The Library

No-onset looming motion guides spatial attention

Tools

von Mühlenen, Adrian and Lleras, Alejandro. (2007) No-onset looming motion guides spatial attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, Vol.33 (No.6). pp. 1297-1310. ISSN 0096-1523

Preview

PDF
WRAP_Von_Muhlenen_HvMK.pdf - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
Download (313Kb)

Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.33.6.1297

Abstract

These 6 experiments explored the ability of moving random dot patterns to attract attention, as measured by a simple probe-detection task. Each trial began with random motion (i.e., dots linearly moved in random directions). After 1 s motion in 1 hemifield became gradually coherent (i.e., all dots moved up-, down-, left-, or rightwards, or either towards or away from a vanishing point). The results show that only looming motion attracted attention, even when the task became a more demanding discrimination task. This effect is not due to an apparent magnification of stimuli presented in the focus of expansion. When the coherent motion started abruptly, all types of motion attracted attention at a short stimulus onset asynchrony. The looming motion effect only disappeared when attention was drawn to the target location by an arrow. These results suggest that looming motion plays a unique role in guiding spatial attention.

Item Type:	Journal Article
Subjects:	B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology
Divisions:	Faculty of Science > Psychology
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH):	Eye -- Movements, Selectivity (Psychology), Attention
Journal or Publication Title:	Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance
Publisher:	American Psychological Association
ISSN:	0096-1523
Date:	December 2007
Volume:	Vol.33
Number:	No.6
Page Range:	pp. 1297-1310
Identification Number:	10.1037/0096-1523.33.6.1297
Status:	Peer Reviewed
Access rights to Published version:	Restricted or Subscription Access
References:	Andersen, R.A., Essick, G.K., Siegel, R.M. (1987). Neurons of area 7a activated by both visual stimuli and oculomotor behavior. Experimental Brain Research, 67, 316–322. Bacon, W.F., & Egeth, H.E. (1994). Overriding stimulus-driven attentional capture. Perception & Psychophysics, 1994, 485–496. Batista, A.P., Buneo, C.A., Snyder, L.H., & Anderson, R.A. (1999). Reach plans in eye-centered coordinates. Science, 285, 257–260. Carrasco, M. & McElree, B. (2001). Covert attention accelerates the rate of visual information processing. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 98: 5363-5367. Corbetta, M. & Shulman, G.L. (2002). Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 3, 201–215. Dosher, B. & Lu, Z.L. (2000). Noise exclusion in spatial attention. Psychological Science, 11, 139-146. Enns, J.T., Austen, E.L., Di Lollo, V.D., Rauschenberger, R., Yantis, S. (2001). New objects dominate luminance transients in setting attentional priority. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 1287-1302. Folk, C.L. & Remington, R.W. (1998). Selectivity in distraction by irrelevant featural singletons: evidence for two forms of attentional capture. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 847–858. Folk, C.L., Remington, R.W. & Johnston, J.C. (1992). Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 1030–1044. Folk, C.L., Remington, R.W. and Wright, J.H (1994). The structure of attentional control: Contingent attentional capture by apparent motion, abrupt onset, and color. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 317–329. Franconeri, S.L., Hollingsworth, A. and Simons, D.J. (2005). Do new objects capture attention? Psychological Science, 16, 275–281. Friedrich, F.J., Egly, R., Rafal, R.D., & Beck, D. (1998). Spatial attention deficits in humans: A comparison of superior parietal and temporal-parietal junction lesions. Neuropsychology, 12, 193–207. Godijn, R. & Theeuwes, J. (2002). Programming of endogenous and exogenous saccades: Evidence for a competitive integration model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 28, 1039–1054. Hawkins, H.L., Shafto, M.G., Richardson, K. (1988). Effects of target luminance and cue validity on the latency of visual detection. Perception & Psychophysics, 44, 484-92. Hunt, A.R. and Kingstone, A. (2003a). Covert and overt voluntary attention: Linked or independent? Cognitive Brain Research, 18, 102–105. Hunt, A.R. and Kingstone, A. (2003b). Inhibition of return: Dissociating attentional and oculomotor components. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29 (5), 1068-1074. Hunt, A. R. & Klein, R. M. (2002). Eliminating the cost of task set reconfiguration. Memory and Cognition, 30 (4), 529-539. Hunt, A.R., Olk, B., von Mühlenen, A. & Kingstone, A. (2004). Integration of competing saccade programs. Cognitive Brain Research, 19, 206–208. Irwin, D.E., Colcombe, A.M., Kramer, A.F. & Hahn, S. (2000). Attentional and oculomotor capture by onset, luminance, and color singletons. Vision Research, 40, 1443–1458. Jonides, J. & Yantis, S. (1988). Uniqueness of abrupt visual onset in capturing attention. Perception & Psychophysics, 55, 399–411. Juan, C., Shorter-Jacobi, S.M., and Schall, J.D. (2005). Dissociation of spatial attention and saccade preparation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 101, 15541-15554 Khan, A.Z., Pisella, L., Vighetto, A., Cotton, F., Luauté, J., Boisson, D., Salemme, R., Crawford, J.D., & Rossetti, Y. (2005). Optic ataxia error depend on remapped, not viewed, target location. Nature Neuroscience, 8, 418–420. Kim, M.S. & Cave, K.R. (1999). Top-down and bottom-up attentional control: On the nature of interference from a salient distractor. Perception & Psychophysics, 61, 1009–1023. Lu, Z.L. & Dosher, B.A. (2000). Spatial attention: Different mechanisms for central and peripheral temporal precues? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 26, 1534–1548. Ludwig, C.J.H., & Gilchrist, I.D. (2002). Stimulus-driven and goal-driven control over visual selection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28(4), 902-912. Masson, M. E. J., & Loftus, G. R. (2003). Using confidence intervals for graphically based data interpretation. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 57, 203-220. Müller, J.R., Philiastides, M.G. & Newsome, W.T. (2005). Microstimulation of the superior colliculus focuses attention without moving the eyes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102, 524–529. Prinzmetal, W., McCool, C. & Park, S. (2005). Attention: reaction time and accuracy reveal different mechanisms. Journal of Experimental Psychology; General, 143, 73–92. Posner, M.I. (1980). Orienting of attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32, 3–25. Posner, M.I. & Cohen, Y. (1984). Component of visual orienting. In H. Bouma and D. Bonwhuis (Eds.) Attention and Performance X, pp. 551–556. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Remington, R.W., Johnston, J.C., & Yantis, S. (1992). Involuntary attentional capture by abrupt onsets. Perception & Psychophysics, 51, 279-290 Sailer, U., Eggert, T., Ditterich, J., and Straube, A. (2002). Global effect of a nearby distractor on targeting hand and eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 28, 1432–1446. Serences, J.T., Shomstein, S., Leber, A.B., Golay. X., Egeth, H.E. & Yantis, S. (2005). Coordination of voluntary and stimulus-driven attentional control in human cortex. Psychological Science, 16, 114–122. Sumner, P., Adamjee, T. & Mollon, J.D. (2002). Signals invisible to the collicular and magnocellular pathways can capture visual attention. Current Biology, 12, 1312–1316. Taylor, T.L., & Klein, R.M. (1998). On the causes and effects of inhibition of return. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 5, 625–643. Theeuwes, J. (1992). Perceptual sensitivity for color and form. Perception & Psychophysics, 43, 307–318. Theeuwes, J., Atchley, P. & Kramer, A.F. (2000). On the time course of top-down and bottom-up control of visual attention. In S. Monsell and J. Driver (Eds.) Attention and Performance XVIII (pp. 105–124). Cambridge: MIT Press. Theeuwes, J., de Vries, G. & Godijn, R. (2001). Attentional and oculomotor capture with static singletons. Perception & Psychophysics, 65, 735–746. Theeuwes, J. & Godijn, R. (2001). Attentional and oculomotor capture. In C.I. Folk & B.S. Gibson (Eds.) Attraction, Distraction, and Action: Multiple Perspectives on Attentional Capture (pp. 121–150). Amsterdam: Elsevier. Theeuwes, J., Kramer, A.F., Hahn, S. & Irwin, D.E. (1998). The eyes do not always go where we want them to go: Capture of the eyes by new objects. Psychological Science, 9, 379–385. Theeuwes, J., Kramer, A.F., Hahn, S., Irwin, D.E. & Zelinsky, G.J. (1998). Influence of attentional capture on oculomotor control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 25, 1595–1608. Trappenberg, T.P., Dorris, M.C., Munoz, D.P., & Klein, R.M. (2001). A model of saccade initiation based on the competitive integration of exogenous and endogenous signals in the superior colliculus. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 13, 256–271. van Zoest, W., Donk, M. & Theeuwes, J. (2004). The role of stimulus-driven control in saccadic visual selection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 30, 746–759. von Mühlenen, A., Rempel, M., and Enns, J.T. (in press). Unique temporal change is the key to attentional capture. Psychological Science. Wu, S. & Remingston, R.W. (2003). Characteristics of covert and overt visual orienting: Evidence from attentional and oculomotor capture. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 29, 1050–1067. Yantis, S. & Jonides, J. (1984). Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: Evidence from visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 10, 601–620. Yantis, S. & Jonides, J. (1996). Attentional capture by abrupt onsets: New perceptual objects or visual masking? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 22, 1505–1513. Yeshurun, Y. & Carrasco, M. (1998). Attention improves or impairs visual performance by enhancing spatial resolution. Nature, 396, 5 Nov. 72-75.
URI:	http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/396