Local network externalities and market segmentation
Banerji, A. and Dutta, Bhaskar (2005) Local network externalities and market segmentation. Working Paper. Coventry: University of Warwick, Department of Economics. (Warwick economic research papers.
WRAP_Dutta_twerp_725.pdf - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
Official URL: http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/economics/resear...
This paper models interaction between groups of agents by means of a graph where each node represents a group of agents and an arc represents bilateral interaction. It departs from the standard Katz-Shapiro framework by assuming that network benefits are restricted only amongst groups of linked agents. It shows that even if rival firms engage in Bertrand competition, this form of network externalities permits strong market segmentation in which firms divide up the market and earn positive profits. The analysis also shows that some graphs or network structures do not permit such segmentation, while for others, there are easy to interpret conditions under which market segmentation obtains in equilibrium.
|Item Type:||Working or Discussion Paper (Working Paper)|
|Subjects:||H Social Sciences > HB Economic Theory|
|Divisions:||Faculty of Social Sciences > Economics|
|Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH):||Group decision making, Market segmentation, Competition|
|Series Name:||Warwick economic research papers|
|Publisher:||University of Warwick, Department of Economics|
|Place of Publication:||Coventry|
|Number of Pages:||30|
|Status:||Not Peer Reviewed|
|Access rights to Published version:||Open Access|
|References:||Armstrong, M. (2002). Competition in two-sided markets, mimeo., Oxford University. Caillaud, B. and Jullien, B. (2003). Chicken and egg: competition among intermediation service providers. RAND Journal of Economics 34, pp.309-328. Choi, J. (1994). Network externality, compatibility choice, and planned obsolescence. Journal of Industrial Economics 42 , pp.167-182. Dutta, B. and Jackson, M. (ed.).(2003). Networks and groups: models of strategic formation. Germany: Springer-Verlag. Economides, N. (1996). The economics of networks. International Journal of Industrial Organization 14, pp.673-699. Economides, N. and Salop, S. (1992) Competition and integration among complements and network market structure. Journal of Industrial Economics 40, pp.105-123. Ellison, G. and Fudenberg, D. (2000) The neo-Luddite’s lament: excessive upgrades in the software industry. Rand Journal of Economics, 31, pp.253-272. Farrell, J. and Katz, M. (2000). Innovation, rent extraction and integration in systems markets. Journal of Industrial Economics, 48, pp.413-432. Farrell, J. and Saloner, G. (1985) Standardization, compatibility and innovation. Rand Journal of Economics 16 (1985), pp. 70-83. Farrell, J. and Saloner, G. (1986). Installed base and compatibility: innovation, product pre-announcements and predation. American Economic Review 76, pp.940-955. Gandal, N., Kende, M. and Rob, R. (2000). The dynamics of technological adoption in hardware/software systems: The case of compact disk players. Rand Journal of Economics 31, pp.43-62. Jackson, M. and Wolinsky, A. (1996). A strategic model of social and economic networks, Journal of Economic Theory 71, pp.44-74. Jullien, B. (2003). Competing in network industries: divide and conquer, mimeo, University of Toulouse. Katz, M. and Shapiro, C. (1985). Network externality, competition and compatibility. American Economic Review 75, pp.424-440. Katz, M. and Shapiro, C. (1986). Technology adoption in the presence of network externalities. Journal of Political Economy 94, pp.822-841. Matutes, C. and Regibeau, P. (1992). Compatibility and bundling of complementary goods in a duopoly. Journal of Industrial Economics 40, pp.37-53. Saloner, G. and Shepard, A. (1994). Adoption of technologies with network effects: an empirical examination of the adoption of automated teller machines. Rand Journal of Economics 26, pp.479-501. Sundararajan, A. (2004). Local network effects and network structure, mimeo, New York University, http://oz.stern.nyu.edu, November 2004. Tucker, C. (2004). Network effects and the role of influence in technology adoption, mimeo, Stanford University, November 2004. Waldman, M. (1993). A new perspective on planned obsolescence. Quarterly Journal of Economics 108, pp.273-284|
Actions (login required)