Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Statistics
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login

Equality in the family home? : Stack v. Dowden [2007] U.K.H.L. 17

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Probert, Rebecca. (2007) Equality in the family home? : Stack v. Dowden [2007] U.K.H.L. 17. Feminist Legal Studies, Vol.15 (No.3). pp. 341-353. ISSN 0966-3622

Full text not available from this repository.
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10691-007-9065-y

Abstract

The recent decision of the House of Lords in Stack v. Dowden appears, at first sight, to endorse a new approach to the jointly owned family home. However, upon closer inspection, this proves to be something of an illusion: the new approach is remarkably similar to the traditional resulting trust in that it attaches more weight to financial payments than to other contributions. A further problem is that the disjunction between the reasoning of the judges and the actual result makes it a difficult decision to apply to future cases. This case-note will consider the legal and social issues raised by the case and will argue that it has the potential to disadvantage women who do not make an equal financial contribution to the purchase of the home.

Item Type: Journal Article
Subjects: H Social Sciences > HQ The family. Marriage. Woman
K Law > KD England and Wales
Divisions: Faculty of Social Sciences > Law
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): Unmarried couples -- Legal status, laws, etc. -- England, Unmarried couples -- Legal status, laws, etc. -- Wales, Cohabitation agreements -- England, Cohabitation agreements -- Wales, Real property -- England, Real property -- Wales, Women -- Legal status, laws, etc.
Journal or Publication Title: Feminist Legal Studies
Publisher: Springer Netherlands
ISSN: 0966-3622
Date: 2007
Volume: Vol.15
Number: No.3
Page Range: pp. 341-353
Identification Number: 10.1007/s10691-007-9065-y
Status: Peer Reviewed
Publication Status: Published
Access rights to Published version: Restricted or Subscription Access
References: Arthur, S., Lewis, J., Maclean, M., Finch, S. & Fitzgerald, R., Settling Up: Making Financial Arrangements After Separation (London: National Centre for Social Research, 2002). Barlow, A., Duncan, S., James, G. & Park, A., Cohabitation, Marriage and the Law: Social Change and Legal Reform in the 21st Century (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2005). Burgoyne, C., Clarke, V., Reibstein, J. & Edmunds, A., ‘‘All My Worldly Goods I Share With You? Managing Money at the Transition to Heterosexual Marriage’’, The Sociological Review 54/4 (2006), 619–637. Dewar, J., ‘‘Land, Law and the Family Home’’, in Land Law: Themes and Perspectives, eds. S. Bright & J. Dewar (Oxford: OUP, 1998), 327–355. Douglas, G., Pearce, J. & Woodward, H., ‘‘Dealing with Property Issues on Cohabitation Breakdown’’, Family Law 37 (2007), 36–42. Fawcett Society, ‘‘Wimbledon Pays Women Equally – But Will Gordon Brown?’’ (2007), available at http://www.fawcettsociety.org.uk//index.asp?PageID=486. Haskey, J., ‘‘Cohabiting Couples in Great Britain: Accommodation Sharing, Tenure and Property Ownership’’, Population Trends 103 (2001), 26–36. Kiernan, K., ‘‘Unmarried Cohabitation and Parenthood in Britain and France’’, Law and Policy 26/1 (2004), 33–55. Lader, D., Short, S. & Gershuny, J., The Time Use Survey, 2005: How We Spend Our Time (Office for National Statistics, 2006), available at http://www.statistics.gov.uk/articles/nojournal/time_use_2005.pdf. Moffat, G., ‘‘Work-life Balance and Employment Law: Cultural Change or Mission: Impossible?’’, in Family Life and the Law: Under One Roof, ed. R. Probert (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2007), 135–158. Office for National Statistics, 2006 Annual Survey of Hours and Earnings (2006), available at http://www.statistics.gov.uk/pdfdir/ashe1006.pdf. Probert, R., ‘‘Trusts and the Modern Woman: Establishing an Interest in the Family Home’’, Child and Family Law Quarterly 13 (2001), 275–286. Probert, R., ‘‘Land, Law and Ex-lovers’’, Conveyancer and Property Lawyer 69 (2005), 168–173. Ramos, X., ‘‘Domestic Work Time and Gender Differentials in Great Britain 1992– 1998’’, International Journal of Manpower 26/3 (2001), 265–295. Stewart, A., ‘‘Home or Home: Caring About and For Elderly Family Members in a Welfare State’’, in Family Life and the Law: Under One Roof, ed. R. Probert (Ashgate: Aldershot, 2007), 159–177. Summerfield, C. & Babb, P. (eds.), Social Trends 33 (London: T.S.O, 2003). Tennant, R., Taylor, J. & Lewis, J., Separating From Cohabitation: Making Arrangements for Finances and Parenting (London: DCA Research Series 7/06, 2006). Vogler, C., Brockmann, M. & Wiggins, R., ‘‘Intimate Relationships and Changing Patterns of Money Management at the Beginning of the Twenty-First Century’’, The British Journal of Sociology 57/3 (2006), 455–482. Wilson, J., ‘‘Tripping Up on the TR1’’, Family Law 36 (2006), 305–311.
URI: http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/39408

Request changes to a record

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item
twitter

Email us: publications@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us