Watson, Matthew, 1969-. (2013) The eighteenth-century historiographic tradition and contemporary 'Everyday IPE'. Review of International Studies, volume 39 (number 1). pp. 1-23. ISSN 0260-2015

Preview

Text WRAP_Watson_241111-riseverydayipesept11wrap.pdf - Accepted Version Download (344Kb)

Abstract

This paper focuses on Adam Smith’s largely sympathetic response to the Rousseauian critique of the moral degeneracy of modern ‘economic man’. It thus emphasises his philosophical ambivalence towards commercial society over the textbook IPE presentations which ascribe to him an almost wholly unreflexive market advocacy. In doing so it provides important methodological lessons for the study of Everyday IPE today. Arnaldo Momigliano has identified a decisive break in historical method in the eighteenth century, of which Smith and Rousseau were key exponents. However unwittingly, contemporary Everyday IPE scholars are the spiritual heirs of the eighteenth-century move from writing public histories of the state to writing private histories of unnamed individuals who embody the most recent phase of human sociability. The eighteenth-century economic man was conceptualised in relation to evolving forms of economic organisation, where the economy in turn was thought to reflect the prevailing system of ‘manners’. Smith united with Rousseau in the belief that their society’s bourgeois politeness allowed materialist ideologies to corrupt the moral autonomy of the individual. The historical method underpinning such concerns also allows Everyday IPE scholars to ground similarly-styled attempts to understand threats to moral autonomy arising from the struggle over economic surplus today.

Item Type:	Journal Article
Subjects:	D History General and Old World > DA Great Britain D History General and Old World > DC France H Social Sciences > HB Economic Theory J Political Science > JA Political science (General) J Political Science > JC Political theory
Divisions:	Faculty of Social Sciences > Politics and International Studies
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH):	Smith, Adam, 1723-1790 -- Criticism and interpretation, Rousseau, Jean-Jacques, 1712-1778 -- Criticism and interpretation, Economic man, Economics -- Historiography, France -- Economic policy -- 18th century, France -- Economic conditions -- 18th century, Great Britain -- Economic policy -- 18th century, Great Britain -- Economic conditions -- 18th century
Journal or Publication Title:	Review of International Studies
Publisher:	Cambridge University Press
ISSN:	0260-2015
Date:	21 January 2013
Volume:	volume 39
Number:	number 1
Page Range:	pp. 1-23
Identification Number:	10.1017/S0260210511000799
Status:	Peer Reviewed
Publication Status:	Published
Access rights to Published version:	Restricted or Subscription Access
References:	* I am extremely grateful to the anonymous referees who provided me with such informative, insightful and helpful comments on my original submission, as well as to the journal’s editors in making it crystal clear how they would like me to respond. 1 See, amongst others, Louise Amoore, Globalisation Contested: An International Political Economy of Work (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2002); Juanita Elias, Fashioning Inequality: The Multinational Company and Gendered Employment in a Globalizing World (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2004); Marianne Franklin, Postcolonial Politics, the Internet, and Everyday Life (London: Routledge, 2004); Rob Aitken, Performing Capital: Toward a Cultural Economy of Popular and Global Finance (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007); Alison Watson, The Child in International Political Economy: A Place at the Table (London: Routledge, 2009). 2 Benjamin J. Cohen, International Political Economy: An Intellectual History (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2008). 3 For an early precursor, see, Craig Murphy and Roger Tooze, ‘Getting Beyond the “Common Sense” of the IPE Orthodoxy’, in Craig Murphy and Roger Tooze (eds), The New International Political Economy (London: Lynne Rienner, 1991). 4 See, in particular, Arnaldo Momigliano, ‘Ancient History and the Antiquarian’, Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes, 13:3/4 (1950), pp.285-315; Arnaldo Momigliano, ‘Gibbon’s Contribution to Historical Method’, Historia, 2:4 (1954), pp.450-63. 5 Mark Salber Phillips, ‘Reconsiderations on History and Antiquarianism: Arnaldo Momigliano and the Historiography of Eighteenth-Century Britain’, Journal of the History of Ideas, 57:2 (1996), pp.297- 316, p.300. 6 J.G.A. Pocock, ‘Adam Smith and History’, in Knud Haakonssen (ed), The Cambridge Companion to Adam Smith (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006), p.27. 7 This general tendency is really well captured – and critiqued – in: Vivienne Brown, ‘Metanarratives and Economic Discourse’, Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 96:1 (1994), pp.83-93; see also William Tabb, Reconstructing Political Economy: The Great Divide in Economic Thought (London: Routledge, 1999). 8 An important book showing why this was not the case is: David Colander, The Lost Art of Economics: Essays on Economics and the Economics Profession (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2001). 9 Robert Heilbroner, Teachings from the Worldly Philosophers, new edition (London: W.W. Norton, 1997), p.246. 10 D.R. Woolf, ‘A Feminine Past? Gender, Genre, and Historical Knowledge in England, 1500-1800’, American Historical Review, 102:3 (1997), pp.645-679, pp.665-7. 11 Mark Salber Phillips, Society and Sentiment: Genres of Historical Writing in Britain, 1740-1820 (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2000), pp.176-7. 12 Adam Smith, ‘A Letter to the Authors of the Edinburgh Review’, reprinted in Adam Smith, Essays on Philosophical Subjects, edited by J.C. Bryce (Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Press, 1982 [1756]). 13 Samuel Fleischacker, On Adam Smith’s Wealth of Nations: A Philosophical Companion (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2004), p.117. 14 Dennis Rasmussen, The Problems and Promise of Commercial Society: Adam Smith’s Response to Rousseau (University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press, 2008), p.60. 15 Matthew Watson, Foundations of International Political Economy (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005), pp.172-7. 16 John Hobson and Leonard Seabrooke, ‘Everyday IPE: Revealing Everyday Forms of Change in the World Economy’, in John Hobson and Leonard Seabrooke (eds), Everyday Politics of the World Economy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008). 17 One excellent example of such work is: Benedict Kerkvliet, The Power of Everyday Politics (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2005). Another example is: Adam David Morton, ‘Peasants as Subaltern Agents in Latin America: Neoliberalism, Resistance and the Power of the Powerless’, in John Hobson and Leonard Seabrooke (eds), Everyday Politics of the World Economy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008). 18 See, for example: Matt Davies and Magnus Ryner (eds), Poverty and the Production of World Politics: Unprotected Workers in the Global Political Economy (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2006); Paul Langley, The Everyday Life of Global Finance: Saving and Borrowing in Anglo-America (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008). 19 David Blaney and Naeem Inayatullah, ‘Undressing the Wound of Wealth: Political Economy as a Cultural Project’, in Jacqueline Best and Matthew Paterson (eds), Cultural Political Economy (London: Routledge, 2009). 20 Jacqueline Best and Matthew Paterson, ‘Introduction: Understanding Cultural Political Economy’, in Jacqueline Best and Matthew Paterson (eds), Cultural Political Economy (London: Routledge, 2009). 21 Craig Murphy and Roger Tooze, ‘Introduction’, in Craig Murphy and Roger Tooze (eds), The New International Political Economy (London: Lynne Rienner, 1991), p.6. 22 Stephen Rosow, ‘Echoes of Commercial Society: Liberal Political Theory in Mainstream IPE’, in Kurt Burch and Robert Denemark (eds), Constituting International Political Economy (London: Lynne Rienner, 1997), pp.42-4. 23 On which, see Emma Rothschild, Economic Sentiments: Adam Smith, Condorcet, and the Enlightenment (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2001), pp.116-56. 24 This has been described as nothing less than a ‘renaissance’ in Smith studies. See: Horst Claus Recktenwald, ‘An Adam Smith Renaissance anno 1976? The Bicentenary Output. A Reappraisal of his Scholarship’, Journal of Economic Literature, 16:1 (1978), pp.56-83. 25 Leonidas Montes, Adam Smith in Context: A Critical Reassessment of some Central Components of His Thought (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2004). 26 Smith admired Gibbon as a person, but Rousseau did not. See respectively: John Rae, Life of Adam Smith (London: Macmillan, 1895), p.414; David Edmonds and John Eidinow, Rousseau’s Dog: Two Great Thinkers at War in the Age of Enlightenment (London: Faber and Faber, 2006), p.57. 27 Momigliano, ‘Gibbon’s Contribution to Historical Method’, p.459. 28 Momigliano, ‘Gibbon’s Contribution to Historical Method’, p.457. 29 Momigliano, ‘Gibbon’s Contribution to Historical Method’, p.453. 30 Momigliano, ‘Ancient History and the Antiquarian’, p.307. 31 Momigliano, ‘Gibbon’s Contribution to Historical Method’, p.453. 32 Phillips, ‘Reconsiderations on History and Antiquarianism’, pp.297-8. 33 Arnaldo Momigliano, ‘The Introduction of the Teaching of History as an Academic Subject and Its Implications’, Minerva, 21:1 (1983), pp.1-15, p.3. 34 Marc Bloch, The Historian’s Craft (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1992), p.27. 35 Momigliano, ‘Gibbon’s Contribution to Historical Method’, p.459. 36 J.G.A. Pocock, Barbarism and Religion, Volume Two: Narratives of Civil Government (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999), p.27. 37 Ian Watt, The Rise of the Novel: Studies in Defoe, Richardson and Fielding (London: Chatto and Windus, 1974), p.38. 38 Manuel Schonhorn, Defoe’s Politics: Parliament, Power, Kingship, and Robinson Crusoe (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991), pp.47-50. 39 Karen O’Brien, Narratives of Enlightenment: Cosmopolitan History from Voltaire to Gibbon (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997), p.5. 40 Momigliano, ‘The Introduction of the Teaching of History’, p.7. 41 G.W. Bowerstock, ‘Momigliano’s Quest for the Person’, History and Theory, 30:4 (1991), pp.27-36, p.28. 42 Maureen Harkin, ‘Adam Smith’s Missing History: Primitives, Progress, and Problems of Genre’, English Literary History, 72:2 (2005), pp.429-51, pp.438-9. 43 Mark Salber Phillips, ‘Adam Smith and the History of Private Life: Social and Sentimental Narratives in Eighteenth-Century Historiography’, in Donald Kelley and David Harris Sacks (eds), The Historical Imagination in Early Modern Britain: History, Rhetoric, and Fiction, 1500-1800 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997), p.326. 44 Peter Miller, ‘Momigliano, Benjamin, and Antiquarianism after the Crisis of Historicism’, in Peter Miller (ed), Momigliano and Antiquarianism: Foundations of the Modern Cultural Sciences (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2007), p.337. 45 N.J. Allen, ‘The Category of the Person: A Reading of Mauss’s Last Essay’, in Michael Carrithers, Steven Collins and Steven Lukes (eds), The Category of the Person: Anthropology, Philosophy, History (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985), p.39. 46 Pocock, Barbarism and Religion, Volume Two, p.20. 47 Harkin, ‘Adam Smith’s Missing History’, p.439. 48 Michael Ignatieff, The Needs of Strangers (London: Chatto and Windus, 1984), pp.111-13. 49 Christopher Berry, The Idea of Luxury: A Conceptual and Historical Investigation (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994), p.136. 50 Albert Hirschman, The Passions and the Interests: Political Arguments for Capitalism before Its Triumph, Twentieth Anniversary Edition (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1997 [1977]), pp.56-63. 51 Deirdre McCloskey, The Bourgeois Virtues: Ethics for an Age of Commerce (Chicago, ILL: Chicago University Press, 2006), pp.72-6. 52 Helena Rosenblatt, Rousseau and Geneva: From the First Discourse to the Social Contract, 1749- 1762 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997), pp.60-2. 53 Phillips, Society and Sentiment, pp.176-7. 54 Woolf, ‘A Feminine Past?’, p.653. 55 O’Brien, Narratives of Enlightenment, p.16. 56 Mary Poovey, A History of the Modern Fact: Problems of Knowledge in the Sciences of Wealth and Society (Chicago, ILL: University of Chicago Press), pp.214-63. 57 Jean-Jacques Rousseau, Politics and the Arts: Letter to M. d’Alembert on the Theater, translated with notes and an introduction by Allan Bloom (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1968 [1758]). 58 Timothy Costelloe, ‘The Theater of Morals: Culture and Community in Rousseau’s Lettre á M. d’Alembert’, Eighteenth-Century Life, 27:1 (2003), pp.52-71, p.55. 59 Amal Banerjee, ‘Rousseau’s Concept of Theatre’, British Journal of Aesthetics, 17:2 (1977), pp.171- 7, pp.172-3. 60 See Momigliano, ‘Gibbon’s Contribution to Historical Method’, p.459. 61 David Marshall, ‘Rousseau and the State of Theater’, Representations, 13:1 (1986), pp.84-114, p.84. 62 Rousseau, Politics and the Arts, p.22. 63 Jean-Jacques Rousseau, ‘A Discourse on the Origin of Inequality’, in Jean-Jacques Rousseau, The Social Contract and Discourses, translated and introduced by G.D.H. Cole (London: Everyman, 1993 [1754]), pp.95-6. 64 Jean-Jacques Rousseau, ‘A Discourse on Political Economy’, in Jean-Jacques Rousseau, The Social Contract and Discourses, translated and introduced by G.D.H. Cole (London: Everyman, 1993 [1755]), p.147. 65 Istvan Hont, ‘Free Trade and the Economic Limits to National Politics: Neo-Machiavellian Political Economy Reconsidered’, in John Dunn (ed), The Economic Limits to Modern Politics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990), p.48. 66 Jean-Jacques Rousseau, The Reveries of the Solitary Walker, translated, with preface, notes and an interpretative essay by Charles E. Butterworth (Cambridge: Hackett Publishing Company, 1992), p.115. 67 Jean-Jacques Rousseau, ‘A Discourse on the Moral Effects of the Arts and Sciences’, in Jean-Jacques Rousseau, The Social Contract and Discourses, translated and introduced by G.D.H. Cole (London: Everyman, 1993 [1750]), p.6. 68 Michael Locke McLendon, ‘The Overvaluation of Talent: An Interpretation and Application of Rousseau’s Amour-Propre’, Polity, 36:1 (2003), pp.115-38, p.123. 69 Benjamin Barber, ‘Rousseau and the Paradoxes of the Dramatic Imagination’, Daedalus, 107:3 (1978), pp.79-92, p.79. 70 O’Brien, Narratives of Enlightenment, p.5. 71 Rousseau, ‘A Discourse on the Origin of Inequality’, p.75. 72 Costelloe, ‘The Theater of Morals’, p.58. 73 Rousseau, Politics and the Arts, p.57. 74 Rousseau, The Reveries of the Solitary Walker, p.118. 75 Rousseau, ‘A Discourse on the Origin of Inequality’, p.86, p.88. 76 Rosenblatt, Rousseau and Geneva, p.127. 77 Jean-Jacques Rousseau, Émile, Or Treatise on Education, translated by Barbara Foxley (New York: BiblioBazaar, 2006 [1762]), p.149. 78 Jonathan Marks, ‘The Savage Pattern: The Unity of Rousseau’s Thought Revisited’, Polity, 31:1 (1998), pp.75-105, p.89. 79 Rousseau, Émile, p.562. 80 Marshall, ‘Rousseau and the State of Theater’, p.85. 81 Ryan Hanley, ‘Commerce and Corruption: Rousseau’s Diagnosis and Adam Smith’s Cure’, European Journal of Political Theory, 7:2 (2008), pp.137-58, p.139. 82 Rousseau, ‘A Discourse on the Moral Effects of the Arts and Sciences’, p.29. 83 Rousseau, Émile, p.264. 84 McLendon, ‘The Overvaluation of Talent’, pp.117-19. 85 Rousseau, ‘A Discourse on Political Economy’, pp.160-2. 86 Graeme Garrard, Rousseau’s Counter-Enlightenment: A Republican Critique of the Philosophes (Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, 2003), p.48. 87 Rousseau, ‘A Discourse on the Origin of Inequality’, p.112. 88 Peter Melville, ‘The Sleepy Carib: Rousing the ‘Native Informant’ in Rousseau’, European Romantic Review, 13:2 (2002), pp.183-9, p.183. 89 Nancy Yousef, ‘Savage or Solitary?: The Wild Child and Rousseau’s Man of Nature’, Journal of the History of Ideas, 62:2 (2001), pp.245-63, p.263. 90 Watson, Foundations of International Political Economy, pp.101-8. 91 Nicholas Dent, A Rousseau Dictionary (Oxford: Blackwell, 1992), p.29. 92 Adam Smith, The Theory of Moral Sentiments, The Glasgow Edition of the Works and Correspondence of Adam Smith, edited by David Daiches Raphael and Alec Macfie from a composite of all seven editions (Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund, 1982 [1759/1790]), I.iii.3.1. 93 Ronald Meek, ‘New Light on Adam Smith’s Glasgow Lectures on Jurisprudence’, History of Political Economy, 8:4 (1976), pp.439-77, p.440. 94 Donald Winch, Adam Smith’s Politics: An Essay in Historiographic Revision (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1978), p.127. 95 Smith, The Theory of Moral Sentiments, III.3.34. 96 Smith, The Theory of Moral Sentiments, I.ii.3.4. 97 Smith, The Theory of Moral Sentiments, V.2.13. 98 Rousseau, ‘A Discourse on the Moral Effects of the Arts and Sciences’, p.6. 99 Smith, The Theory of Moral Sentiments, V.2.3. 100 Louis Schneider, ‘Adam Smith on Human Nature and Social Circumstance’, in Gerald O’Driscoll (ed), Adam Smith and Modern Political Economy: Bicentennial Essays on The Wealth of Nations (Ames, IA: Iowa State University Press, 1979), p.57. 101 Smith, The Theory of Moral Sentiments, IV.1.8. 102 I am grateful to one of the journal’s anonymous referees for getting me to focus on this aspect of the argument. 103 Smith, The Theory of Moral Sentiments, I.iii.3.2. 104 Harkin, ‘Adam Smith’s Missing History’, p.433. 105 Smith, The Theory of Moral Sentiments, VII.iv.6. 106 Banerjee, ‘Rousseau’s Concept of Theater’, pp.175-6. 107 Smith, The Theory of Moral Sentiments, I.iii.3.6. 108 Smith, The Theory of Moral Sentiments, I.iii.3.6. 109 Smith, The Theory of Moral Sentiments, IV.1.6. 110 Smith, The Theory of Moral Sentiments, IV.1.6, IV.1.10. 111 Smith, The Theory of Moral Sentiments, IV.1.8. 112 Smith, The Theory of Moral Sentiments, IV.1.8. 113 Smith, The Theory of Moral Sentiments, IV.1.8. 114 Charles Griswold, Adam Smith and the Virtues of Enlightenment (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999), p.165. 115 Rothschild, Economic Sentiments, p.231. 116 James Otteson, Adam Smith’s Marketplace of Life (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002), pp.122-4. 117 Smith, The Theory of Moral Sentiments, III.2.1. 118 Hanley, ‘Commerce and Corruption’, p.144. 119 Thomas Pangle, ‘The Classical and Modern Liberal Understandings of Honor’, in Peter McNamara (ed), The Noblest Minds: Fame, Honor, and the American Founding (Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 1998), p.211. 120 Smith, The Theory of Moral Sentiments, I.ii.intro.2, VI.iii.11. 121 Fleischacker, On Adam Smith’s Wealth of Nations, pp.87-90. 122 Smith, The Theory of Moral Sentiments, III.2.1. 123 Smith, The Theory of Moral Sentiments, III.2.4. 124 Smith, The Theory of Moral Sentiments, III.2.7. 125 Smith, The Theory of Moral Sentiments, III.2.32. 126 Rousseau, Émile, p.265. 127 Pierre Force, Self-Interest before Adam Smith: A Genealogy of Economic Science (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003), p.122. 128 Smith, The Theory of Moral Sentiments, I.iii.3.2. 129 Smith, The Theory of Moral Sentiments, III.3.41. 130 Smith, The Theory of Moral Sentiments, I.iii.3.2. 131 Smith, The Theory of Moral Sentiments, III.3.41. 132 Smith, The Theory of Moral Sentiments, IV.1.11. 133 Smith, The Theory of Moral Sentiments, III.3.43.
URI:	http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/40090

Request changes to a record

Actions (login required)

View Item