Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Statistics
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login

Cohabitants and joint ownership : the implications of Stack v Dowden

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Probert, Rebecca. (2007) Cohabitants and joint ownership : the implications of Stack v Dowden. Family Law . pp. 924-929. ISSN 0014-7281

Full text not available from this repository.
Official URL: http://www.familylaw.co.uk/articles/cohabitants-an...

Abstract

Rebecca Probert, University of Warwick. In Stack v Dowden [2007] UKHL 17, [2007] 1 FLR 1858 the House of Lords held unanimously that if a property was conveyed into or registered in joint names, the presumption would be that equity followed the law, and by a majority that in the context of the family home this presumption was so strong that it could not be rebutted merely by evidence of unequal contributions. As Baroness Hale of Richmond put it, cases in which the joint legal owners are to be taken to have intended that their beneficial interests should be different from their legal interests will be very unusual. Stack was the first case at this level to focus on the particular circumstances of cohabiting couples. Even if legislation is passed in line with the Law Commissions recent recommendations so as to provide a remedy for cohabiting couples on separation, property law will remain of relevance if it should prove necessary to ascertain their shares during the relationship (eg if there is a dispute with a third party), or on the death of one of the parties, or if the parties fail to satisfy the eligibility criteria. In this article, Rebecca Probert considers the impact of the case on cohabiting, owner-occupier, couples who purchased their property before 1997 and the changes to Land Registry forms, looking at whether a beneficial joint tenancy should be inferred from a legal joint tenancy, and what factors should be taken into account in inferring an intention to share the beneficial interest unequally. For the full article see October [2007] Fam Law.

Item Type: Journal Article
Subjects: K Law > KD England and Wales
Divisions: Faculty of Social Sciences > Law
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): Unmarried couples -- Legal status, laws, etc. -- England, Unmarried couples -- Legal status, laws, etc. -- Wales, Cohabitation agreements -- England, Cohabitation agreements -- Wales, Real property -- England, Real property -- Wales
Journal or Publication Title: Family Law
Publisher: Jordan Publishing Ltd.
ISSN: 0014-7281
Date: 11 October 2007
Page Range: pp. 924-929
Status: Peer Reviewed
Publication Status: Published
Access rights to Published version: Restricted or Subscription Access
URI: http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/39410

Request changes to a record

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item
twitter

Email us: publications@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us