The Library

Form-finding as a modelling tool for shaping mechanical components: a feasibility case study of an axial-flow compressor blade

Tools

Lewis, W. J., Brew, J. S., Bryanston-Cross, P. and Nawasra, J. S.. (2011) Form-finding as a modelling tool for shaping mechanical components: a feasibility case study of an axial-flow compressor blade. Engineering Structures, Vol.33 (No.9). pp. 2612-2620. ISSN 0141-0296

Preview

PDF (Article)
WRAP_Lewis_Blade_paper_final_rev2.pdf - Accepted Version - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
Download (226Kb)

Preview

PDF (Figure 1)
WRAP_Lewis_Figures_rev7_Blade_paper_rev.pdf - Supplemental Material - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
Download (1382Kb)

Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2011.05.008

Abstract

This paper reports on an exploratory study to assess the capability of a novel, form-finding methodology for generating optimal shapes of shell-type structures subjected to complex load regimes, using an axial-flow, compressor blade as a case study. The methodology exploits the natural principle of 'form follows force', in which the structural form is shaped according to the forces acting on it. Such forms, or objects, which are found in nature, are known to have optimal strength and stiffness characteristics for a predominant load regime. Our methodology makes use of a direct relationship between form and force, offered by the Laplace-Young equation that describes shapes of minimal surface membranes, such as soap films. Unlike structural optimisation in which the form is modified within its initially prescribed shape, form-finding literally finds the shape within prescribed boundary conditions. This is the first application of the methodology to modelling mechanical components, such as a compressor blade. The blade shapes obtained by this method correspond, in the first instance, to a minimal form and, subsequently, a minimal form subjected to a known (empirically determined) pressure profile. The behaviour of the blades is studied under a variety of loads and includes modal analysis. In view of the methodology adopted, attention is directed to structural performance. The results, compared against a 'control' blade produced by a conventional design/optimisation method are very encouraging; they indicate that the proposed methodology has the potential to improve significantly the current blade design process.

[error in script] [error in script]

Item Type:	Journal Article
Subjects:	T Technology > TJ Mechanical engineering and machinery
Divisions:	Faculty of Science > Engineering
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH):	Gas-turbines -- Blades -- Design and construction
Journal or Publication Title:	Engineering Structures
Publisher:	Elsevier Science Ltd.
ISSN:	0141-0296
Date:	September 2011
Volume:	Vol.33
Number:	No.9
Number of Pages:	9
Page Range:	pp. 2612-2620
Identification Number:	10.1016/j.engstruct.2011.05.008
Status:	Peer Reviewed
Publication Status:	Published
Access rights to Published version:	Restricted or Subscription Access
Funder:	Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC)
Grant number:	GRS56016/1 (EPSRC)
References:	1. D’Arcy Thomson, W., “On Growth and Form”. Cambridge University Press, 1917. 2. Mattheck C., "Why they Grow, How They Grow : The Mechanics of Trees". Academic Publishers. Arboricultural Journal, 1990, Vol. 14, pp 1-17. 3. Carter, T. J., “Common Failure in Gas Turbine Blades”. Engineering Failure Analysis, Elsevier, 2005, Vol. 12, Issue 2, pp 237-247. 4. Teichman, H. C. and Tandros, R. N., “Analytical and Experimental Simulation of Fan Blade Behaviour and Damage under Bird Impact”. Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbine and Power, 1991, Vol. 113, issue 4, pp 582-594. 5. Kerrebrock, K. J. et al, “Design and Test of an Aspirated Counter Rotating Fan” Journal of Turbomachinery, 2008, vol. 130, issue 2, 0210048 (8 pages). 6. Abumeri, G.H., Latife, K., and Chamis, C.C., “Composite Fan Blade Design for Advanced Engine Concepts”. NASA Technical Report No E-14383, 2004, NASA/TM-2004-212943. 7. Horlock, J. H., and Denton, J. D., “A Review of Some Early Design Practice Using Computational Fluid Dynamics and a Current Perspective”. Journal of Turbomachinery, 2005 Vol. 127, Issue 1, pp 5-13. 8. Denton, J. D., and Dawes, W N., “Computational Fluid Dynamics for Turbomachinery Design”. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part C: Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science, 1999, Vol. 213, No. 2 . pp 107-124. 9. Chen, Y.M. and CL Wei, C.L., “Computer-aided Feature-based Design for Net Shape Manufacturing”. Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 1997, Vol.10, No.2, Pp 147-164. 10. Isenberg, C., "The Science of Soap-films and Soap-bubbles". Tieto Ltd., 1978, pp 88,170. 11. Laplace, P.S., “Mécanique Céleste”. Impr. Imperiale, supplement to 10th Book, 1806. See also Laplace P. S. “Oeuvres”. In English, annotated translation by N. Bowditch, Little and Brown, 1839, Vol. IV. 12. Young, T., “A course of Lectures on Natural Philosophy and the Mechanical Arts”, publ. by J. Johnson, 1807, Vol. I, pp. 468-469. 13. Brew, J. S., and Lewis, W. J., “Computational Form-finding of Tension Membrane Structures. Part I: Cubic Splines in Finding Minimal Surface Membranes”. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, Vol. 56, 2003, pp 651-668. 14. Brew, J. S., and Lewis, W. J., “Tension Membranes Modelled by Curvi-linear Bicubic Splines”. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, Vol. 72, 2007, pp 1-21. 15. Lewis, W. J., “Tension Structures. Form and behaviour”. Thomas Telford, 2003, chap.4. 16. Lewis, W. J., Jones, M. S., and Rushton, K. R., “Dynamic Relaxation Algorithm of the Non-linear Response of Pretensioned Cable Roofs”. Computers & Structures, Vol. 18, No. 6, 1984, pp 989-997.
URI:	http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/38525