Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Statistics
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login

Excitonic Aharonov-Bohm effect in a two-dimensional quantum ring

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

González-Santander, C., Domínguez-Adame, F. and Roemer, Rudolf A.. (2011) Excitonic Aharonov-Bohm effect in a two-dimensional quantum ring. Physical Review B (Condensed Matter and Materials Physics), Vol.84 (No.23). 235103 . ISSN 1098-0121

[img]
Preview
PDF
WRAP_Roemer_1105.1262v3.pdf - Submitted Version - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader

Download (1878Kb)
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.84.235103

Abstract

We study theoretically the optical properties of an exciton in a two-dimensional ring threaded by a magnetic flux. We model the quantum ring by a confining potential that can be continuously tuned from strictly one-dimensional to truly two-dimensional with finite radius-to-width ratio. We present an analytic solution of the problem when the electron-hole interaction is short ranged. The oscillatory dependence of the oscillator strength as a function of the magnetic flux is attributed to the Aharonov-Bohm effect. The amplitude of the oscillations changes upon increasing the width of the quantum ring. We find that the Aharonov-Bohm oscillations of the ground state of the exciton decrease with increasing the width, but, remarkably, the amplitude remains finite down to radius-to-width ratios less than unity. We attribute this resilience of the excitonic oscillations to the nonsimple connectedness of our chosen confinement potential with its centrifugal core at the origin.

Item Type: Journal Article
Subjects: Q Science > QC Physics
Divisions: Faculty of Science > Physics
Faculty of Science > Centre for Scientific Computing
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): Exciton theory
Journal or Publication Title: Physical Review B (Condensed Matter and Materials Physics)
Publisher: American Physical Society
ISSN: 1098-0121
Date: 2011
Volume: Vol.84
Number: No.23
Number of Pages: 6
Page Range: 235103
Identification Number: 10.1103/PhysRevB.84.235103
Status: Peer Reviewed
Publication Status: Published
Access rights to Published version: Restricted or Subscription Access
Funder: Spain. Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación (MICINN)
Grant number: Mosaico (MICINN), MAT2010-17180 (MICINN)
References: 1 A. Lorke, R. J. Luyken , M. Fricke, J. P. Kotthaus, G. Medeiros-Ribeiro, J. M. Garcia, and P. M. Petroff, Microelectronic Engineering 47, 95 (1999). 2 A. Lorke, R. J. Luyken, A. O. Govorov, J. P. Kotthaus, J. M. Garcia, and P. M. Petroff, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 2223 (2000). 3 R. J.Warburton, C. Sch¨aflein, D. Haft, F. Bickel, A. Lorke, K. Karral, J. M. Garcia, W. Schoenfeld, and P. M. Petroff, Nature 405, 926 (2000). 4 E. Ribeiro, A. O. Govorov, W. Carvalho, and G. Medeiros- Ribeiro, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 126402 (2004). 5 M. D. Teodoro, V. L. Campo, V. Lopez-Richard, E. Marega, G. E. Marques, Y. G. a. Gobato, F. Iikawa, M. J. S. P. Brasil, Z. Y. AbuWaar, V. G. Dorogan, Y. I. Mazur, M. Benamara, and G. J. Salamo, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 086401 (2010). 6 M. Bayer, O. Stern, P. Hawrylak, S. Safard, and A. Forchel, Nature 405, 923 (2000). 7 M. Bayer, M. Korkusinski, P. Hawrylak, T. Gutbrod, M. Michel, and A. Forchel, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 186801 (2003). 8 F. Ding, N. Akopian, B. Li, U. Perinetti, A. Govorov, F. M. Peeters, C. C. Bof Bufon, C. Deneke, Y. H. Chen, A. Rastelli, O. G. Schmidt, and V. Zwiller, Phys. Rev. B 82, 075309 (2010). 9 W. Ehrenberg and R. E. Siday, Proc. Phys. Soc. Section B 62, 8 (1949). 10 Y. Aharonov and D. Bohm, Phys. Rev. 115, 485 (1959). 11 N. Byers and C. N. Yang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 7, 46 (1961). 12 T. Chakraborty and P. Pietil¨anen, Solid State Commun. 87, 809 (1993). 13 A. Chaplik, Pis’ma Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 62, 885 (1995), [JETP Lett. 62, 900–904 (1995)]. 14 R. A. R¨omer and M. E. Raikh, Phys. Rev. B 62, 7045 (2000). 15 I. Galbrath, F. Braid, and R. Warburton, phys. stat. sol. (a) 190, 781 (2002). 16 D. Haft, C. Schulhauser, A. Govorov, R. Warburton, K. Karrai, J. Garcia, W. Schoenfeld and P. Petroff, Physica E 13, 165 (2002). 17 A. Govorov, A. Kalameitsev, R.Warburton, K. Karrai and S. Ulloa, Physica E 13, 297 (2002). 18 K. Maschke, T. Meier, P. Thomas, and S. Koch, Eur. Phys. J. B 19, 599 (2001). 19 T. V. Shahbazyan, I. E. Perakis, and M. E. Raikh, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 5896 (2000). 20 A. M. Fischer, V. L. Campo, M. E. Portnoi, and R. A. R¨omer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 096405 (2009). 21 H. Hu, D.-J. Li, J.-L. Zhu, and J.-J. Xiong, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 12, 9145 (2001). 22 H. Hu, J. L. Zhu, D. J. Li, and J. Xiong, Phys. Rev. B 63, 195307 (2001). 23 A. O. Govorov, S. E. Ulloa, K. Karrai, and R. J. Warburton, Phys. Rev. B 66, 081309 (R) (2002). 24 L. G. G. V. Dias da Silva, S. E. Ulloa, and A. O. Govorov, Phys. Rev. B 70, 155318 (2004). 25 Z. Barticevic, M. Pacheco, J. Simonin, and C. R. Proetto, Phys. Rev. B 73, 165311 (2006). 26 J. Song and S. E. Ulloa, Phys. Rev. B 63, 125302 (2001). 27 M. Grochol, F. Grosse, and R. Zimmermann, Phys. Rev. B 74, 115416 (2006). 28 Z. Dai and J.-L. Zhu, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 19, 346202 (2007). 29 F. Palmero, J. Dorignac, J. C. Eilbeck, and R. A. R¨omer, Phys. Rev. B 72, 075343 (2005). 30 T. V. Bandos, A. Cantarero, and A. Garcia-Cristobal, Eur. Phys. J. B 53, 99 (2006). 31 B. Li and F. M. Peeters, Phys. Rev. B 83, 115448 (2011). 32 E. N. Bogachek and I. O. Kulik, Fiz. Nizk. Temp 9, 398 (1983) [Sov. J. Low Temp. Phys. 9, 202 (1983)]. E. N. Bogachek and Uzi Landman, Phys. Rev. B 52, 14067 (1995). W.-C. Tan and J. C. Inkson, Semiconductor Science and Technology 11, 1635 (1996). 33 V. M. Kovalev and A. V. Chaplik, Pis’ma Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 90, 753 (2009) [JETP Lett. 90, 679 (2009)]. 34 The vector potential is defined as usual such that H A·dr = h/e. 35 E. Lieb and W. Liniger, Phys. Rev. 130, 1605 (1963). 36 A. V. Maslov and D. S. Citrin, Phys. Rev. B 67, 121304 (2003). 37 T. Meier, P. Thomas, and S. Koch, Eur. Phys. J. B 22, 249 (2001). 38 P. Hui and Z. Jia-Lin, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 15, 7287 (2003).
URI: http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/40115

Request changes to a record

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Document Downloads

More statistics for this item...
twitter

Email us: publications@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us