The Library
In defence of the NHS : why writing to the House of Lords was necessary
Tools
Tools
Tools
McKee, Martin, Pollock, Allyson M., Clarke, Aileen, 1955-, McCoy, David, Middleton, John, Raine, Rosalind and Scott-Samuel, Alex. (2011) In defence of the NHS : why writing to the House of Lords was necessary. BMJ, Vol.343 . d6535. ISSN 0959-535X
![[img]](http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/style/images/fileicons/application_pdf.png)
|
PDF
WRAP_Clarke_1172137-mg-130412-bmj_nhs_bill_0ct_8_2011_ap7.pdf - Accepted Version - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader Download (1030Kb) |
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d6535
Abstract
Last week more than 400 public health doctors, specialists, and academics from across the country wrote an open letter to the House of Lords stating that the Health and Social Care Bill will do "irreparable harm to the NHS, to individual patients, and to society as a whole," that it will "erode the NHS’s ethical and cooperative foundations," and that it will "not deliver efficiency, quality, fairness, or choice."
| Item Type: | Journal Article |
|---|---|
| Subjects: | R Medicine > R Medicine (General) |
| Divisions: | Faculty of Medicine > Warwick Medical School > Warwick Evidence Faculty of Medicine > Warwick Medical School > Health Sciences |
| Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): | National health services -- Political aspects -- Great Britain, National health services -- Great Britain -- Public opinion, Great Britain. National Health Service |
| Journal or Publication Title: | BMJ |
| Publisher: | BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. |
| ISSN: | 0959-535X |
| Date: | 2011 |
| Volume: | Vol.343 |
| Page Range: | d6535 |
| Identification Number: | 10.1136/bmj.d6535 |
| Status: | Peer Reviewed |
| Publication Status: | Published |
| Access rights to Published version: | Restricted or Subscription Access |
| References: | 1. Kmietowicz Z. Public health doctors call for House of Lords to reject health bill. BMJ2011;343:d6391. FREE Full Text 2. Liu Y, Hslao W, Eggleston K. Equity in health care: the Chinese experience. Soc Sci Med1999;49:1349-56. CrossRefMedlineWeb of Science 3. Stocker K, Waitzkin H, Iriart C. The exportation of managed care to Latin America. N Engl J Med1999;340:1131-6. CrossRefMedlineWeb of Science 4. Himmelstein D, Woolhandler S. Quality of care at investor-owned vs not-for-profit HMOs. JAMA1999;282:159-63. FREE Full Text 5. Schoen C, Doty M, Robertson R, Collins S. Affordable Care Act reforms could reduce the number of uninsured US adults by 70 percent. Health Aff (Millwood)2011;30:1762-71. FREE Full Text 6. Pollock AM, Price D. The Health and Social Care Bill: how the secretary of state for health proposes to abolish the NHS in England. BMJ2011;342:1695-7. CrossRef 7. Van de Ven WP, Beck K, Buchner F, Chernichovsky D, Gardiol L, Holly A, et al. Risk adjustment and risk selection on the sickness fund insurance market in five European countries. Health Policy2003;65:75-98. CrossRefMedlineWeb of Science 8. Van de Ven WP. Risk adjustment and risk equalization: what needs to be done? Health Economics, Policy and Law2011;6:147-56. CrossRef 9. Reynolds L, McKee M. “Any qualified provider” in the NHS reforms: but who will qualify? Lancet doi:101016/S0140-6736(11)61264-6. 10. Himmelstein D, Woolhandler S, Hellender I. Bleeding the patient: the consequences of corporate health care. Common Courage Press, 2001 |
| URI: | http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/39616 |
Data sourced from Thomson Reuters' Web of Knowledge
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |
