Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login
  • Admin

The 'China Model' and the global crisis : from Friedrich List to a Chinese mode of governance?

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Breslin, Shaun (2011) The 'China Model' and the global crisis : from Friedrich List to a Chinese mode of governance? International Affairs, Vol.87 (No.6). pp. 1323-1343. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2346.2011.01039.x

[img]
Preview
PDF
WRAP_Breslin_9773219-pais-021111-breslin_china_model.pdf - Submitted Version - Requires a PDF viewer.

Download (521Kb)
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2346.2011.01039.x

Request Changes to record.

Abstract

The global financial crisis reinvigorated ongoing debates over whether China has its own distinct and separate “model” of political economy and/or development. There is much that connects this Chinese model with previous systems of national political economies; partly in terms of specific policy preferences, but also in terms of shared basic conceptions of the distribution of power in the global order. Like these previous systems, China has come to stand as an example of an alternative to following dominant (neo)liberal models of development. In this respect, what the China model is not and what China does not stand for might be more important than what it actually is and what it stands for. However, the idea of a coherent and unique Chinese model has considerable purchase, and is both informed and feeds into considerations of China’s uniqueness and difference from the norms, ideas and philosophies that dominate in the rest of the world.

Item Type: Journal Article
Subjects: H Social Sciences > HC Economic History and Conditions
J Political Science > JQ Political institutions (Asia, Africa, Australia, Pacific Area, etc.)
Divisions: Faculty of Social Sciences > Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation
Faculty of Social Sciences > Politics and International Studies
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): China -- Politics and government, China -- Economic policy, Economic development -- China, Global Financial Crisis, 2008-2009
Journal or Publication Title: International Affairs
Publisher: Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
ISSN: 0020-5850
Official Date: 21 November 2011
Dates:
DateEvent
21 November 2011Published
Volume: Vol.87
Number: No.6
Page Range: pp. 1323-1343
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2346.2011.01039.x
Status: Peer Reviewed
Publication Status: Published
Access rights to Published version: Restricted or Subscription Access
Funder: Seventh Framework Programme (European Commission) (FP7)
Grant number: 266809 (FP7)

Request changes or add full text files to a record

Repository staff actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics

twitter

Email us: wrap@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us