Ballinger, T. P.,Wilcox, N. (1997). Decisions, error and heterogeneity. Economic Journal, 107, 1090–1105.
Barnett, A. G., van der Pols, J. C., & Dobson, A. J. (2005). Regression to the mean: What it is and
how to deal with it. International Journal of Epidemiology, 34, 215–220.
Becker, G. M., DeGroot, M. H., & Marschak, J. (1963). Stochastic models of choice behavior. Behavioral
Science, 8, 41–55.
Blavatskyy, P. R. (2006). Violations of betweenness or random errors?. Economics Letters, 91, 34–38.
Blavatskyy, P. R. (2007). Stochastic expected utility theory. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 34, 259–286.
Block, H. D., & Marschak, J., et al. (1960). Random orderings and stochastic theories of response. In
I. Olkin (Ed.), Contributions to probability and statistics (pp. 97–132). Stanford: Stanford University
Press.
Butler, D. J. (2000). Do non-expected utility choice patterns spring from hazy preferences?
An experimental study of choice ‘errors’. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization,
41, 277–297.
Butler, D., & Loomes, G. (2007). Imprecision as an account of the preference reversal phenomenon.
American Economic Review, 97, 277–297.
Brañas-Garza, P., Georgantzís, N., & Guillén, P. (2007). Direct and indirect effects of pathological
gambling on risk attitudes. Judgment and Decision Making, 2, 126–136.
Brañas-Garza, P., Guillén, P., & López del Paso, R. (2008). Math skills and risk attitudes. Economics
Letters, 99, 332–336.
Camacho-Cuena, E., Garcia-Gallego, A., Georgantzis, N., & Sabater-Grande, G. (2003). An experimental
test of response consistency in contingent valuation. Ecological Economics, 47, 167–182.
Camacho-Cuena, E., Garcia-Gallego, A., Georgantzis, N., & Sabater-Grande, G. (2004). An experimental
validation of hypothetical WTP for a recyclable product. Environmental and Resource
Economics, 27, 313–335.
Camerer, C. F. (1989). An experimental test of several generalized utility theories. Journal of Risk and
Uncertainty, 2, 61–104.
Camerer, C. F. (1995). Individual decision making. In A. E. Roth & J. H. Kagel (Eds.), The handbook
of experimental economics (pp. 587–703). Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Chesher, A. (1997). Non-Normal variation and regression to the mean. Statistical Methods in Medical
Research, 6, 147–166.
Cubitt, R. P., Starmer, C., & Sugden, R. (1998). On the validity of the random lottery incentive
system. Experimental Economics, 1, 115–131.
Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (2000). Forecasting profitability and earnings. The Journal of Business,
73, 161–175.
Friedman, M. (1992). Do old fallacies ever die?. Journal of Economic Literature, 30, 2129–2132.
Galton, F. (1886). Regression towards mediocrity in hereditary stature. Journal of the Anthropological
Institute, 15, 246–263.
Harless, D. W., & Camerer, C. F. (1994). The predictive utility of generalized expected utility
theories. Econometrica, 62, 1251–1289.
Hey, J. D., & Orme, C. (1994). Investigating generalizations of expected utility theory using experimental
data. Econometrica, 62, 1291–1326.
Holt, C. A. (1986). Preference reversals and the independence axiom. American Economic Review, 76,
508–515.
Hotelling, H. (1933). Review of the triumph of mediocrity in business, by Horace Secrist. Journal of
the American Statistical Association, 28, 463–465.
Kahneman, D. (2003). Autobiography. In T. Frängsmyr (Ed.), Les Prix Nobel. The Nobel Prizes 2002.
Stockholm: Nobel Foundation.
Lin, H., & Hughes, M. (1997). Adjusting for regression toward the mean when variables are normally
distributed. Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 6, 129–146.
Loomes, G. (2005). Modelling the stochastic component of behaviour in experiments: Some issues for
the interpretation of data. Experimental Economics, 8, 301–323.
Loomes, G., Moffatt, P., & Sugden, R. (2002). A microeconometric test of alternative stochastic theories
of risky choice. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 24, 103–130.
Loomes, G., & Sugden, R. (1995). Incorporating a stochastic element into decision theories. European
Economic Review, 39, 641–673.
Loomes, G., & Sugden, R. (1998). Testing different stochastic specifications of risky choice. Economica,
65, 581–598.
Luce, R. D. (1958). A probabilistic theory of utility. Econometrica, 26, 193–224.
Luce, R. D. (1959). Individual choice behavior. New York: Wiley.
Müller, H. G., Abramson, I., & Azari, R. (2003). Nonparametric regression to the mean. Proceedings
of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 100, 9715–9720.
Quandt, R. E. (1956). A probabilistic theory of consumer behavior. Quarterly Journal of Economics,
70, 507–536.
Sabater-Grande, G., & Georgantzís, N. (2002). Accounting for risk aversion in repeated prisoners’
dilemma games: An experimental test. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 48, 37–50.
Schmidt, U., & Hey, J. D. (2004). Are preference reversals errors? An experimental investigation. Journal
of Risk and Uncertainty, 29, 207–218.
Schmidt, U., & Neugebauer, T. (2007). Testing expected utility in the presence of errors. Economic
Journal, 517, 470–485.
Schläpfer, F., Roschewitz, A., & Hanley, N. (2004). Validation of stated preferences for public
goods: a comparison of contingent valuation survey response and voting behaviour. Ecological
Economics, 51, 1–16.
Starmer, C. (2000). Developments in non-expected utility theory: The hunt for a descriptive theory of
choice under risk. Journal of Economic Literature, 38, 332–382.
Starmer, C., & Sugden, R. (1989). Violations of the independence axiom in common ratio problems:
An experimental test of some competing hypotheses. Annals of Operations Research, 19, 79–102.
Starmer, C., & Sugden, R. (1991). Does the random-lottery incentive system elicit true preferences?
An experimental investigation. American Economic Review, 81, 971–978.
Stigler, S. M. (1997). Regression towards the mean, historically considered. Statistical Methods
in Medical Research, 6, 103–114.
Yudkin, P. L., & Stratton, I. M. (1996). How to deal with regression to the mean in intervention
studies. Lancet, 347, 241–243.