Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Statistics
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login

Phonographic neighbors, not orthographic neighbors, determine word naming latencies

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Adelman, James S. and Brown, G. D. A. (Gordon D. A.). (2007) Phonographic neighbors, not orthographic neighbors, determine word naming latencies. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review , Vol.14 (No.3). pp. 455-459. ISSN 1069-9384

[img]
Preview
PDF
WRAP_Adelman_neighbour4.pdf - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader

Download (198Kb)
Official URL: http://pbr.psychonomic-journals.org/content/14/3/4...

Abstract

The orthographic neighborhood size (N) of a word—the number of words that can be formed from that word by replacing one letter with another in its place—has been found to have facilitatory effects in word naming. The orthographic neighborhood hypothesis attributes this facilitation to interactive effects. A phonographic neighborhood hypothesis, in contrast, attributes the effect to lexical print-sound conversion. According to the phonographic neighborhood hypothesis, phonographic neighbors (words differing in one letter and one phoneme, e.g., stove and stone) should facilitate naming, and other orthographic neighbors (e.g., stove and shove) should not. The predictions of these two hypotheses are tested. Unique facilitatory phonographic N effects were found in four sets of word naming mega-study data, along with an absence of facilitatory orthographic N effects. These results implicate print-sound conversion—based on consistent phonology—in neighborhood effects rather than word-letter feedback.

Item Type: Journal Article
Subjects: B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology
Divisions: Faculty of Science > Psychology
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): Language and languages -- Research, Language and languages -- Orthography and spelling
Journal or Publication Title: Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
Publisher: Psychonomic Society
ISSN: 1069-9384
Date: 2007
Volume: Vol.14
Number: No.3
Page Range: pp. 455-459
Status: Not Peer Reviewed
Access rights to Published version: Open Access
Funder: Economic and Social Research Council (Great Britain) (ESRC), Leverhulme Trust (LT), University of Warwick
Grant number: RES 000221558 (ESRC), F/215/AY (Leverhulme)
References:
URI: http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/400

Data sourced from Thomson Reuters' Web of Knowledge

Request changes to a record

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Document Downloads

More statistics for this item...
twitter

Email us: publications@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us