Determining non-invasiveness in ornamental plants to build green lists
Dehnen-Schmutz, Katharina. (2011) Determining non-invasiveness in ornamental plants to build green lists. Journal of Applied Ecology, Vol.48 (No.6). pp. 1374-1380. ISSN 0021-8901Full text not available from this repository.
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2011.02061.x
Ornamental horticulture is the most important pathway for plant invasions world-wide. Large numbers of non-native plants are used as ornamentals, and current policies fail to effectively address the continued escape of species from cultivation. Legislative measures are often limited to the listing of few high-risk species banned from sale or planting. This approach, however, may give the impression that non-listed species are not considered to be a risk and are therefore safe to use. The continued widespread use of species not yet identified as having the risk to become invasive may create a problem in the future. 2. This article argues that knowledge gained from studies designed to identify invasive traits of species and factors contributing to their invasion success can also be used to identify species with a low invasion risk that can be recommended to the horticultural trade, landscaping sector and gardeners for safer use. 3. The criteria identified for non-invading species to be listed in a green list include sufficiently long residence time, high propagule pressure, no records of invasive occurrences elsewhere and an indication of some robustness to climate change. An example is provided for a random sample of ornamental species used in Britain. 4. Synthesis and application. There is a pressing need to prevent further plant invasions resulting from ornamental horticulture. A green list of non-native ornamental species that have been assessed as having a low risk of escaping cultivation will contribute to the prevention of plant invasions. Species not yet assessed which may have the potential to become invasive in the future can then be more easily avoided. This list would be particularly useful in large-scale plantings and landscaping projects. Currently, policies often focus on (i) species that are already introduced and recognized as invasive and (ii) the prevention of potential further invasions from new introductions. This study suggests that attention to non-invasive species already present in the country and widely used in horticulture can help to advance policies for dealing with invasive ornamental species.
|Item Type:||Journal Article|
|Subjects:||Q Science > QH Natural history > QH301 Biology
S Agriculture > SB Plant culture
|Divisions:||Faculty of Science > Life Sciences (2010- )|
|Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH):||Plants, Ornamental, Alien plants, Introduced organisms, Invasive plants -- Risk assessment, Invasive plants -- Control, Applied ecology|
|Journal or Publication Title:||Journal of Applied Ecology|
|Publisher:||Blackwell Science Ltd.|
|Page Range:||pp. 1374-1380|
|Access rights to Published version:||Restricted or Subscription Access|
|References:||Baskin, Y. (2002) The greening of horticulture: new codes of conduct aim to curb plant invasions. BioScience, 52, 464–471. Brickell, C. (1996) The Royal Horticultural Society A-Z Encyclopaedia of Garden Plants.Dorling Kindersley, London. Bucharova, A. & van Kleunen, M. (2009) Introduction history and species characteristics partly explain naturalization success of North American woody species in Europe. Journal of Ecology, 97, 230–238. Burt, J.W., Muir, A.A., Piovia-Scott, J., Veblen, K.E., Chang,A.L., Grossman, J.D. &Weiskel, H.W. (2007) Preventing horticultural introductions of invasive plants: potential efficacy of voluntary initiatives. Biological Invasions, 9, 909–923. Campbell-Culver, M. (2001) The Origin of Plants. The People and Plants That Have Shaped Britain¢s Garden History Since the Year 1000. Headline, London. Cox, K. (2010) Evaluating plant hardiness. The Plantsman, 9, 114–117. Daehler, C.C. (2009) Short lag times for invasive tropical plants: evidence from experimental plantings in Hawai’i. PLoSONE, 4, e4462. Dehnen-Schmutz, K. & Touza, J. (2008) Plant invasions and ornamental horticulture: pathway, propagule pressure and the legal framework. Floriculture, Ornamental and Plant Biotechnology Volume V (ed. J.A. Teixeira da Silva), pp. 15–21. Global Science Books, Isleworth,UK. Dehnen-Schmutz, K., Touza, J., Perrings, C. &Williamson, M. (2007a) A century of the ornamental plant trade and its impact on invasion success. Diversity andDistributions, 13, 527–534. Dehnen-Schmutz, K., Touza, J., Perrings, C. & Williamson, M. (2007b) The horticultural trade and ornamental plant invasions in Britain. Conservation Biology, 21, 224–231. Drew, J., Anderson, N. & Andow, D. (2010) Conundrums of a complex vector for invasive species control: a detailed examination of the horticultural industry. Biological Invasions, 12, 2837–2851. Ellstrand, N.C. & Schierenbeck, K.A. (2000) Hybridization as stimulus for the evolution of invasiveness in plants? PNAS, 97, 7043–7050. Gasso´ , N., Basnou, C. & Vila´ ,M. (2010) Predicting plant invaders in the Mediterranean through a weed risk assessment system. Biological Invasions, 12, 463–476. Genovesi, P. & Shine, C. (2004) European Strategy on Invasive Alien Species. Council of Europe, Strasbourg. Hanspach, J.,Ku¨ hn, I., Pysˇek, P., Boos, E. &Klotz, S. (2008) Correlates of naturalization and occupancy of introduced ornamentals in Germany. Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics, 10, 241–250. Herron, P.M., Martine, C.T., Latimer, A.M. & Leicht-Young, S.A. (2007) Invasive plants and their ecological strategies: prediction and explanation of woody plant invasion in New England. Diversity and Distributions, 13, 633– 644. Hill, M., Baker, R., Broad, G., Chandler, P.J., Copp, G.H., Ellis, J., Jones, D., Hoyland, C., Laing, I., Longshaw, M., Moore, N., Parrott, D., Pearman, D., Preston, C., Smith, R.M. & Waters, R. (2005) Audit of Non-Native Species in England. English Nature, Peterborough. Hulme, P.E., Bacher, S., Kenis, M., Klotz, S., Ku¨ hn, I.,Minchin, D., Nentwig, W., Olenin, S., Panov, V., Pergl, J., Pysˇek, P., Roques, A., Sol, D., Solarz, W. & Vila, M. (2008) Grasping at the routes of biological invasions: a framework for integrating pathways into policy. Journal of Applied Ecology, 45, 403–414. Keith, M. & Van Jaarsveld, A.S. (2002) Revisiting green data species lists. Biodiversity and Conservation, 11, 1313–1316. Kowarik, I. (1995) Time lags in biological invasions with regard to the success and failure of alien species. Plant Invasions – General Aspects and Special Problems (eds P. Pysˇek, K. Prach, M. Rejma´nek & M. Wade), pp. 15–38. SPB Academic Publishing,Amsterdam. Krˇiva´nek, M. & Pysˇek, P. (2006) Predicting invasions by woody species in a temperate zone: a test of three risk assessment schemes in the Czech Republic (Central Europe). Diversity andDistributions, 12, 319–327. Krˇiva´nek, M., Pysˇek, P. & Jarosˇik, V. (2006) Planting history and propagule pressure as predictors of invasion by woody species in a temperate region. Conservation Biology, 20, 1487–1498. Lockwood, J.L., Cassey, P. & Blackburn, T. (2005) The role of propagule pressure in explaining species invasions. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 20, 223– 228. Lord, T. (2003) Flora. The Gardener’s Bible. pp. 1584. Cassell, London. Mack,R.N. (2003) Global plant dispersal, naturalization, and invasion: pathways, modes, and circumstances. Invasive Species: Vectors and Management Strategies (eds G.M.Ruiz&J.T.Carlton), pp. 3–30. Island Press,Washington. Mack, R.N. & Erneberg, M. (2002) The United States naturalized flora: largely the product of deliberate introductions. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden, 89, 176–189. Mack, R.N. & Lonsdale,W.M. (2001) Humans as global plant dispersers: getting more than we bargained for. BioScience, 51, 95–102. Moss, W.&Walmsley, R. (2005) Controlling the Sale of Invasive Garden Plants: Why VoluntaryMeasures Alone Fail. pp. 14.WWF-Australia, Sydney. Mulvaney, M. (2001) The effect of introduction pressure on the naturalization of ornamental woody plants in south-eastern Australia. Weed Risk Assessment (eds R.H. Groves, F.D. Panetta & J.G. Virtue), pp. 186–193. CSIRO Publishing, Collingwood. Pemberton, R.W. & Liu, H. (2009) Marketing time predicts naturalization of horticultural plants. Ecology, 90, 69–80. Preston, C.D., Pearman, D.A. & Dines, T.D. (2002) New Atlas of the British and Irish Flora. OxfordUniversity Press,Oxford. Pysˇek, P. & Jarosˇı´k, V. (2005) Residence time determines the distribution of alien plants. Invasive Plants: Ecological and Agricultural Aspects (ed. ????. Inderjit), pp. 77–96. Birkha¨ user, Basel. Pysˇek, P. & Richardson, D.M. (2007) Traits associated with invasiveness in alien plants: where do we stand? Biological Invasions (ed. W. Nentwig), pp. 97–125. Springer, Berlin. Reichard, S. & Hamilton, C.W. (1997) Predicting invasions of woody plants introduced into North America. Conservation Biology, 11, 193–203. Rejma´nek,M., Richardson, D.M., Higgins, S.I., Pitcairn, M.J.& Grotkopp, E. (2005) Ecology of invasive plants: state of the art. Invasive Alien Species: A New Synthesis (eds H.A. Mooney, R.N. Mack, J.A. McNeely, L.E. Neville, P.J. Schei& J.K.Waage), pp. 104–161. Island Press,Washington. Richardson, D.M. & Pysˇek, P. (2006) Plant invasions: merging the concepts of species invasiveness and community invasibility. Progress in Physical Geography, 30, 409–431. Richardson, D.M., Pysˇek, P., Rejmanek,M., Barbour,M.G., Panetta, F.D. & West, C.J. (2000) Naturalization and invasion of alien plants: concepts and definitions. Diversity and Distributions, 6, 93–107. Royal Horticultural Society (2010) Plant Finder 2010–2011. Dorling Kindersley, London. Ruesink, J.L., Parker, I.M., Groom, M.J. & Kareiva, P.M. (1995) Reducing the risks of nonindigenous species introductions. BioScience, 45, 465–477. Sakai, A.K., Allendorf, F.W., Holt, J.S., Lodge, D.M., Molofsky, J., With, K.A., Baughman, S., Cabin, R.J., Cohen, J.E., Ellstrand, N.C., McCauley, D.E., O’Neil, P., Parker, I.M., Thompson, J.N. & Weller, S.G. (2001) The population biology of invasive species. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 32, 305–332. Simberloff, D. (2006) Risk assessments, blacklists, and white lists for introduced species: are predictions good enough to be useful? Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, 35, 1–10. Simberloff, D. (2009) The role of propagule pressure in biological invasions. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 40, 81–102. The Plant List (2010) Version 1. Published on the Internet; http://www.the plantlist.org/. Accessed February 2011. Verloove, F. (2006) Catalogue of neophytes in Belgium (1800–2005). Scripta Botanica Belgica, 39, 1–89. Walters, S.M., Brady, A., Brickell, C.D., Cullen, J., Green, P.S., Lewis, J., Matthews, V.A., Webb, D.A., Yeo, P.F. & Alexander, J.C.M. (1986-2000) European Garden Flora. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. Walther, G.-R., Gritti, E.S., Berger, S., Hickler, T., Tang, Z. & Sykes, M.T. (2007) Palms tracking climate change. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 16, 801–809. Walther, G.-R., Roques, A., Hulme, P.E., Sykes, M.T., Pysˇek, P., Ku¨hn, I., Zobel, M., Bacher, S., Botta-Dukat, Z., Bugmann, H., Czucz, B., Dauber, J., Hickler, T., Jarosˇik, V., Kenis, M., Klotz, S., Minchin, D., Moora, M., Nentwig, W., Ott, J., Panov, V., Reineking, B., Robinet, C., Semenchenko, V., Solarz,W., Thuiller, W., Vila, M., Vohland, K. & Settele, J. (2009) Alien species in a warmer world: risks and opportunities. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 24, 686–693. Williamson, M. (1996) Biological Invasions. Chapman&Hall, London. Williamson, M. (1999) Invasions. Ecography, 22, 5–12. Williamson, M., Dehnen-Schmutz, K., Ku¨ hn, I., Hill, M., Klotz, S., Milbau, A., Stout, J. & Pysˇek, P. (2009) The distribution of range sizes of native and alien plants in four European countries and the effects of residence time. Diversity andDistributions, 15, 158–166. Wilson, J.R.U., Richardson, D.M., Rouget, M., Proches, S.,Amis,M.A., Henderson, L. & Thuiller,W. (2007) Residence time and potential range: crucial considerations in modelling plant invasions. Diversity and Distributions, 13, 11–22.|
Actions (login required)