Developing the evidence base of patient and public involvement in health and social care research : the case for measuring impact
Staniszewska, Sophie, Adebajo, Ade, Barber, Rosemary, Beresford, Peter, Brady, Louca-Mai, Brett, Jo, Elliott, J. (Jim), Evans, David, 1955-, Haywood, Kirstie L., Jones, D. (David), Mockford, Carole, Nettle, Mary, Rose, Diana and Williamson, Tracey, 1967-. (2011) Developing the evidence base of patient and public involvement in health and social care research : the case for measuring impact. International Journal of Consumer Studies, Volume 35 (Number 6). pp. 628-632. ISSN 14706423Full text not available from this repository.
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1470-6431.2011.01020.x
While patient and public involvement (PPI) in health and social care research has progressed successfully in the last decade, a range of difficulties with the evidence base exist, including poor understanding of the concept of impact, limited theorization and an absence of quantitative impact measurement. In this paper, we argue that a paradigm change towards robust measurement of the impact of involvement in research is needed to complement qualitative explorations. We argue that service users should be collaboratively involved in the conceptualization, theorization and development of instruments to measure PPI impact. We consider the key advantages measurement would bring in strengthening the PPI evidence base through a greater understanding of what works, for whom, in what circumstances and why.
|Item Type:||Journal Article|
|Subjects:||H Social Sciences > HV Social pathology. Social and public welfare
R Medicine > R Medicine (General)
R Medicine > RA Public aspects of medicine > RA0421 Public health. Hygiene. Preventive Medicine
|Divisions:||Faculty of Social Sciences > School of Health and Social Studies|
|Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH):||Patient participation, Public health, Medical policy -- Citizen participation, Health planning, Social service -- Research -- Great Britain -- Citizen participation, Medical care -- Research -- Great Britain -- Citizen participation|
|Journal or Publication Title:||International Journal of Consumer Studies|
|Publisher:||John Wiley & Sons Ltd.|
|Page Range:||pp. 628-632|
|Access rights to Published version:||Restricted or Subscription Access|
|References:||Barber, R., Boote, J., Parry, G., Cooper, C., Yeeles, P. & Cook, S. (2011) Can the impact of public involvement on research be evaluated? A mixed methods study. Health Expectations doi: 10.1111/ j.1369-7625.2010.00660.x (accessed on 26 February 2011). Beresford, P. (2007) The role of service user research in generating knowledge-based health and social care: from conflict to contribution. Evidence & Policy, 3, 329–341. Boote, J., Barber, R. & Cooper, C. (2006) Principles and indicators of successful consumer involvement in NHS research: results of a Delphi study and subgroup analysis. Health Policy, 75, 280–297. Brady, L.M., Davis, E., Ghosh, A., Surti, B. & Wilson, L. (2011) Involving young people in research: making an impact in public health. In Critical Perspectives on User Involvement (ed. by M. Barnes & P. Cotterrell). Policy Press, Bristol. Brett, J., Staniszewska, S., Mockford, C., Seers, K., Herron-Marx, S. & Bayliss, H. (2009) The PIRICOM Study: A Systematic Review of the Conceptualisation, Measurement, Impact and Outcomes of Patients and Public Involvement in Health and Social Care Research. United Kingdom Clinical Research Council, London. Craig, P., Dieppe, P., Macintyre, S., Michie, S., Nazareth, I. & Petticrew, M. (2008) Developing and Evaluating Complex Interventions: New Guidance. Medical Research Council, London. Crawford, M., Rutter, D. & Thelwall, S. (2002) User Involvement in Change Management: A Review of the Literature. NCCSDO, London. Farrell, C. (2010) Citizen and consumer involvement in UK public services. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 34, 503–507. Faulkner, A. (2010) Changing Our Worlds: Examples of User-controlled Research in Action. INVOLVE, Eastleigh. Fayers, P. & Machin, D. (2007) Quality of Life: The Assessment, Analysis and Interpretation of Patient-Reported Outcomes, 2nd edn. Wiley- Blackwell, Chichester, UK. Hanley, B., Bradburn, J., Barnes, M., Evans, C., Goodare, H., Kelson, M., Kent, A., Oliver, S., Thomas, C. & Wallcraft, J. (2004) Involving the Service User in NHS, Service User Health, and Social Care Research: Briefing Notes for Researchers. INVOLVE, Eastleigh. [WWW document]. URL http://www.invo.org.uk (accessed on 10 February 2011). Haywood, K.L., Garratt, A.M., Jordan, K.P., Healey, E.L. & Packham, J.C. (2010) Evaluation of ankylosing spondylitis quality of life (EASi- QoL): reliability and validity of a new patient-reported outcome measure. Journal of Rheumatology, 37, 2100–2109. Haywood, K.L., Staniszewska, S. & Chapman, S. (2011) Quality and acceptability of patient reported outcome measures used in Chronic Fatigue Syndrome/Myalgic Encephalomyelitis (CFS/ME): a structured review. Quality of Life Research (in press) Epub ahead of print. Hobart, J. & Cano, S. (2009) Improving the evaluation of therapeutic interventions in multiple sclerosis: the role of new psychometric methods. Health Technology Assessment, 13, iii, ix–x, 1–177. Mockford, C., Staniszewska, S., Griffiths, F., Herron-Marx, S. (2009) A systematic review of the impact of patient and public involvement on health and social services. National Centre for Involvement. Morrow, E., Ross, F., Grocott, P. & Bennett, J. (2010) A model and measure for quality service user involvement in health research. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 34, 532–539. National Institute of Health Research Website (2011) Patient and public awareness. [WWW document]. URL http://www.nihr.ac.uk/awareness/ Pages/default.aspx (accessed on 11 March 2011. Nunnally, J.C. & Bernstein, I.H. (1994) Psychometric Theory, 3rd edn. McGraw Hill, New York. Oliver, S., Clarke-Jones, L., Rees, R., Milne, R., Buchanan, P., Gabbay, J., Gyte, G., Oakley, A. & Stein, K. (2004) Involving consumers in Research and Development agenda setting for the NHS: developing an evidence-based approach. Health Technology Assessment Monographs, 8, 1–148. Pawson, R. & Tilley, N. (1997) Realistic Evaluation. Sage, London. Pear (2010) Young People in Research: How to Involve Us. National Children’s Bureau, London. Rose, D., Evans, J., Sweeney, A. & Wykes, T. (2011) A model for developing outcomes measures from the perspective of mental health service users. International Review of Psychiatry, 23, 41–46. Staley, K. (2009) Exploring Impact: Public Involvement in NHS, Public Health and Social Care Research. INVOLVE, Eastleigh. Staniszewska, S. (2009) Patient and public involvement in health services and health research: a brief overview of evidence, policy and activity. Journal of Research in Nursing, 14, 295–298. Staniszewska, S., Brett, J., Mockford, C. & Barber, R. (2011a) The GRIPP checklist: strengthening the quality of patient and public involvement reporting in research. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care (in press). Staniszewska, S., Herron-Marx, S. & Mockford, C. (2008) Measuring the impact of patient and public involvement: the need for an evidencebase. International Journal of Quality in Healthcare, 20, 373–374. Staniszewska, S., Mockford, C., Gibson, A., Herron-Marx, S. & Putz, B. (2011b) Moving forward: understanding the negative experiences and impacts of patient and public involvement in health service planning, development and evaluation. In Critical Perspectives on User Involvement (ed. by M. Barnes & P. Cotterrell). Policy Press, Bristol. Streiner, D. & Norman, G. (2008) Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use. Oxford University Press, Oxford. Telford, R., Boote, J. & Cooper, C. (2004) What does it mean to involve consumers successfully in NHS research? A consensus study. Health Expectations, 7, 209–220. United Nations (2006) Convention on the rights of persons with disabilities. http://www.un.org/disabilities/convention/conventionfull.shtml (accessed on 26 April 2011). Ware, L. & Sherbourne, C.D. (1992) The MOS 36-item Short Form-36 Health Survey (SF-36): conceptual framework and item selection. Medical Care, 30, 473–483. World Health Organisation (2006) Ninth Futures on Health Systems Governance and Public Participation. World Health Organisation, Copenhagen. Wright, D., Foster, C., Amir, Z., Elliott, J. & Wilson, R. (2011) Critical appraisal guidelines for assessing the quality and impact of user involvement in research. Health Expectations, 13, 359–368.|
Actions (login required)