The Library

Habitus, reflexividade e realismo

Tools

Archer, Margaret S.. (2011) Habitus, reflexividade e realismo. Dados: revista de ciencias sociais, Vol.54 (No.1). pp. 157-206. ISSN 0011-5258

Preview

PDF
WRAP_Archer__05.pdf - Published Version - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial.
Download (378Kb)

Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0011-52582011000100005

Abstract

Many scholars continue to ascribe a fundamental role to routine action in social theory and defend the continuing relevance of Bourdieu's concept of habitus. Meanwhile, the majority recognize the importance of reflexivity. In this article, Archer examines three versions of efforts to render these concepts mutually compatible: "empirical combination", "hybridization", and "theoretical and ontological reconciliation". In analytical terms, none of these versions is fully successful. The empirical argument is that the relevance of habitus began to decline in the late 20th century, in light of major structural changes in advanced capitalist democracies. In these circumstances, habitual forms have proven incapable of providing guidelines for people's lives, thus making reflexivity necessary. The article concludes with the argument that even the reproduction of one's birth history now constitutes a reflexive activity, and that the most favorable mode of its production, which the author refers to as "communicative reflexivity", is becoming increasingly difficult to sustain.

Item Type:	Journal Article
Subjects:	H Social Sciences > HM Sociology
Divisions:	Faculty of Social Sciences > Sociology
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH):	Habit
Journal or Publication Title:	Dados: revista de ciencias sociais
Publisher:	Instituto Universitario de Pesquisas do Rio de Janeiro
ISSN:	0011-5258
Date:	2011
Volume:	Vol.54
Number:	No.1
Page Range:	pp. 157-206
Identification Number:	10.1590/S0011-52582011000100005
Status:	Peer Reviewed
Publication Status:	Published
Description:	Abstract in English, article in Portuguese.
Translated As:	Archer, M. S. (2010). Routine, Reflexivity, and Realism. Sociological Theory, 28(3), pp. 272–303.
Related URLs:	Related item in WRAP
References:	ADAMS, Matthew. (2006), “Hybridizing Habitus and Reflexivity: Towards an Understanding of Contemporary Identity”. Sociology, vol. 40, pp. 511-528. ALEXANDER, Jeffrey. (1982), Theoretical Logic in Sociology (Vol. 1), Positivism, Presuppositions, and Current Controversies. Berkeley, CA, University of California Press. . (1994), Fin de Siècle Social Theory. London, UK, Verso. ARCHER, Margaret S. (1979), Social Origins of Educational Systems. Beverly Hills, CA, Sage. . (1988), Culture and Agency: The Place of Culture in Social Theory. Cambridge, UK, Cambridge University Press. . (1995), Realist Social Theory: The Morphogenetic Approach. Cambridge, UK, Cambridge University Press. . (1998), “Social Theory and the Analysis of Society”, in Knowing the Social World, (editado por T. May e M. Williams). Buckingham, UK, Open University Press, pp. 69-85. . (2000), Being Human: The Problem of Agency. Cambridge, UK, Cambridge University Press. . (2003), Structure, Agency and the Internal Conversation. Cambridge,UK,Cambridge University Press. . (2007), Making Our Way Through the World: Human Reflexivity and Social Mobility. Cambridge, UK, Cambridge University Press. ———. (no prelo), The Reflexive Imperative. BECK, Ulrich e BECK-GERNSHEIM, Elizabeth. (2002), Individualization. London, UK, Sage. BECK, Ulrich, GIDDENS, Anthony e SCOTT, Lash. (1994), Reflexive Modernization: Politics, Tradition and Aesthetics in the Modern Social Order. Oxford, UK, Polity. BHASKAR, Roy. [1979] (1989), The Possibility ofNaturalism.Hemel Hempstead,UK,Harvester Press. BOURDIEU, Pierre. (1972), Esquisse d’une the´orie de la pratique. Geneva, Switzerland, Librarie Droz. . [1980] (1990), The Logic of Practice. Oxford, UK, Polity Press. eWACQUANT, Loïc. (1992), An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology. Oxford,UK, Polity Press. BUCKLEY, Walter. (1967), Sociology and Modern Systems Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ, Prentice Hall. BURGER, Thomas. (1998), “Review of the Creativity of Action”. Contemporary Sociology, vol. 27, no 109. CALHOUN, Craig. (1993), “Habitus, Field and Capital: The Question of Historical Specificity”, in C. Calhoun et alii (eds.), Bourdieu: Critical Perspectives. Oxford,UK, Polity Press, pp. 61-88. CAMIC, Charles. (1986), “TheMatter ofHabit”. American Journal of Sociology, vol. 91, pp. 1039-1087. CAMPBELL, Colin. (1996), The Myth of Social Action. Cambridge, UK, Cambridge University Press. COLAPIETRO, Vincent, M. (1989), Peirce’s Approach to the Self: A Semiotic Perspective on Human Subjectivity. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press. COLLIER, Andrew. (1994), Critical Realism. London, Verso. CROSSLEY, Nick. (2001), The Social Body: Habit, Identity, Desire. London, Sage. DALTON, Benjamin. (2004), “Creativity,Habit, and the Social Products of Creative Action: Revising Joas, Incorporating Bourdieu”. Sociological Theory, vol. 22, pp. 603-622. DAVIS, William H. (1972), Peirce’s Epistemology. The Hague, the Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff. DÉPELTEAU, François. (2008), “Relational Thinking: A Critique of Co-Deterministic Theories of Structure and Agency”. Sociological Theory, vol. 26, pp. 51-69. DONATI, Pierpaolo. (1985), Introduzione alla Sociologica Relazionale.Milan, Franco Angeli. . (2008), “La Teoria del Realismo Critico e` una Ragione Sociologica anche fa Esperienza della re-alita`”, in A.Maccarini, E. Morandi e R. Prandini (eds.), Realismo Sociologico. Genova/Milan, Marietti, pp. 163-181. . (2009), Teoria Relazionale della Societa`. Milan, FrancoAngeli. . (2011), “Doing Sociology in the Age of Globalization”, in Relational Sociology: A New Perspective for the Social Sciences. London, Routledge, pp. 211-232. DURKHEIM, Emile. [1898-1900] (1958), Professional Ethics and Civic Morals. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
URI:	http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/38592