Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Statistics
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login

Mutual information between geomagnetic indices and the solar wind as seen by WIND : implications for propagation time estimates

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

March, T. K., Chapman, Sandra C. and Dendy, R. O.. (2005) Mutual information between geomagnetic indices and the solar wind as seen by WIND : implications for propagation time estimates. Geophysical Research Letters, Vol.32 . ISSN 0094-8276

[img]
Preview
PDF
WRAP_March_Mutual_information_geomagnetic.pdf - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader

Download (271Kb)
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2004GL021677

Abstract

The determination of delay times of solar wind conditions at the sunward libration point to effects on Earth is investigated using mutual information. This measures the amount of information shared between two timeseries. We consider the mutual information content of solar wind observations, from WIND, and the geomagnetic indices. The success of five commonly used schemes for estimating interplanetary propagation times is examined. Propagation assuming a fixed plane normal at 45 degrees to the GSE x-axis (i.e. the Parker Spiral estimate) is found to give optimal mutual information. The mutual information depends on the point in space chosen as the target for the propagation estimate, and we find that it is maximized by choosing a point in the nightside rather than dayside magnetosphere. In addition, we employ recurrence plot analysis to visualize contributions to the mutual information, this suggests that it appears on timescales of hours rather than minutes.

Item Type: Journal Article
Subjects: Q Science > QB Astronomy
Divisions: Faculty of Science > Physics
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): Solar wind, Geomagnetic indexes, Magnetospheric radio wave propagation, Magnetosphere
Journal or Publication Title: Geophysical Research Letters
Publisher: American Geophysical Union
ISSN: 0094-8276
Date: 2005
Volume: Vol.32
Identification Number: 10.1029/2004GL021677
Status: Peer Reviewed
Access rights to Published version: Open Access
Funder: Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC), Particle Physics and Astronomy Research Council (Great Britain) (PPARC)
References: Alder, H. L., and E. B. Roessler (1964), Introduction to Probability and Statistics, 3rd ed., chap. 12, pp. 169–179, W. H. Freeman, New York. Blanchard, G. T., and D. Bankston (2002), Improved interplanetary magnetic field propagation timing by correction of the phase front orientation using two spacecraft, J. Geophys. Res., 107(A12), 1446, doi:10.1029/ 2002JA009258. Collier, M. R., J. A. Slavin, R. P. Lepping, A. Szabo, and K. Ogilvie (1998), Timing accuracy for the simple planar propagation of magnetic field structures in the solar wind, Geophys. Res. Lett., 25, 2509– 2512. Crooker, N. U., G. L. Siscoe, C. T. Russell, and E. J. Smith (1982), Factors controlling degree of correlation between ISEE 1 and ISEE 3 interplanetary magnetic field measurements, J. Geophys. Res., 87, 2224–2230. Davis, T. N., and M. Sugiura (1966), Auroral electrojet activity index AE and its universal time variations, J. Geophys. Res., 71, 785– 801. Eckmann, J. P., S. O. Kamphorst, and D. Ruelle (1987), Recurrence plots of dynamical systems, Europhys. Lett., 4, 973– 977. Horbury, T. S., D. Burgess, M. Fra¨nz, and C. J. Owen (2001), Prediction of Earth arrival times of interplanetary southward magnetic field turnings, J. Geophys. Res., 106, 30,001– 30,009. Kelly, T. J., N. U. Crooker, G. L. Siscoe, C. T. Russell, and E. J. Smith (1986), On the use of a sunward libration-point-orbiting spacecraft as an interplanetary magnetic field monitor for magnetospheric studies, J. Geophys. Res., 91, 5629–5636. Lepping, R. P., et al. (1995), The Wind magnetic field investigation, Space Sci. Rev., 71, 207– 229. March, T. K., S. C. Chapman, and R. O. Dendy (2005), Recurrence plot statistics and the effect of embedding, Physica D, 200, 171– 184. Ogilvie, K. W., et al. (1995), SWE, a comprehensive plasma instrument for the Wind spacecraft, Space Sci. Rev., 71, 55–77. Richardson, J. D., F. Dashevskiy, and K. I. Paularena (1998), Solar wind plasma correlations between L1 and Earth, J. Geophys. Res., 103, 14,619– 14,629. Ridley, A. J. (2000), Estimations of the uncertainty in timing the relationship between magnetospheric and solar wind processes, J. Atmos. Sol. Terr. Phys., 62, 757–771. Roulston, M. S. (1999), Estimating the errors on measured entropy and mutual information, Physica D, 125, 285–294. Russell, C. T., G. L. Siscoe, and E. J. Smith (1980), Comparison of ISEE-1 and -3 interplanetary magnetic field observations, Geophys. Res. Lett., 7, 381– 384. Shannon, C. E., and W. Weaver (1949), The Mathematical Theory of Communication, Univ. of Ill. Press, Champaign. Weimer, D. R., D. M. Ober, N. Maynard, M. R. Collier, D. J. McComas, N. F. Ness, C. W. Smith, and J. Watermann (2003), Predicting interplanetary magnetic field (IMF) propagation delay times using the minimum variance technique, J. Geophys. Res., 108(A1), 1026, doi:10.1029/ 2002JA009405.
URI: http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/3885

Request changes to a record

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Document Downloads

More statistics for this item...
twitter

Email us: publications@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us