Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Statistics
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login

Letter to the editor : prioritisation of infectious diseases in public health : feedback on the prioritisation methodology, 15 July 2008 to 15 January 2009

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Vilas, V. J. D., Montibeller, Gilberto and Franco, A. (Alberto) (2011) Letter to the editor : prioritisation of infectious diseases in public health : feedback on the prioritisation methodology, 15 July 2008 to 15 January 2009. Eurosurveillance, Vol.16 (No.27). pp. 24-25. ISSN 1560-7917

Full text not available from this repository.
Official URL: http://www.eurosurveillance.org/Default.aspx

Abstract

To the editor: We read with great interest the results presented by Gilsdorf and Krause (2011) [1] of a survey to experts on the methodology used by Krause et al. (2008) [2] to prioritise 85 pathogens of public health importance. Their work deals with a very relevant subject, given current pressure on health budgets: the allocation of finite disease surveillance and control resources among competing alternatives, infectious diseases in this case. The authors correctly identify the evaluation as being multi-dimensional and compensatory. Unfortunately, they appear to have overlooked findings and principles of well-established methodologies for assessing the impact of multiple effects on non-tradable goods, such as multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) [5]. It is within this perspective that we make our comments. [...]

Item Type: Journal Item
Subjects: R Medicine > RA Public aspects of medicine
Divisions: Faculty of Social Sciences > Warwick Business School
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): Communicable diseases, Public health surveillance
Journal or Publication Title: Eurosurveillance
Publisher: Centre European pour la Surveillance Epidemiologique du SIDA
ISSN: 1560-7917
Date: 7 July 2011
Volume: Vol.16
Number: No.27
Page Range: pp. 24-25
Status: Peer Reviewed
Publication Status: Published
References: 1. Gilsdorf A, Krause G. Prioritisation of infectious diseases in public health: feedback on the prioritisation methodology, 15 July 2008 to 15 January 2009. Euro Surveill. 2011; 16(18):pii=19861. Available from: http://www.eurosurveillance.org/ViewArticle.aspx?ArticleId=19861 2. Krause G; Working group on prioritisation at the Robert Koch Institute. Prioritisation of infectious disease in public health – call for comments. Euro Surveill. 2008; 13(40):pii=18996. Available from: http://www.eurosurveillance.org/ViewArticle.aspx?ArticleId=18996 3. Montibeller G, Franco LA, Del Rio Vilas VJ. Prioritising emerging threats with multi-criteria decision analysis. Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Multi-Criteria Decision Making; 2011 Jun 13-17, Jyvaskyla, Finland. Forthcoming. 4. Keeney RL. Common mistakes in making value trade-offs. Operations Research 2002;50(6):935-45. 5. Keeney RL, Raiffa H. Decisions with multiple objectives: preferences and value tradeoffs, 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1993.
URI: http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/38764

Data sourced from Thomson Reuters' Web of Knowledge

Request changes to a record

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item
twitter

Email us: publications@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us