Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Statistics
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login

The 'China Model' and the global crisis : from Friedrich List to a Chinese mode of governance?

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Breslin, Shaun. (2011) The 'China Model' and the global crisis : from Friedrich List to a Chinese mode of governance? International Affairs, Vol.87 (No.6). pp. 1323-1343. ISSN 0020-5850

[img] PDF
WRAP_Breslin_9773219-pais-021111-breslin_china_model.pdf - Submitted Version
Restricted to Repository staff only until 2013. - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader

Download (521Kb)
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2346.2011.01039.x

Abstract

The global financial crisis reinvigorated ongoing debates over whether China has its own distinct and separate “model” of political economy and/or development. There is much that connects this Chinese model with previous systems of national political economies; partly in terms of specific policy preferences, but also in terms of shared basic conceptions of the distribution of power in the global order. Like these previous systems, China has come to stand as an example of an alternative to following dominant (neo)liberal models of development. In this respect, what the China model is not and what China does not stand for might be more important than what it actually is and what it stands for. However, the idea of a coherent and unique Chinese model has considerable purchase, and is both informed and feeds into considerations of China’s uniqueness and difference from the norms, ideas and philosophies that dominate in the rest of the world.

Item Type: Journal Article
Subjects: H Social Sciences > HC Economic History and Conditions
J Political Science > JQ Political institutions (Asia, Africa, Australia, Pacific Area, etc.)
Divisions: Faculty of Social Sciences > Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation
Faculty of Social Sciences > Politics and International Studies
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): China -- Politics and government, China -- Economic policy, Economic development -- China, Global Financial Crisis, 2008-2009
Journal or Publication Title: International Affairs
Publisher: Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
ISSN: 0020-5850
Date: 21 November 2011
Volume: Vol.87
Number: No.6
Page Range: pp. 1323-1343
Identification Number: 10.1111/j.1468-2346.2011.01039.x
Status: Peer Reviewed
Publication Status: Published
Access rights to Published version: Restricted or Subscription Access
Funder: Seventh Framework Programme (European Commission) (FP7/2007-2013)
Grant number: 266809 (FP7)
URI: http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/39070

Request changes to a record

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Document Downloads

More statistics for this item...
twitter

Email us: publications@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us