| References: | Allison, G.T. (1971). Essence of decision. Boston, MA: Little, Brown.
Ashby, R. (1956). An introduction to cybernetics. London, UK: Methuen.
Beer, S. (1966). Decision and Control. Chichester, UK: John Wiley.
Boisot, M., & McKelvey, B. (2010). Integrating modernist and postmodernist perspectives on organizations: A complexity science perspective. Academy of Management Review, 35, 415–433.
Casti, J. (1994). Explaining a paradoxical world through the science of surprise. London, UK: Abacus.
Chia, R. (1994). The concept of decision: A deconstructive practice. Journal of Management Studies, 31,781–806.
Chia, R. (1999). A ‘rhizomic’ model of organizational change and transformation: Perspective from a metaphysics of change. British Journal of Management, 10, 209–227.
Child, J., & Rodrigues, S.B. (2011). How organizations engage with external complexity: A political action perspective. Organization Studies, 32, 000–000.
Cilliers, P. (1998). Complexity and postmodernism. London, UK: Routledge.
Cooper, R. (1987). Information, communication and organization: A post-structural revision. Journal of Mind and Behavior, 8, 395–416.
Coutu, D.L. (2003). Sense and reliability: A conversation with celebrated psychologist Karl E. Weick. Harvard Business Review, April, 84–90.
Dillon, M. (2000). Poststructuralism, complexity and poetics. Theory, Culture & Society, 17, 1–26.
Dooley, K.J., & Van de Ven, A.H. (1999). Explaining complex organizational dynamics. Organization Science, 10, 358–372.
Farjoun, M., & Levin, M. (2011). A fractal approach to industry dynamism. Organization Studies, 32, 000–000.
Feldman, M. (2000). Organizational routines as a source of continuous change. Organization Science, 11, 611–629.
Garud, R., Gehman, J., & Kumaraswamy, A. (2011). Complexity arrangements for sustained innovation: Lessons from 3M Corporation. Organization Studies, 32, 000–000.
Hayles, K.N. (Ed.) (1991). Chaos and order. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
Hayles, K.N. (1999). How we became posthuman. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Hirschman, A.O. (1984). Against parsimony: Three easy ways of complicating some categories of economic discourse. American Economic Review, 74, 89–96.
Holland, J. (1999). Emergence. New York, NY: Basic Books.
Kauffman, S.A. (2008). Reinventing the sacred. New York, NY: Basic Books.
Lorino, P., Tricard, B., & Clot, Y. (2011). Research methods for non-representational approaches to organizational complexity: The dialogical mediated inquiry. Organization Studies, 32, 000–000.
March, J.G. (1988). Decisions and organizations. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
March, J.G. (1999). The pursuit of organizational intelligence. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
March, J.G. (2008). Explorations in organizations. Stanford, CA: Stanford Business Books.
Morin, E. (2005). Restricted complexity, general complexity. Paper presented at the Colloquium ‘Intelligence de la complexite: epistemologie et pragmatique’, Cerisy-La-Salle, France, June.
Morin, E. (2008). On complexity. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
Orlikowski, W. (2007). Sociomaterial practices: Exploring technology at work. Organization Studies, 28, 1435–1448.
Polanyi, M. (1962). Personal knowledge. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
Prigogine, I. (1997). The end of certainty. New York, NY: Free Press.
Thompson, E. (2007). Mind in life. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.
Toulmin, S. (1990). Cosmopolis, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Tsoukas, H. (2005). Complex knowledge. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Tsoukas, H., & Chia, R. (2002). On organizational becoming: Rethinking organizational change. Organization Science, 13, 567–582.
Tsoukas, H., & Hatch, M.J. (2001). Complex thinking, complex practice: The case for a narrative approach to organizational complexity. Human Relations, 54, 979–1014.
Turner, F. (1995). The culture of hope. New York, NY: Free Press.
Varela, F.J., Thompson, E., & Rosch, E. (1991). The embodied mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Von Foerster, H. (2010). Understanding understanding. Berlin, Germany: Springer.
Weick, K.E. (1979). The social psychology of organizing. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
Weick, K.E. (2001). The attitude of wisdom: Ambivalence as the optimal compromise. In Making sense of the organization (pp. 361–379). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
Weick, K.E. (2007). The generative properties of richness. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 14–19.
Weick, K.E., & Roberts, K. (1993). Collective mind in organizations: Heedful interrelating on flight decks. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38, 357–381. |
|---|
