Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Statistics
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login

Non-contact ultrasonic characterisation of angled surface defects

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Edwards, R. S. (Rachel S.), Dutton, B. (Ben), Rosli, M. H. and Clough, A. R. (2011) Non-contact ultrasonic characterisation of angled surface defects. In: Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation, San Diego, California, 18–23 July 2010. Published in: AIP Conference Proceedings, Vol.1335 (No.1). pp. 257-264.

[img]
Preview
Text
02WRAP_Edwards_71116-px-101012-f0930a_r.edwards_2010.pdf - Accepted Version

Download (615Kb) | Preview
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.3591864

Abstract

Surface ultrasonic waves have been shown to have many uses in non-destructive testing, in particular for gauging the depth of surface defects. Much of the previous work has assumed that these defects are oriented normal to the surface. However, this is not always the case; for example, rolling contact fatigue in rails propagates at an angle of around 25° to the surface, and this angle may affect the characterisation. We present results using non-contact ultrasonic methods to generate and detect ultrasound on samples with a range of defect angles, and compare these with finite element method (FEM) models. We use both electromagnetic acoustic transducers (EMATs) and laser ultrasound. The depth calibration when measuring ultrasound transmission is considered, and what affect the angle of a defect has. Several other methods of characterising crack depth and angle are also discussed, including the arrival times of reflected and mode-converted waves, the delay in the transmission of the high-frequency Rayleigh wave, and the enhancement of the signal at the defect in both the in-plane and out-of-plane components.

Item Type: Conference Item (Paper)
Subjects: Q Science > QC Physics
T Technology > TA Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General)
Divisions: Faculty of Science > Physics
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): Ultrasonic testing, Finite element method, Laser beams, Nondestructive testing, Surfaces (Technology) -- Defects, Rayleigh waves
Journal or Publication Title: AIP Conference Proceedings
Publisher: American Institute of Physics
ISSN: 0094-243X
Date: 23 June 2011
Volume: Vol.1335
Number: No.1
Page Range: pp. 257-264
Identification Number: 10.1063/1.3591864
Status: Peer Reviewed
Publication Status: Published
Funder: European Research Council (ERC)
Grant number: 202735 (ERC)
Conference Paper Type: Paper
Title of Event: Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation
Type of Event: Conference
Location of Event: San Diego, California
Date(s) of Event: 18–23 July 2010
References: 1. Edwards, R.S., S. Dixon, and X. Jian, Ultrasonics 44 (1) 93 (2006) 2. I.A. Viktorov. “Rayleigh and Lamb waves: physical theory and applications.” Plenum Press 1967 3. Edwards, R.S., Dixon S., and Jian X., NDT & E International 39 (6) 468 (2006) 4. Edwards, R.S., Jian X. and Dixon S.., Applied Physics Letters 87 (19) 3 (2005) 5. C.B. Scruby, L.E. Drain. “Laser ultrasonics: techniques and applications.” Adam Hilger, 1990 6. Dixon S., Cann B., Carroll D.L., Fan Y. and Edwards R.S., Nondestructive Testing and Evaluation 23 (1) 25 (2008) 7. Kromine A.K., Fomitchov P.A., Krishnaswamy S. and Achenbach J.D., Materials Evaluation 58 (2) 173 (2000) 8. Arias I. and Achenbach J.D., Wave Motion 39 (1) 61 (2004) 9. Kinra V.K. and Vu B.Q., Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 79 (6) 1688 (1986) 10. Babich V.M., Borovikov V.A., Fradkin L.J., Kamotski V. and Samok-ish B.A., NDT & E International 37 (2) 105 (2004) 11. Fujii K., Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 84 (6) 1916 (1994) 12. DuttonB., Rosli M.H. and Edwards R.S., Review of Progress in QNDE 29 647 (2010) 13. Klien M., Bacher G., Grunnet-Jepson A., Wright D. and Moerner W., Optics communications 162 79 – 84 (1999) 14. Dutton B., Clough A.R., Rosli M.H. and Edwards R.S., under review 15. Clough A.R., Dutton B. and Edwards R.S., these proceedings 16. Frost H.M., Physical Acoustics 14 179 (1979) 17. Edwards R.S., Dixon S., Fan Y. and Jian X., Review of Progress in QNDE 27 841 (2007) 18. Rosli M.H., Edwards R.S., Dutton B., Johnson C.G. and Cattani P., Review of Progress in QNDE 29 1593 (2010)
URI: http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/40124

Request changes to a record

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Document Downloads

More statistics for this item...
twitter

Email us: publications@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us