MacCallum, Fiona and Golombok, Susan. (2007) Embryo donation families : mothers' decisions regarding disclosure of donor conception. Human Reproduction, Vol.22 (No.11). pp. 2888-2895. ISSN 0268-1161

Preview

PDF WRAP_MacCallum_ED_telling__paperrev2.pdf - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader Download (160Kb)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Previous data suggest that parents who adopt a child tend to support full disclosure while donor conception families prefer to keep the method of conception relatively private. It is not known whether parents in embryo donation families will tend towards the adoption model, therefore, we studied families with a child conceived using donated embryos. METHODS: A total of 21 embryo donation families with a child aged 2–5 years were recruited through UK fertility clinics. Mothers were administered a standardized semi-structured interview, obtaining data on the extent of their disclosure to children and other family members and their reasons for this decision. RESULTS: At the time of interview, 9% of mothers had told their child how they had conceived; 24% of mothers reported that they were planning to tell the child in future; 43% had decided that they would never tell the child, and the remaining 24% were undecided. However, nearly three-quarter of mothers (72%) had disclosed to other family members. Maternal grandparents were more likely to have been told than paternal grandparents (P < 0.025). Reasons cited for non-disclosure to the child included the desire to protect the child, the belief that disclosure is unnecessary, and the concern that family relationships would be damaged. Reasons in favour of disclosure included the desire to avoid accidental disclosure and the belief that the child has the right to know. CONCLUSIONS: Embryo donation mothers were similar to parents of donor insemination and oocyte donation children in their attitudes towards disclosure of donor conception.

Item Type:	Journal Article
Subjects:	B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology
Divisions:	Faculty of Science > Psychology
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH):	Mother and child, Artificial insemination, human, Human reproduction, Human reproductive technology
Journal or Publication Title:	Human Reproduction
Publisher:	Oxford University Press
ISSN:	0268-1161
Date:	3 September 2007
Volume:	Vol.22
Number:	No.11
Page Range:	pp. 2888-2895
Identification Number:	10.1093/humrep/dem272
Status:	Peer Reviewed
Access rights to Published version:	Open Access
References:	Baran A and Pannor R (1993) Lethal Secrets. Amistad, New York. Blyth E (2002) Information on genetic origins in donor-assisted conception: Is knowing who you are a human rights issue? Hum Fertil 5, 185-92. Brewaeys A (2001) Review: Parent-child relationships and child development in donor insemination families. Hum Reprod Update 7, 38-46. Brewaeys A, Golombok S, Naaktgeboren N, de Bruyn JK and van Hall EV (1997) Donor insemination: Dutch parents' opinions about confidentiality and donor anonymity and the emotional adjustment of their children. Hum Reprod 12, 1591-1597. Brodzinsky D and Pinderhughes E (2002) Parenting and child development in adoptive families. In Bornstein M (ed.), Handbook of Parenting, vol 1. Mahwah, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 279-311. Brodzinsky D, Smith DW and Brodzinsky AB (1998) Children's adjustment to adoption. Developmental and clinical issues. Sage Publications, London Burrell R (2005) Assisted Reproduction in the Nordic Countries. Nordic Committee on Bioethics. Retrieved June 10, 2007 from http://www.ncbio.org Clamar A (1989) Psychological implications of the anonymous pregnancy. In Offerman-Zuckerberg J (ed.), Gender in transition: a new frontier. New York and London, Plenum medical book company, pp.111-112. Cook R, Golombok S, Bish A and Murray C (1995) Disclosure of donor insemination: Parental attitudes. Am J Orthopsychiatry 65, 549-559. Daniels K and Taylor K (1993) Secrecy and openness in donor insemination. Politics Life Sci 12, 155-170. Daniels KR (1995) Information sharing in donor insemination: A conflict of rights and needs. Cam Q of Healthc Ethic 4, 217-224. Donor Conception Network (2006). Telling and Talking. from www.dcnetwork.org Erikson EH (1968) Identity: Youth and Crisis. Norton, New York Gibbs GR (2002) Qualitative Data Analysis: Explorations with NVIVO. McGraw-Hill Education, Maidenhead, UK Gollancz D (2001) Donor insemination: A question of rights. Hum Fertil 4, 164-167. Golombok S, Brewaeys A, Giavazzi M, Guerra D, MacCallum F and Rust J (2002) The European study of assisted reproduction families: The transition to adolescence. Hum Reprod 17, 830-840. Golombok S, Lycett E, MacCallum F, Jadva V, Murray C, Abdalla H, Jenkins J, Margara R and Rust J (2004) Parenting children conceived by gamete donation. J Fam Psychol 18, 443-452. Greenfeld DA, Greenfeld DG, Mazure CM, Keefe DL and Olive DL (1998) Do attitudes towards disclosure in donor oocyte recipients predict the use of anonymous versus directed donation? Fertil Steril 70, 1009-1014. HFEA (2007) For parents of donor-conceived children. www.hfea.gov.uk/en/1185.html Howe D and Feast J (2000) Adoption, search and reunion: The long term experiences of adopted adults. The Children's Society, London Klock SC, and Greenfeld DA (2004) Parents' knowledge about the donors and their attitudes toward disclosure in oocyte donation. Hum Reprod 19, 1575-1579. Lindblad F, Gottlieb C and Lalos O (2000) To tell or not to tell - what parents think about telling their children that they were born following donor insemination. J Psychosom Obstet Gynecol 21, 193-203. Lycett E, Daniels K, Curson R and Golombok S (2004) Offspring created as a result of donor insemination: A study of family relationships, child adjustment, and disclosure. Fertil Steril 82, 172-179. Lycett E, Daniels KR, Curson R and Golombok S (2005) School-aged children of donor insemination: A study of parents' disclosure patterns. Hum Reprod 20, 810-819. MacCallum F, Golombok S and Brinsden P (2007) Parenting and child development in families with a child conceived through embryo donation. J Fam Psychol, in press. Mahlstedt P and Greenfeld D (1989) Assisted reproductive technology with donor gametes: the need for patient preparation. Fertil Steril 52, 908-914. McGee G, Brakman S and Gurmankin AD (2001) Disclosure to children conceived with donor gametes should not be optional. Hum Reprod 6, 2033-2036. McWhinnie A (2001) Should offspring from donated gametes continue to be denied knowledge of their origins and antecedents? Hum Reprod 16, 807-817. Murray C and Golombok S (2003) To tell or not to tell: The decision-making process of egg donation parents. Hum Fertil 6, 89-95. Murray C, MacCallum F and Golombok S (2006) Egg donation parents and their children: follow-up at age 12 years. Fertil Steril 85, 610-618 Nachtigall RD, Pitcher L, Tschann JM, Becker G and Szkupinski Quiroga S (1997) Stigma, disclosure and family functioning among parents of children concieved through donor insemination. Fertil Steril 68, 83-89. Papp P (1993) The worm in the bud: Secrets between parents and children. In Imber-Black E (ed.), Secrets in families and family therapy. Norton, New York, pp 66-85. Patrizio P, Mastroianni AC and Mastroianni L (2001) Disclosure to children conceived with donor gametes should be optional. Hum Reprod 16, 2033-2036. Pennings G (1997) The double track policy for donor anonymity. Hum Reprod 12, 2839-2844. Rumball A and Adair V (1999) Telling the story: Parents' scripts for donor offspring. Hum Reprod 14, 1392-1399. Scheib J, Riordan M and Rubin S (2003) Choosing identity-release sperm donors: The parents' perspective 13-18 years later. Hum Reprod 18, 1115-1127. Shenfield F and Steele SJ (1997) What are the effects of anonymity and secrecy on the welfare of the child in gamete donation? Hum Reprod 12, 392-395. Snowden R and Mitchell GD (1981) The Artificial Family. George Allen & Unwin, London Snowden R, Mitchell GD and Snowden EM (1983) Artificial Reproduction: A social investigation. George Allen & Unwin, London Soderstrom-Antilla V, Foudila T, Ripatti U and Siegberg R (2001) Embryo donation: outcome and attitudes among embryo donors and recipients. Hum Reprod 16, 1120-1128. Triseliotis J (1973) In Search of Origins: The experiences of adopted people. Routledge & Kegan Paul, London Trounson A, Leeton J, Besanka M, Wood C and Conti A (1983) Pregnancy established in an infertile patient after transfer of a donated embryo fertilized in vitro. Br Med J 286, 835-838. Turner AJ and Coyle A (2000) What does it mean to be a donor offspring? The identity experiences of adults conceived by donor insemination and the implications for counselling and therapy. Hum Reprod 15, 2041-2051. Walker I and Broderick P (1999) The psychology of assisted reproduction - or psychology assisting its reproduction. Aust Psychol 34, 38-44.
URI:	http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/388

Data sourced from Thomson Reuters' Web of Knowledge

Request changes to a record

Actions (login required)

View Item