Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Statistics
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login

Critical aesthetic theory : the aesthetic theories of the Frankfurt School

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Gaines, Jeremy (1985) Critical aesthetic theory : the aesthetic theories of the Frankfurt School. PhD thesis, University of Warwick.

[img]
Preview
PDF
WRAP_THESIS_Gaines_1985.pdf - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader

Download (28Mb)
Official URL: http://webcat.warwick.ac.uk/record=b1445904~S15

Abstract

The following study outlines the different aesthetic theories developed by Theodor. W. Adorno, Leo Löwenthal and Herbert Marcuse between 1931 and 1978, describing the work they undertook while members of the Frankfurt School (1931-1942) and relating this to their later writings. A brief explanation is also given of why - in the author's opinion - Walter Benjamin's work should not be included amongst that of the Frankfurt School. The thesis adopts a chronological approach based on immanent, textual analysis of primary source material including unpublished correspondence. The main point of comparison from which the different aesthetics are evaluated is the degree to which they accept the main social theory developed in the School by Max Horkheimer. It is argued that Horkheimer's work was in turn based on Friedrich Pollock's theory of state capitalism. One of the main arguments advanced here is that all the aesthetics constructed before and after 1942 were indeed influenced to a greater or lesser extent by Pollock's theory, an argument which challenges the dominant interpretations of Frankfurt School aesthetic theories which regard them as not being grounded in a theory of the base. The thesis shows that adopting Pollock's social theory created problems for the aesthetic theories and led to the emergence of two different aesthetics: Adorno's aesthetics of mimetic experience and Marcuse's political aesthetics. Löwenthal's essays are judged to form a literary sociology and not an aesthetics as such.. The dissertation concludes with the attempt to recuperate Adorno's concept of mimesis as the basis for a Marxist aesthetics.

Item Type: Thesis or Dissertation (PhD)
Subjects: B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BH Aesthetics
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): Aesthetics, Adorno, Theodor W., 1903-1969 -- Criticism and interpretation, Lowenthal, Leo -- Criticism and interpretation, Marcuse, Herbert, 1898-1979 -- Criticism and interpretation, Frankfurt school of sociology
Date: February 1985
Institution: University of Warwick
Theses Department: Department of German Studies
Thesis Type: PhD
Publication Status: Unpublished
Extent: 449 p.
Language: eng
URI: http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/4037

Request changes to a record

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Document Downloads

More statistics for this item...
twitter

Email us: publications@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us