Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Statistics
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login

Molecular dynamics study of nanoparticle stability at liquid interfaces : effect of nanoparticle-solvent interaction and capillary waves

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Cheung, David L.. (2011) Molecular dynamics study of nanoparticle stability at liquid interfaces : effect of nanoparticle-solvent interaction and capillary waves. The Journal of Chemical Physics, Vol.135 (No.5). 054704. ISSN 0021-9606

[img]
Preview
PDF
WRAP_Cheung_0380769-ch-251011-ljnanoparticle.pdf - Accepted Version - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader

Download (437Kb)
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.3618553

Abstract

While the interaction of colloidal particles (sizes in excess of 100 nm) with liquid interfaces may be understood in terms of continuum models, which are grounded in macroscopic properties such as surface and line tensions, the behaviour of nanoparticles at liquid interfaces may be more complex. Recent simulations [D. L. Cheung and S. A. F. Bon, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 066103 (2009)] of nanoparticles at an idealised liquid-liquid interface showed that the nanoparticle-interface interaction range was larger than expected due, in part, to the action of thermal capillary waves. In this paper, molecular dynamics simulations of a Lennard-Jones nanoparticle in a binary Lennard-Jones mixture are used to confirm that these previous results hold for more realistic models. Furthermore by including attractive interactions between the nanoparticle and the solvent, it is found that the detachment energy decreases as the nanoparticle-solvent attraction increases. Comparison between the simulation results and recent theoretical predictions [H. Lehle and M. Oettel, J. Phys. Condens. Matter 20, 404224 (2008)] shows that for small particles the incorporation of capillary waves into the predicted effective nanoparticle-interface interaction improves agreement between simulation and theory.

Item Type: Journal Article
Subjects: Q Science > QD Chemistry
Divisions: Faculty of Science > Chemistry
Faculty of Science > Centre for Scientific Computing
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): Nanoparticles -- Mathematical models, Liquid-liquid interfaces -- Mathematical models, Solvents -- Mathematical models
Journal or Publication Title: The Journal of Chemical Physics
Publisher: American Institute of Physics
ISSN: 0021-9606
Date: 7 August 2011
Volume: Vol.135
Number: No.5
Page Range: 054704
Identification Number: 10.1063/1.3618553
Status: Peer Reviewed
Publication Status: Published
Access rights to Published version: Restricted or Subscription Access
Funder: European Research Council (ERC), University of Warwick, Leverhulme Trust (LT)
Grant number: ECF/2010/0254 (LT)
References: 1 F. Bresme and M. Oettel, J. Phys. Condens. Matt. 19, 413101/1 (2007). 2 W. H. Binder, Angew. Chemie Int. Ed. 44, 5172 (2005). 3 S. Cauvin, P. J. Colver, and S. A. F. Bon, Macromolecules 38, 7887 (2005). 4 P. S. Clegg, J. Phys. Condens. Matt. 20, 113101/1 (2008). 5 M. B. Linder, Curr. Opin. Coll. Interf. Sci. 14, 356 (2009). 6 J. T. Russell, Y. Lin, A. B¨oker, L. Su, P. Carl, H. Zettl, J. He, K. Sill, R. Tangirala, T. Emrick, K. Littrell, P. Thiyagarajan, D. Cookson, A. Fery, Q. Wang, and T. P. Russell, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 44, 2420 (2005). 7 P. Finkle, H. D. Draper, and J. H. Hildebrand, J. Amer. Chem. Soc. 45, 278 (1923). 8 P. Pieranski, Phys. Rev. Lett. 45, 569 (1980). 9 B. P. Binks and S. O. Lumsdon, Langmuir 16, 8622 (2000). 10 B. P. Binks and J. H. Clint, Langmuir 18, 1270 (2002). 11 R. Aveyard and J. H. Clint, Journal of the Chemical Society, Faraday Transactions 92, 85 (1996). 12 H. Lehle and M. Oettel, J. Phys. Condens. Matt. 20, 404224 (2008). 13 M. Oettel and S. Dietrich, Langmuir 24, 1425 (2008). 14 H. Lehle, M. Oettel, and S. Dietrich, EPL 75, 174 (2006). 15 F. Bresme and N. Quirke, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 3791 (1998). 16 F. Bresme and N. Quirke, J. Chem. Phys. 110, 3536 (1999). 17 F. Bresme and N. Quirke, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 1, 2149 (1999). 18 D. L. Cheung and S. A. F. Bon, Physical Review Letters 102, 066103/1 (2009). 19 D. L. Cheung and S. A. F. Bon, Soft Matter 5, 3969 (2009). 20 R. J. K. Udayana Ranatunga, R. J. B. Kalescky, C.-c. Chiu, and S. O. Nielsen, J. Phys. Chem. C 114, 12151 (2010). 21 F. Bresme, H. Lehle, and M. Oettel, J. Chem. Phys. 130, 214711/1 (2009). 22 L. L. Dai, R. Sharma, and W. C.-Y., Langmuir 21, 2641 (2005). 23 Y. Song, M. Luo, and L. L. Dai, Langmuir 26, 5 (2010). 24 D. L. Cheung, Chem. Phys. Lett. 495, 55 (2010). 25 P. Hopkins, A. J. Archer, and R. Evans, J. Chem. Phys. 131, 124704 (2009). 26 M. Zeng, J. Mi, and C. Zhong, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 13, 3932 (2011). 27 B. Widom and J. S. Rowlinson, J. Chem. Phys. 52, 1670 (1970). 28 M. Oettel, A. Domingeuz, and S. Dietrich, Phys. Rev. E 71, 051401 (2005). 29 Y.-M. Ban, R. Tasseff, and D. Kopelevich, Mol. Sim. 37, 525 (2011). 30 M. E. Flatte, A. A. Kornyshev, and M. Urbakh, J. Phys. Condens. Matt. 20, 073102 (2008). 31 F. Wang and D. Landau, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 2050 (2001). 32 G. Torrie and J. Valleau, J. Comp. Phys. 23, 187 (1977). 33 S. Park and K. Schulten, J. Chem. Phys. 120, 5946 (2004). 34 A. Laio and F. L. Gervasio, Rep. Prog. Phys. 71, 126601 (2008). 35 E. Darve, D. Rodr´ıguez-G´omez, and A. Pohorille, J. Chem. Phys. 128, 144120 (2008). 36 R. Everaers and M. Ejtehadi, Phys. Rev. E 67, 041710 (2003). 37 P. J. in’t Veld, M. K. Petersen, and G. S. Grest, Phys. Rev. E 79, 021401 (2009). 38 S. Kumar, J. M. Rosenberg, D. Bouzida, R. H. Swendsen, and P. A. Kollman, J. Comp. Chem. 13, 1011 (1992). 39 S. Plimpton, J. Comp. Phys. 117, 1 (1995), http://lammps.sandia.gov. 40 W. G. Hoover, Phys. Rev. A 31, 1695 (1985). 41 J. H. Irving and J. G. Kirkwood, J. Chem. Phys. 18, 817 (1950). 42 K. Du, E. Glogowski, T. Emrick, T. P. Russell, and A. D. Dinsmore, Langmuir 26, 12518 (2010). 43 B. P. Binks, Curr. Opin. Coll. Inter. Sci. 7, 21 (2002). 44 L. Schimmele, M. Napiorkowski, and S. Dietrich, J. Chem. Phys. 127, 164715 (2007). 45 Y. Djikaev, J. Chem. Phys. 123, 184704 (2005). 46 K. Mecke and S. Dietrich, Phys. Rev. E 59, 6676 (1999). 47 S. A. Safran, Statistical thermodynamics of surfaces, interfaces, and membranes (Persus, Cambridge, 1994).
URI: http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/38534

Data sourced from Thomson Reuters' Web of Knowledge

Request changes to a record

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Document Downloads

More statistics for this item...
twitter

Email us: publications@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us