyna, J. Geophys. Res. 80, 181 (1975); L. F. Burlaga and J. M. Turner, J. Geophys. Res. 81, 73 (1976); B. Bavassano et al., Sol. Phys. 78, 373 (1982); E. Marsch and C.-Y. Tu, J. Geophys. Res. 95, 8211 (1990); L.W. Klein, D. A.Roberts, and M. L. Goldstein, J. Geophys. Res. 96, 3779 (1991). [15] S. Perri et al., J. Geophys. Res. 114, A02102 (2009). [16] B. U. O. Sonnerup, L. J. Cahill, J. Geophys. Res. 72, 171 (1967). [17] J. H. Volk and W. Aplers, Astrophys. Space Sci. 20, 267 (1973). [18] R. Grappin, M. Velli, and A. Mangeney, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 2190 (1993). [19] J. Saur and J.W. Bieber, J. Geophys. Res. 104, 9975 (1999). [20] G. I. Taylor, Proc. R. Soc. A 164, 476 (1938). [21] Y. Voitenko and M. Goossens, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 135003 (2005). [22] T. Tatsuno et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 015003 (2009). [23] C. H. K. Chen et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 255002 (2010). [24] O. Alexandrova et al., J. Geophys. Res. 109, A05207 (2004). [25] J. J. Podesta, Astrophys. J. 698, 986 (2009). [26] T. S. Horbury, M. Forman, and S. Oughton, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 175005 (2008). [27] R. J. Leamon et al., J. Geophys. Res. 103, 4775 (1998). [28] K. H. Kiyani et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 075006 (2009). [29] M. A. Forman, R. T. Wicks, and T. S. Horbury, Astrophys. J. 733, 76 (2011).
URI: http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/38492

Data sourced from Thomson Reuters' Web of Knowledge

Request changes to a record

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item
twitter

Email us: publications@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us