Kryukov, Eugeny V., Pike, Kevin J., Tam, Thomas K. Y., Newton, Mark E., Smith, Mark E. and Dupree, Ray. (2011) Determination of the temperature dependence of the dynamic nuclear polarisation enhancement of water protons at 3.4 Tesla. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, Vol.13 (No.10). pp. 4372-4380. ISSN 1463-9076

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

It is shown that the temperature dependence of the DNP enhancement of the NMR signal from water protons at 3.4 T using TEMPOL as a polarising agent can be obtained provided that the nuclear relaxation, T1I, is sufficiently fast and the resolution sufficient to measure the 1H NMR shift. For high radical concentrations (100 mM) the leakage factor is approximately 1 and, provided sufficient microwave power is available, the saturation factor is also approximately 1. In this situation the DNP enhancement is solely a product of the ratio of the electron and nuclear gyromagnetic ratios and the coupling factor enabling the latter to be directly determined. Although the use of high microwave power levels needed to ensure saturation causes rapid heating of the sample, this does not prevent maximum DNP enhancements, ε0, being obtained since T1I is very much less than the characteristic heating time at these concentrations. It is necessary, however, to know the temperature variation of T1I to allow accurate modelling of the behaviour. The DNP enhancement is found to vary linearly with temperature with ε0(T) = −2 ± 2 − (1.35 ± 0.02)T for 6 °C ≤ T ≤ 100 °C. The value determined for the coupling factor, 0.055 ± 0.003 at 25 °C, agrees very well with the molecular dynamics simulations of Sezer et al. (Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2009, 11, 6626) who calculated 0.0534, however the experimental values increase much more rapidly with increasing temperature than predicted by these simulations. Large DNP enhancements (|ε0| > 100) are reported at high temperatures but it is also shown that significant enhancements (e.g. 40) can be achieved whilst maintaining the sample temperature at 40 °C by adjusting the microwave power and irradiation time. In addition, short polarisation times enable rapid data acquisition which permits further enhancement of the signal, such that useful liquid state DNP-NMR experiments could be carried out on very small samples.

Item Type:	Journal Article
Subjects:	Q Science > QC Physics
Divisions:	Administration > Vice Chancellor's Office Faculty of Science > Physics
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH):	Nuclear magnetic resonance, Nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy, Polarization (Nuclear physics), Protons
Journal or Publication Title:	Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics
Publisher:	Royal Society of Chemistry
ISSN:	1463-9076
Date:	January 2011
Volume:	Vol.13
Number:	No.10
Page Range:	pp. 4372-4380
Identification Number:	10.1039/c0cp02188a
Status:	Peer Reviewed
Publication Status:	Published
Access rights to Published version:	Restricted or Subscription Access
Funder:	Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC)
Grant number:	EP/D045967 (EPSRC)
References:	1 A. W. Overhauser, Phys. Rev., 1953, 92, 411–415. 2 T. R. Carver and C. P. Slichter, Phys. Rev., 1956, 102, 975–981. 3 K. H. Hausser and D. Stehlik, Adv. Magn. Reson., 1968, 3, 79–139. 4 M. T. Turke, I. Tkach, M. Reese, P. Hofer and M. Bennati, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2010, 12, 5893–5901. 5 J. A. Villanueva-Garibay, G. Annino, P. J. M. van Bentum and A. P. M. Kentgens, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2010, 12, 5846–5849. 6 E. V. Kryukov, M. E. Newton, K. J. Pike, D. R. Bolton, R. M. Kowalczyk, A. P. Howes, M. E. Smith and R. Dupree, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2010, 12, 5757–5765. 7 R. D. Bates and W. S. Drozdoski, J. Chem. Phys., 1977, 67, 4038–4044. 8 D. Sezer, M. J. Prandolini and T. F. Prisner, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2009, 11, 6626–6637. 9 P. A. S. Cruickshank, D. R. Bolton, D. A. Robertson, R. I. Hunter, R. J. Wylde and G. M. Smith, Rev. Sci. Instrum., 2009, 80, 15. 10 T. Maly, G. T. Debelouchina, V. S. Bajaj, K. N. Hu, C. G. Joo, M. L. Mak-Jurkauskas, J. R. Sirigiri, P. C. A. van der Wel, J. Herzfeld, R. J. Temkin and R. G. Griffin, J. Chem. Phys., 2008, 128, 19. 11 Y. Matsuki, H. Takahashi, K. Ueda, T. Idehara, I. Ogawa, M. Toda, H. Akutsu and T. Fujiwara, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2010, 12, 5799–5803. 12 V. Denysenkov, M. J. Prandolini, M. Gafurov, D. Sezer, B. Endeward and T. F. Prisner, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2010, 12, 5786–5790. 13 M. J. Prandolini, V. P. Denysenkov, M. Gafurov, B. Endeward and T. F. Prisner, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2009, 131, 6090–6092. 14 C. Ysacco, E. Rizzato, M. A. Virolleaud, H. Karoui, A. Rockenbauer, F. Le Moigne, D. Siri, O. Ouari, R. G. Griffin and P. Tordo, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2010, 12, 5841–5845. 15 A. Krahn, P. Lottmann, T. Marquardsen, A. Tavernier, M. T. Turke, M. Reese, A. Leonov, M. Bennati, P. Hoefer, F. Engelke and C. Griesinger, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2010, 12, 5830–5840. 16 J. H. Ardenkjaer-Larsen, B. Fridlund, A. Gram, G. Hansson, L. Hansson, M. H. Lerche, R. Servin, M. Thaning and K. Golman, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 2003, 100, 10158–10163. 17 J. Leggett, R. Hunter, J. Granwehr, R. Panek, A. J. Perez-Linde, A. J. Horsewill, J. McMaster, G. Smith and W. Kockenberger, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2010, 12, 5883–5892. 18 M. Bennati, C. Luchinat, G. Parigi and M. T. Turke, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2010, 12, 5902–5910. 19 Q. N. Teng, Structural biology: practical NMR applications, Springer, New York, London, 2005. 20 T. Wu, K. R. Kendell, J. P. Felmlee, B. D. Lewis and R. L. Ehman, Med. Phys., 2000, 27, 221–224. 21 M. J. Prandolini, V. P. Denysenkov, M. Gafurov, S. Lyubenova, B. Endeward, M. Bennati and T. F. Prisner, Appl. Magn. Reson., 2008, 34, 399–407. 22 K. Krynicki, Physica, 1966, 32, 167–178. 23 D. Sezer, M. Gafurov, M. J. Prandolini, V. P. Denysenkov and T. F. Prisner, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2009, 11, 6638–6653.
URI:	http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/40138

Data sourced from Thomson Reuters' Web of Knowledge

Request changes to a record

Actions (login required)

View Item