Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Statistics
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login

What is a critical journal?

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Parker, Martin, 1962- and Thomas, Robyn. (2011) What is a critical journal? Organization, Vol.18 (No.4). pp. 419-427. ISSN 1350-5084

[img] PDF
WRAP_Parker_What_is_a_Critical_Journal_v4.pdf - Accepted Version
Restricted to Repository staff only until 1 July 2012. - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader

Download (230Kb)
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1350508411403535

Abstract

Most competent editors should be able to make a clear statement about the scope, purposes and values of their journal. The boundary that they then draw provides a ground for justifications of acceptance and rejection, as well as a description of some sort of community, or a group that broadly recognizes itself as such. Sometimes, the community might be primarily articulated as oppositional, in the sense that it relies on not being something else. Organization, as a ‘critical’ journal with a strong statement about its distinctiveness, often seems to fall into this category. Implicitly or explicitly, ‘they’ are conservative whilst ‘we’ are radical. One term is defined by its other, and so a description of the conservatives is the antonym of the radicals. There is something comforting, even pious, about such a logic, suggesting, perhaps, that ‘they’ are stupid, narrow minded or deluded whilst ‘we’ are clear sighted and pure of heart. The logic is reversible of course, since the other side usually claims those virtues too. Such is the way that community and identity are often built, but it’s an unstable set-up.

Item Type: Journal Article
Subjects: H Social Sciences > HF Commerce
P Language and Literature > PN Literature (General)
Divisions: Faculty of Social Sciences > Warwick Business School
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): Organization, Business -- Periodicals, Periodicals -- History and criticism
Journal or Publication Title: Organization
Publisher: Sage Publications Ltd.
ISSN: 1350-5084
Date: 2011
Volume: Vol.18
Number: No.4
Page Range: pp. 419-427
Identification Number: 10.1177/1350508411403535
Status: Peer Reviewed
Publication Status: Published
Access rights to Published version: Restricted or Subscription Access
References: Alvesson, M, Bridgman, T and Willmott, H (eds) (2009) The Oxford Handbook of Critical Management Studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Becher, T and Trowler, P (2001) Academic Tribes and Territories (2nd edition). Buckingham: SRHE/Open University Press. Bourdieu. P (1990) Homo Academicus. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press. Bullock, A and Stallybrass, O (1977) The Fontana Dictionary of Modern Thought. London: Fontana. Burrell, G, Calás, M, Reed, M, Smircich, L and Whitaker, A (1994) ‘Why Organization? Why now?’ Organization 1/1: 3-9. Cooke, B, Perrow, C, Stookey, S, Adler, P, Willmott, H, Cunliffe, A and Voronov, M (2008) ‘Speaking Out on the Future of Critical Management Studies’ Organization 15/6: 912-945. Douglas, M (1987) How Institutions Think. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul. Dunne, S, Harney, S and Parker, M (2008) ‘The Responsibilities of Management Intellectuals: A Survey’ Organization 15/2: 271-282. Editors (2003) ‘Why Neo-Disciplinary? Why Now?’ Organization 10/3: 403-420. Grey, C (2010) ‘Organizing Studies’ Organization Studies 31/6: 677-694. Grey, C and Willmott, H (2002) ‘Contexts of CMS’ Organization 9/3: 411-418. Jones, O, Sharifi, S and Conway, S (2006) ‘Accounting for Organization: Round up the Usual Suspects’ Accounting, Organizations and Society 17/2-3: 283-304. Meriläinen, S, Tienari, J, Thomas, R and Davies, A (2008) ‘Hegemonic Academic Practices: Experiences of Publishing from the Periphery’ Organization 15/4: 584-597. Parker, M (2010) ‘The Sclerosis of Criticism: A Handbook of Critical Management Studies?’ Critical Policy Studies 4/3: 297-302. Thompson, P (2004) ‘A critical reflection on Critical Management Studies’. In Fleetwood, S and Ackroyd, S (eds) Critical Realist applications in Organization and Management Studies. London: Routledge, 54-70. Troeltsch, E (1912/1956) The Social Teachings of the Christian Churches. London: Allen and Unwin. Walsh, J and Weber, K (2002) ‘The Prospects for Critical Management Studies in the American Academy of Management’ Organization 9/3: 402-410
URI: http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/39463

Data sourced from Thomson Reuters' Web of Knowledge

Request changes to a record

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Document Downloads

More statistics for this item...
twitter

Email us: publications@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us