Burton, Elizabeth J., Mitchell, Lynne and Stride, Chris. (2011) Good places for ageing in place : development of objective built environment measures for investigating links with older people's wellbeing. BMC Public Health, Vol.11 (No.1). p. 839. ISSN 1471-2458

Preview

PDF WRAP_Burton_1471-2458-11-839.pdf - Published Version - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader Download (302Kb)

Abstract

Background: There is renewed interest in the role of the built environment in public health. Relatively little research to date investigates its impact on healthy ageing. Ageing in place has been adopted as a key strategy for coping with the challenges of longevity. What is needed is a better understanding of how individual characteristics of older people’s residential environments (from front door to wider neighbourhood) contribute to their wellbeing, in order to provide the basis for evidence-based housing/urban design and development of interventions. This research aimed to develop a tool to objectively measure a large range of built environment characteristics, as the basis for a preliminary study of potential relationships with a number of ‘place-related’ functional, emotional and social wellbeing constructs. Methods: Through a review of urban design literature, design documents, and existing measures, a new tool, the NeDeCC (Neighbourhood Design Characteristics Checklist) was developed. It was piloted, refined, and its reliability validated through inter-rater tests. A range of place-related wellbeing constructs were identified and measured through interviews with 200 older people living in a wide variety of rural-urban environments and different types of housing in England. The NeDeCC was used to measure the residential environment of each participant, and significant bivariate relationships with wellbeing variables were identified. Results: The NeDeCC was found to have convincing face and construct validity and good inter-rater and test/ retest reliability, though it would benefit from use of digital data sources such as Google Earth to eliminate the need for on-site survey. The significant relationships found in the study suggest that there may be characteristics of residential environments of potential relevance for older people’s lives that have been overlooked in research to date, and that it may be worthwhile to question some of the assumptions about where and how older people want to live (e.g. villages seem to be positive). They also point to the importance of considering non-linear relationships. Conclusions: The NeDeCC provides the basis for generation of evidence-based design guidance if it is used in prospective controlled studies or ‘natural experiments’ in the future. Ultimately, this will facilitate the creation of better places for ageing in place.

Item Type:	Journal Article
Subjects:	H Social Sciences > HT Communities. Classes. Races R Medicine > RA Public aspects of medicine
Divisions:	Faculty of Science > Engineering Faculty of Social Sciences > School of Health and Social Studies
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH):	Older people -- Housing -- Great Britain, Older people -- Health and hygiene -- Great Britain, Housing and health -- Great Britain, City planning -- Great Britain
Journal or Publication Title:	BMC Public Health
Publisher:	BioMed Central Ltd.
ISSN:	1471-2458
Date:	1 November 2011
Volume:	Vol.11
Number:	No.1
Page Range:	p. 839
Identification Number:	10.1186/1471-2458-11-839
Status:	Peer Reviewed
Publication Status:	Published
Access rights to Published version:	Open Access
Funder:	Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC)
Grant number:	GR/S29102/01 (EPSRC)
References:	1. Pilkington P, Grant M, Orme J: Promoting integration of the health and built environment agendas through a workforce development initiative. Public Health 2008, 122:545-551. 2. Stewart J: A review of UK housing policy: ideology and public health. Public Health 2005, 119:525-534. 3. Frumkin H: Healthy places: exploring the evidence. American Journal of Public Health 2003, 93(9):1451-1456. 4. Srinivasan S, O’Fallon L, Dearry A: Creating healthy communities, healthy homes, healthy people: initiating a research agenda on the built environment and public health. American Journal of Public Health 2003, 93:1446-1450. 5. Jackson LE: The relationship of urban design to human health and condition. Landscape and Urban Planning 2003, 64(4):191-200. 6. Townshend T, Lake A: Obesogenic urban form: theory, policy and practice. Health and Place 2009, 15:909-916. 7. Sugiyama T, Francis J, Middleton N, Owen N, Giles-Corti B: Associations between recreational walking and attractiveness, size and proximity of neighbourhood open spaces. American Journal of Public Health 2010, 100(9):1752-1757. 8. Gehring U, Heinrich J, Kramer U, et al: Long-term exposure to ambient air pollution and cardiopulmonary mortality in women. Epidemiology 2006, 17:545-551. 9. Miller KA, Siscovick DS, Sheppard L, et al: Long-term exposure to air pollution and incidence of cardiovascular events in women. N Engl J Med 2007, 356:447-458. 10. Clark C, Myron R, Stansfield S, Candy B: A systematic review of the evidence on the effect of the built and physical environment on mental health. Journal of Public Mental Health 2007, 6(2):14-27. 11. Howden-Chapman P, Matheson A, Crane J, et al: Effect of insulating existing houses on health inequality: cluster randomised study in the community. BMJ 2007, 334:460. 12. Masotti PJ, Flick R, Johnson-Masotti A, MacLeod S: Healthy naturally occurring retirement communities: a low-cost approach to facilitating healthy aging. American Journal of Public Health 2006, 96(7):1164-1170. 13. Kane R: Making aging a public health priority. American Journal of Public Health 1994, 84(8):1213-1214. 14. Clarke P, Nieuvenhuijsen R: Environments for healthy ageing: a critical review. Maturitas 2009, 64:14-19. 15. DCLG (Department of Communities and Local Government): Lifetime Homes, Lifetime Neighbourhoods: A National Strategy for Housing in an Ageing Society London: DCLG; 2008. 16. Liu C-W, Everingham J-A, Warburton J, Cuthill M, Bartlett H: What makes a community age-friendly: a review of international literature. Australasian Journal on Ageing 2009, 28(3):116-121. 17. Gilroy R: Places that support human flourishing: lessons from later life. Planning Theory and Practice 2008, 9:145-163. 18. DCLG (Department of Communities and Local Government): Building a Society for all Ages London: DCLG; 2008. 19. Green R: Not compact cities but sustainable regions. In The Compact City: A Sustainable Urban Form?. Edited by: Jenks M, Burton E, Williams K. London: Spon Press; 1996:56-78. 20. Appleton N: The Needs and Aspirations of Older People Living in General Housing York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation; 2002. 21. Godfrey M, Townsend J, Denby T: Building a Good Life for Older People in Local Communities York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation; 2004. 22. Franco OH, Karnik K, Osborne G, Ordovas JM, Catt M, Van der Ouderaa F: Changing course in ageing research: the healthy ageing phenotype. Maturitas 2009, 93(1):13-19. 23. Feng J, Glass T, Curriero F, Stewart W, Schwartz B: The built environment and obesity: a systematic review of the epidemiologic evidence. Health and Place 2010, 16:175-190. 24. Kim D: Blues from the neighborhood? Neighborhood characteristics and depression. Epidemiologic Reviews 2008, 30:101-117. 25. Yen IH, Michael YL, Perdue L: Neighborhood environment in studies of health of older adults. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 2009, 37(5):455-463. 26. Mair C, Diez Roux AV, Galea S: Are neighbourhood characteristics associated with depressive symptoms? A review of evidence. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 2008, 62:940-946. 27. Dunton GF, Kaplan J, Wolch J, Jerrett M, Reynolds KD: Physical environment correlates of childhood obesity: a systematic review. International Association for the Study of Obesity 2009, 10:393-402. 28. Purciel M, Neckerman KM, Lovasi GS, Quinn JW, Weiss C, Bader MDM, Ewing R, Rundle A: Creating and validating GIS measures of urban design for health research. Journal of Environmental Psychology 2009, 29:457-466. 29. Kerr J, Norman GJ, Adams MA, Ryan S, Frank L, Sallis JF, Calfas KJ, Patrick K: Do neighbourhood environments moderate the effect of physical activity lifestyle interventions in adults? Health and Place 2010, 16:903-908. 30. Purciel M, Neckerman KM, Lovasi GS, Quinn JW, Weiss C, Bader MDM, Ewing R, Rundle A: Creating and validating GIS measures of urban design for health research. Journal of Environmental Psychology 2009, 29:457-466. 31. Lin L, Vernez Moudon A: Objective versus subjective measures of the built environment, which are most effective in capturing associations with walking? Health and Place 2010, 16:339-348. 32. Frank LD, Kerr J, Sallis JF, Miles R, Chapman J: A hierarchy of sociodemographic and and environmental correlates of walking and obesity. Preventive Medicine 2008, 47(2):172-178. 33. Dunstan F, Weaver N, Araya R, Bell T, Lannon S, Lewis G, Patterson J, Thomas H, Jones P, Palmer S: An observation tool to assist with the assessment of urban residential environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology 2005, 25:293-305. 34. Galea S, Ahern J, Rudenstine S, Wallace Z, Viahov D: Urban built environment and depression: a multilevel analysis. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 2005, 59:822-827. 35. Duarte CS, Chambers EC, Rundle A, Must A: Physical characteristics of the environment and BMI of young urban children and their mothers. Health and Place 2010, 16:1182-1187. 36. Spokane AR, Lombard JL, Martinez F, Mason CA, Gorman-Smith D, Plater- Zyberg E, Brown SC, Perrino T, Szapocznik J: Identifying streetscape features significant to well-being. Architectural Science Review 2007, 50(3):234-245. 37. Clarke P, Nieuvenhuijsen R: Environments for healthy ageing: a critical review. Maturitas 2009, 64:14-19. 38. Wood L, Frank LD, Giles-Corti B: Sense of community and its relationship with walking and neighbourhood design. Social Science and Medicine 2010, 70:1381-1390. 39. Feng J, Glass T, Curriero F, Stewart W, Schwartz B: The built environment and obesity: a systematic review of the epidemiologic evidence. Health and Place 2010, 16:175-190. 40. Song Y, Knaap G-J: Measuring urban form: is Portland winning the war on sprawl? Journal of the American Planning Association 2004, 70(2):210-225. 41. Nagel CL, Carlson NE, Bosworth M, Michael YL: The relation between neighbourhood built environment and walking activity among older adults. American Journal of Epidemiology 2008, 168(4):461-468. 42. Bentley R, Jolley D, Kavanagh AM: Local environments as determinants of walking in Australia. Social Science and Medicine 2010, 70:1806-1815. 43. Ewing R, Brownston RC, Berrigan D: Relationship between urban sprawl and weight of United States youth. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 2006, 31(6):464-474. 44. Gomez LF, Parra DC, Buchner D, Brownson RC, Sarmiento OL, Pinzon JD, Ardila M, Moreno J, Serrato M, Lobelo F: Built environment attributes and walking patterns among the elderly population in Bogota. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 2011, 38(6):592-599. 45. Dunstan F, Weaver N, Araya R, Bell T, Lannon S, Lewis G, Patterson J, Thomas H, Jones P, Palmer S: An observation tool to assist with the assessment of urban residential environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology 2005, 25:293-305. 46. Evans GW: The built environment and mental health. Journal of Urban Health 2003, 80(4):536-555. 47. Gomez SL, Glaser SL, McClure LA, Shema SJ, Kealey M, Keegan THM, Satariano WA: The California Neighborhoods Data System: a new resource for examining the impact of neighbourhood characteristics on cancer incidence and outcomes in populations. Cancer Causes Control 2011, 22:631-647. 48. Weich S, Blanchard M, Prince M, Burton E, Sproston K, Erens R: Mental health and the built environment: a cross-sectional survey of individual and contextual risk factors for depression. British Journal of Psychiatry 2002, 180:428-433. 49. Guite HF, Clarke C, Ackrill G: The impact of the physical and urban environment on mental wellbeing. Public Health 2006, 120:1117-1126. 50. Wood L, Shannon T, Bulsara M, Pikora T, McCormack G, Giles-Corti B: The anatomy of the safe and social suburb: an exploratory study of the built environment, social capital and residents’ perceptions of safety. Health and Place 2008, 14:15-31. 51. Purciel M, Neckerman KM, Lovasi GS, Quinn JW, Weiss C, Bader MDM, Ewing R, Rundle A: Creating and validating GIS measures of urban design for health research. Journal of Environmental Psychology 2009, 29:457-466. 52. Brown SC, Mason CA, Lombard JL, Martinez F, Plater-Zyberg E, Spokane AR, Newman FL, Pantin H, Szapocznik J: The relationship of built environment to perceived social support and psychological distress in Hispanic elders: the role of ‘eyes on the street’. Journal of Gerontology: Social Sciences 2009, 64B(2):234-246. 53. Burton E, Weich S, Blanchard M, Prince M: Measuring physical characteristics of housing: the Built Environment Site Survey Checklist (BESSC). Environment and Planning B 2005, 32(2):265-280. 54. DETR and CABE (Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions and Commission for Architecture and the Built Environment): By design. Urban design in the planning system: towards better practice London: The Stationery Office; 2000. 55. DfT (Department for Transport): Attitudes to streetscape and street uses London: The Stationery Office; 2005. 56. DfT (Department for Transport): Inclusive mobility - a guide to best practice on access to pedestrian and transport infrastructure London: The Stationery Office; 2002. 57. DTLR (Department of Transport, Local Government and the Regions): Better places to live by design: a companion guide to PPG3 London: The Stationery Office; 2001. 58. Llewelyn-Davies: Urban design compendium London: Llewelyn-Davies; 2000. 59. McCluskey J: Roadform and townscape Oxford: Architectural Press; 1992. 60. Southworth M, Owens P: The Evolving Metropolis: Studies of Community, Neighborhood, and Street Form at the Urban Edge. Journal of the American Planning Association 1993, 59(3):271-287. 61. Burton E, Mitchell L: Inclusive Urban Design: Streets for Life Oxford: Architectural Press; 2006. 62. Masotti PJ, Flick R, Johnson-Masotti A, MacLeod S: Healthy naturally occurring retirement communities: a low-cost approach to facilitating healthy aging. American Journal of Public Health 2006, 96(7):1164-1170. 63. O’Campo P, Salmon C, Burke J: Neighbourhoods and mental well-being: what are the pathways? Health and Place 2009, 15:56-68. 64. Kim D: Blues from the neighborhood? Neighborhood characteristics and depression. Epidemiologic Reviews 2008, 30:101-117. 65. Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS: Using Multivariate Statistics. 5 edition. Boston: Allyn and Bacon; 2007. 66. Clarke P, et al: Using Google Earth to conduct a neighbourhood audit: reliability of a virtual audit instrument. Health and Place 2010, 16:1224-1229. 67. Rundle AG, Bader MDM, Richards CA, Neckerman KM, Teitler JO: Using Google Street View to audit neighbourhood environments. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 2011, 40(1):94-100. 68. Hanlon P, Carlisle S, Hannah M, Reilly D, Lyon A: Making a case for the ‘fifth wave’ in public health. Public Health 2011, 125:30-36. 69. Layard R: Happiness: Lessons from a New Science London: Penguin; 2006. 70. Cooper R, et al: Mental capital and wellbeing: making the most of ourselves in the 21st century. State of Science Review: SR-DR2. The effect of the physical environment on mental wellbeing London: GO Science/Foresight; 2008. 71. Kendig H: Housing for life: views from older people., Paper presented to the 1999 ACT Adaptable and Accessible Housing conference, Canberra, Australia, 26 & 27 May. 72. Lawson B: Evidence-based design for healthcare business. Briefing: Hospital Engineering and Facilities Management 2005, 2:25-27.
URI:	http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/40180

Data sourced from Thomson Reuters' Web of Knowledge

Request changes to a record

Actions (login required)

View Item