Kramer, Anne-Marie Caroline. (2011) Kinship, affinity and connectedness : exploring the role of genealogy in personal lives. Sociology, Vol.45 (No.3). pp. 379-395. ISSN 0038-0385

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

Drawing on the 2008 Mass Observation Directive 'Doing Family Research', this article explores the role of genealogy in personal lives from the perspective of genealogists and non-genealogists in the UK. Analysing the ends to which genealogy is put, it finds that genealogy is a key kinship practice, mapping connectedness, offering a resource for identity-work, and allowing belonging in time. Engaging with anthropological work on kinship, relatedness and remembrance and with recent sociological work on identity and affinity, this article explores how family history as a creative and imaginative memory and kinship practice is simultaneously used to map affinities and connectedness, enact relatedness, and produce self-identity. It argues that examining the role of genealogy and the genealogical imaginary reveals that conventional as well as non-conventional kinship produces partial and insecure identities. This compels everyday personal engagement with the meaning and legacy of inheritance for collective and individual identification and identity.

[error in script] [error in script]

Item Type:	Journal Article
Subjects:	C Auxiliary Sciences of History > CS Genealogy H Social Sciences > HM Sociology
Divisions:	Faculty of Social Sciences > Sociology
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH):	Belonging (Social psychology), Genealogy, Kinship, Group identity, Identity (Psychology)
Journal or Publication Title:	Sociology
Publisher:	Sage Publications Ltd.
ISSN:	0038-0385
Date:	June 2011
Volume:	Vol.45
Number:	No.3
Page Range:	pp. 379-395
Identification Number:	10.1177/0038038511399622
Status:	Peer Reviewed
Publication Status:	Published
Access rights to Published version:	Restricted or Subscription Access
References:	Basu P (2004) My own island home – the Orkney homecoming. Journal of Material Culture 9(1): 27–42. Basu P (2005) Macpherson country: Genealogical identities, spatial histories and the Scottish diasporic clanscape. Cultural Geographies 12(2): 123–50. Bear L (2007) Ruins and ghosts: The domestic uncanny and the materialization of Anglo-Indian genealogies in Kharagpur. In: Carsten J (ed.) Ghosts of Memory: Essays on Remembrance and Relatedness. Oxford: Blackwell. Beck U and Beck-Gernsheim E (2002) Individualization: Institutionalized Individualism and its Social and Political Consequences. London: Sage. Bishop R (2005) ‘The essential force of the clan’: Developing a collecting-inspired ideology of genealogy through textual analysis. Journal of Popular Culture 38(6): 990–1010. Bytheway B (2005) Age-identities and the celebration of birthdays. Ageing and Society 25(4): 463–77. Carsten J (ed.) (2000a) Cultures of Relatedness: New Approaches to the Study of Kinship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Carsten J (2000b) ‘Knowing where you’ve come from’: Ruptures and continuities of time and kinship in narratives of adoption reunions. The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 6(4): 687–703. Carsten J (2004) After Kinship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Carsten J (2007) Introduction: Ghosts of memory. In: Carsten J (ed.) Ghosts of Memory: Essays on Remembrance and Relatedness. Oxford: Blackwell. Champagne D (1990) The genealogical search as a counseling technique. Journal of Counseling and Development 69(1): 85–7. Edwards J and Strathern M (2000) Including our own. In: Carsten J (ed.) Cultures of Relatedness: New Approaches to the Study of Kinship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 149–66. Erben M (1991) Genealogy and sociology – a preliminary set of statements and speculations. Sociology 25(2): 275–92. Finch J and Mason J (2000) Passing On: Kinship and Inheritance in England. London: Routledge. Hallam E and Hockey J (2001) Death, Memory & Material Culture. Oxford: Berg. Jerrome D (1996) The Family in Time and Space: Personal Conceptions of Kinship. Mass-Observation Archive Occasional Paper No. 6. Brighton: University of Sussex Library. Lambert R (1996) The family historian and temporal orientations towards the ancestral past. Time and Society 5(2): 115–43. Lawler S (2008) Identity: Sociological Perspectives. Cambridge: Polity. Mason J (2008) Tangible affinities and the real life fascination of kinship. Sociology 42(1): 29–45. Nash C (2005) Geographies of relatedness. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 30(4): 449–62. Purbrick L (2003) Wedding presents: Marriage gifts and the limits of consumption, Britain, 1945–2000. Journal of Design History 16(3): 215–27. Saar M (2002) Genealogy and subjectivity. European Journal of Philosophy 10(2): 231–45. Shaw J (1998) Intellectual Property, Representative Experience and Mass-Observation. Mass-Observation Archive Occasional Paper No. 9. Brighton: University of Sussex Library. Sheridan D (1993) Writing to the Archive: Mass-Observation as autobiography. Sociology 27(1): 27–40. Sheridan D (1996) ‘Damned Anecdotes and Dangerous Confabulations’: Mass-Observation as Life History. Mass-Observation Archive Occasional Paper No. 7. Brighton: University of Sussex Library. Smart C (2007) Personal Life. Cambridge: Polity. Strathern M (1992) After Nature: English Kinship in the Late Twentieth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Strathern M (2005) Kinship, Law and the Unexpected: Relatives Are Often a Surprise. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Taylor R (1982) Summoning the wandering tribes – genealogy and family reunions in American history. Journal of Social History 16(2): 21–37. Tyler K (2005) The genealogical imagination: The inheritance of interracial identities. The Sociological Review 53(3): 476–94.
URI:	http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/40008

Data sourced from Thomson Reuters' Web of Knowledge

Request changes to a record

Actions (login required)

View Item