Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Statistics
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login

Could movement of neonates from non-host plants affect the potential of polyculture to reduce crop colonisation by pest insects?

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

George, D. R. (David R.), Collier, Rosemary, Whitfield, C. and Port, Gordon. (2011) Could movement of neonates from non-host plants affect the potential of polyculture to reduce crop colonisation by pest insects? Crop Protection, Vol.30 (No.8). pp. 1103-1105. ISSN 02612194

Full text not available from this repository.
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2011.04.009

Abstract

Existing and impending constraints to the use of synthetic pesticides, along with changing legislation in favour of an integrated approach to pest management, are driving uptake of ‘alternative’ approaches to pest control. Polyculture is one such approach, often relying upon the presence of non-host plants within the crop to reduce colonisation by pest insects. The diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella (L.), is known to oviposit on non-host plants and the present study showed that neonates were able to move relatively large distances, enabling them to relocate from non-host natal plants to nearby hosts. Although fewer larvae were found on host plants when they hatched on non-hosts, it is concluded that even a low level of re-location of neonates could potentially reduce the potential for polyculture to control this pest. It is proposed that non-host oviposition and neonate movement could explain why polyculture sometimes fails in controlling pest insects.

Item Type: Journal Article
Subjects: S Agriculture > S Agriculture (General)
S Agriculture > SB Plant culture
Divisions: Faculty of Science > Life Sciences (2010- )
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): Plutella -- Control, Plant parasites -- Control, Companion planting -- Evaluation, Larvae -- Dispersal
Journal or Publication Title: Crop Protection
Publisher: Elsevier BV
ISSN: 02612194
Date: 2011
Volume: Vol.30
Number: No.8
Page Range: pp. 1103-1105
Identification Number: 10.1016/j.cropro.2011.04.009
Status: Peer Reviewed
Publication Status: Published
Funder: Horticultural Development Company (HDC)
References: Andow, D.A., 1991. Vegetational diversity and arthropod population response. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 36, 561e586. Badenes-Perez, F.R., Shelton, A.M., Nault, B.A., 2004. Evaluating trap crops for diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae). J. Econ. Entomol. 97, 1365e1372. Charleston, D.S., Kfir, R., 2000. The possibility of using Indian mustard, Brassica juncea, as a trap crop for the diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella, in South Africa. Crop Prot. 19, 455e460. Eigenbrode, S.D., Pillai, S.K., 1998. Neonate Plutella xylostella responses to surface wax components of a resistant cabbage (Brassica oleracea). J. Chem. Ecol. 24, 1611e1627. Finch, S., Collier, R.H., 2000. Host-plant selection by insects e a theory based on ‘appropriate/inappropriate landings’ by pest insects of cruciferous plants. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 96, 91e102. George, D.R., Port, G., Collier, R.H., 2007. Selection of trap crop and companion plants for the management of pest insects in field vegetables. IOBC/WPRS Bull. 30, 113e121. Grzywacz, D., Rossbach, A., Rauf, A., Russell, D.A., Srinivasan, R., Shelton, A.M., 2010. Current control methods for diamondback moth and other brassica insect pests and the prospects for improved management with lepidopteran-resistant Bt vegetable brassicas in Asia and Africa. Crop Prot. 29, 68e79. Henniges-Janssen, K., Schöfl, G., Reineke, A., Heckel, D.G., Groot, A.T., 2011. Oviposition of diamondback moth in the presence and absence of a novel host plant. Bull. Entomol. Res. 101, 99e105. Kienegger, M., Finch, S., 1995. The effect of undersowing with clover on host-plant selection by pest insects of brassica crops. IOBC/WPRS Bull. 19, 108e114. Löhr, B., Gathu, R., 2002. Evidence of adaptation of diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella (L.), to pea, Pisum sativum L. Insect Sci. Appl. 22, 161e173. Perkins, L.E., Cribb, B.W., Hanan, J., Zalucki, M.P., 2010. The movement and distribution of Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner) larvae on pea plants is affected by egg placement and flowering. Bull. Entomol. Res. 100, 591e598. Sarfraz, M., Dosdall, L.M., Keddie, B.A., 2006. Diamondback moth-host plant interactions: Implications for pest management. Crop Prot. 25, 625e639. Zalucki, M.P., Clarke, A.R., Malcolm, S.B., 2002. Ecology and behaviour of first instar larval Lepidoptera. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 47, 361e393.
URI: http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/39498

Data sourced from Thomson Reuters' Web of Knowledge

Request changes to a record

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item
twitter

Email us: publications@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us