Adelman, J. S. (2005). Regularity and length effects in word naming: A test of the dual
route cascaded model. In B. G. Bara, L. Barsalou, & M. Bucciarelli (Eds.),
Proceedings of the twenty-seventh annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society
(pp. 57–61). Alpha, NJ: Sheridan Printing.
Adelman, J. S., & Brown, G. D. A. (2007). Phonographic neighbors, not orthographic
neighbors, determine word naming latencies. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14,
455–459.
Adelman, J. S., & Brown, G. D. A. (in press). Modeling lexical decision: The form of
frequency and diversity effects. Psychological Review.
Adelman, J. S., Brown, G. D. A., & Quesada, J. F. (2006). Contextual diversity, not word
frequency, determines word-naming and lexical decision times. Psychological Science,
17, 814–823.
Andrews, S. (1989). Frequency and neighborhood effects on lexical access: Activation or
search? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15,
802–814.
Andrews, S. (1992). Frequency and neighborhood effects on lexical access: Lexical
similarity or orthographic redundancy? Journal of Experimental Psychology:
Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 234–254.
Andrews, S., & Scarratt, D. R. (1998). Rule and analogy mechanisms in reading
nonwords: Hough dou peapel rede gnew wirds? Journal of Experimental Psychology:
Human Perception and Performance, 24, 1052–1086.
Andrews, S., Woollams, A., & Bond, R. (2005). Spelling-sound typicality only affects
words with digraphs: Further qualifications to the generality of the regularity effect
on word naming. Journal of Memory and Language, 53, 567–593.
Baayen, R. H., Piepenbrock, R., & Gulikers, L. (1995). The CELEX Lexical Database
(Release 2) [CD-ROM]. Philadelphia: Linguistic Data Consortium, University of
Pennsylvania.
Balota, D. A., Cortese, M. J., & Pilotti, M. (1999). Item-level analysis of lexical decision:
Results from a mega-study. In Abstracts of the 40th Annual Meeting of the
Psychonomics Society (p. 44). Los Angeles, CA: Psychonomic Society.
Balota, D. A., Cortese, M. J., Sergent-Marshall, S. D., Spieler, D. H., & Yap, M. J.
(2004). Visual word recognition of single-syllable words. Journal of Experimental
Psychology: General, 133, 283–316.
Balota, D. A., & Spieler, D. H. (1998). The utility of item-level analyses in model
evaluation: A reply to Seidenberg and Plaut. Psychological Science, 9, 238–240.
Besner, D. (1999). Basic processes in reading: Multiple routines in localist and
connectionist models. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Besner, D., & Borowsky, R. (2006). Postscript: Plaut and Booth’s (2006) new simulations
— What have we learned? Psychological Review, 113, 194–195.
Besner, D., Twilley, L., McCann, R. S., & Seergobin, K. (1990). On the association
between connectionism and data: Are a few words necessary? Psychological Review,
97, 432–446.
Coltheart, M., Curtis, B., Atkins, P., & Haller, M. (1993). Models of reading aloud:
Dual-route and parallel-distributed-processing approaches. Psychological Review,
100, 589–608.
Coltheart, M., Davelaar, E., Jonasson, J. T., & Besner, D. (1977). Access to the internal
lexicon. In S. Dorniˇc (Ed.), Attention and performance VI (pp. 535–555). Hillsdale,
NJ: Erlbaum.
Coltheart, M., & Rastle, K. (1994). Serial processing in reading aloud: Evidence for
dual-route models of reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human
Perception and Performance, 20, 1197–1211.
Coltheart, M., Rastle, K., Perry, C., Langdon, R., & Ziegler, J. (2001). DRC: A dual
route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological
Review, 108, 204–256.
Cutler, A. (1981). Making up materials is a confounded nuisance, or: Will we be able to
run any psycholinguistic experiments at all in 1990? Cognition, 10, 65–70.
Frost, R., Kugler, T., Deutsch, A., & Forster, K. I. (2006). Orthographic structure versus
morphological structure: Principles of lexical organization in a given language.
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31,
1293–1326.
Glushko, R. J. (1979). The organization and activation of orthographic knowledge in
reading aloud. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and
Performance, 5, 674–691.
Gordon, B., & Caramazza, A. (1985). Lexical access and frequency sensitivity: Frequency
saturation and open/closed class equivalence. Cognition, 21, 95–115.
Grainger, J., & Jacobs, A. M. (1996). Orthographic processing in visual word recognition:
A multiple read-out model. Psychological Review, 103, 518–565.
Harm, M. W., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1999). Phonology, reading acquisition, and dyslexia:
Insights from connectionist models. Psychological Review, 106, 491–528.
Heathcote, A., Brown, S., & Mewhort, D. J. K. (2002). The power law repealed: The case
for an exponential law of practice. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 7, 185–207.
Jared, D. (1997). Spelling-sound consistency affects the naming of high frequency words.
Journal of Memory and Language, 36, 505–529.
Jared, D. (2002). Spelling-sound consistency and regularity effects in word naming.
Journal of Memory and Language, 46, 723–750.
Kwantes, P., & Mewhort, D. J. (1999). Modeling lexical decision and word naming as a
retrieval process. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 53, 306–315.
McClelland, J. L. (1979). On the time relations of mental processes: An examination of
systems of processes in cascade. Psychological Review, 86, 287–330.
McClelland, J. L., & Rumelhart, D. E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context
effects in letter perception: Part 1. An account of basic findings. Psychological
Review, 88, 375–407.
McDonald, S. A., & Shillcock, R. C. (2001). Rethinking the word frequency effect: The
neglected role of distributional information in lexical processing. Language and
Speech, 44, 295–323.
Mulatti, C., Reynolds, M. G., & Besner, D. (2006). Neighborhood effects in reading
aloud: New findings and new challenges for computational models. Journal of
Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32, 799–810.
Norris, D. (1994). A quantitative multiple-levels model of reading aloud. Journal of
Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 1212–1232.
Norris, D., & Brown, G. (1986). Race models and analogy theories: A dead heat? Reply
to Seidenberg. Cognition, 20, 155-168.
Paap, K. R., McDonald, J. E., Schvaneveldt, R. W., & Noel, R. W. (1987). Frequency
and pronounceability in visually presented naming and lexical decision tasks. In
M. Coltheart (Ed.), Attention and performance XII: The psychology of reading (pp.
221–243). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Peereman, R., & Content, A. (1995). Neighborhood size effect in naming: Lexical
activation or sublexical correspondences? Journal of Experimental Psychology:
Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 409–421.
Peereman, R., & Content, A. (1997). Orthographic and phonological neighborhoods in
naming: Not all neighbors are equally influential in orthographic space. Journal of
Memory and Language, 37, 382–410.
Perry, C., Ziegler, J. C., & Zorzi, M. (2007). Nested incremental modeling in the
development of computational theories: The CDP+ model of reading aloud.
Psychological Review, 114, 273–315.
Plaut, D. C., McClelland, J. L., Seidenberg, M. S., & Patterson, K. (1996).
Understanding normal and impaired reading: Computational principles in
quasi-regular domains. Psychological Review, 103, 56–115.
Rastle, K., & Coltheart, M. (1998). Whammies and double whammies: The effect of
length on nonword reading. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 5, 277–282.
Rastle, K., & Coltheart, M. (1999). Serial and strategic effects in reading aloud. Journal
of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 482–503.
Rastle, K., & Coltheart, M. (2000). Serial processing in reading aloud: Reply to Zorzi
(2000). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance,
26, 1232–1235.
Reynolds, M., & Besner, D. (2002). Neighbourhood density effects in reading aloud: New
insights from simulations with the DRC model. Canadian Journal of Experimental
Psychology, 56, 310–318.
Reynolds, M., & Besner, D. (2004). Neighbourhood density, word frequency, and
spelling-sound regularity effects in naming: Similarities and differences between
skilled readers and the dual route cascaded computational model. Canadian Journal
of Experimental Psychology, 58, 13–31.
Roberts, M. A., Rastle, K., Coltheart, M., & Besner, D. (2003). When parallel processing
in visual word processing is not enough: New evidence from naming. Psychonomic
Bulletin & Review, 10, 405–414.
Rumelhart, D. E., & Siple, P. (1974). The process of recognizing tachistoscopically
presented words. Psychological Review, 81, 99–118.
Sears, C. R., Campbell, C. R., & Lupker, S. J. (2006). Is there a neighborhood frequency
effect in english? evidence from reading and lexical decision. Journal of
Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32, 1040–1062.
Seidenberg, M. S. (1985). The time course of phonological code activation in two writing
systems. Cognition, 19, 1–30.
Seidenberg, M. S. (1986). Constraining models of word recognition. Cognition, 20, 69–190.
Seidenberg, M. S., & McClelland, J. L. (1989). A distributed, developmental model of
word recognition and naming. Psychological Review, 96, 523–568.
Seidenberg, M. S., Waters, G. S., Barnes, M. A., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (1984). When does
irregular spelling or pronunciation influence word recognition. Journal of Verbal
Learning and Verbal Behavior, 23, 383–404.
Siakaluk, P. D., Sears, C. R., & Lupker, S. J. (2002). Orthographic neighborhood effects
in lexical decision: The effects of nonword orthographic neighborhood size. Journal
of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28, 661–681.
Spieler, D. H., & Balota, D. A. (1997). Bringing computational models of word naming
down to the item level. Psychological Science, 8, 411–416.
Sternberg, S. (1969). The discovery of processing stages: Extensions of Donders’ method.
Acta Psychologica, 30, 276–315.
Taraban, R., & McClelland, J. L. (1987). Conspiracy effects in word pronunciation.
Journal of Memory and Language, 26, 608–631.
Weekes, B. S. (1997). Differential effects of number of letters on word and nonword
naming latency. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 50A, 439–456.
Zevin, J. D., & Seidenberg, M. S. (2006). Simulating consistency effects and individual
differences in nonword naming: A comparison of current models. Journal of Memory
and Language, 54, 145–160.
Ziegler, J., Perry, C., Jacobs, A., & Braun, M. (2001). Identical words are read differently
in different languages. Psychological Science, 12, 379–384.
Zorzi, M. (2000). Serial processing in reading aloud: No challenge for a parallel model.
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26,
847–856.