Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Statistics
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login

Peptidomimetic bond formation by DNA-templated acyl transfer

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

McKee, Mireya L., Evans, Amanda C., Gerrard, Simon R., O'Reilly, Rachel K., Turberfield, Andrew J. and Stulz, Eugen. (2011) Peptidomimetic bond formation by DNA-templated acyl transfer. Organic & Biomolecular Chemistry, Vol.9 (No.5). pp. 1661-1666. ISSN 1477-0520

Full text not available from this repository.
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C0OB00753F

Abstract

The efficiencies of DNA-templated acyl transfer reactions between a thioester modified oligonucleotide and a series of amine and thiol based nucleophiles are directly compared. The reactivity of the nucleophile, reaction conditions (solvent, buffer, pH) and linker length all play important roles in determining the efficiency of the transfer reaction. Careful optimisation of the system enables the use of DNA-templated synthesis to form stable peptide-like bonds under mild aqueous conditions close to neutral pH.

Item Type: Journal Article
Subjects: Q Science > QD Chemistry
Q Science > QP Physiology
Divisions: Faculty of Science > Chemistry
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): Peptides, Biochemical templates, Acylation, Chemical bonds, Biosynthesis, Nucleophilic reactions
Journal or Publication Title: Organic & Biomolecular Chemistry
Publisher: Royal Society of Chemistry
ISSN: 1477-0520
Date: 2011
Volume: Vol.9
Number: No.5
Page Range: pp. 1661-1666
Identification Number: 10.1039/c0ob00753f
Status: Peer Reviewed
Publication Status: Published
Funder: Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC)
Grant number: EP/F056605/1 (EPSRC), EP/008597/1 (EPSRC)
References: 1 Y. Brudno and D. R. Liu, Chem. Biol., 2009, 16, 265–276. 2 L. J. Prins and P. Scrimin, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2009, 48, 2288–2306. 3 M. F. Jacobsen, J. B.Ravnsbaek and K.V. Gothelf, Org. Biomol.Chem., 2010, 8, 50–52. 4 K. Meguellati, G. Koripelly and S. Ladame, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2010, 49, 2738–2742. 5 Z. Gartner and D. Liu, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2001, 123, 6961–6963. 6 X. Li andD. Liu, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2004, 43, 4848–4870. 7 T. Grossmann, A. Strohbach and O. Seitz, ChemBioChem, 2008, 9, 2185–2192. 8 I. Boll, R. Kramer, J. Brunner andA.Mokhir, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2005, 127, 7849–7856. 9 D. Summerer and A. Marx, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2002, 41, 89–90. 10 M. Rozenman, B. McNaughton and D. Liu, Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol., 2007, 11, 259–268. 11 J. Scheuermann, C. Dumelin, S. Melkko and D. Neri, J. Biotechnol., 2006, 126, 568–581. 12 A. Silverman and E. Kool, Chem. Rev., 2006, 106, 3775–3789. 13 M. Hansen, P. Blakskjaer, L. Petersen, T. Hansen, J. Hjfeldt, K. Gothelf and N. Hansen, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2009, 131, 1322–1327. 14 Z. Gartner, M. Kanan and D. Liu, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2002, 124, 10304–10306. 15 T. Snyder and D. Liu, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2005, 44, 7379–7382. 16 P. Dawson, T. Muir, I. Clark-Lewis and S. Kent, Science, 1994, 266, 776–779. 17 T. Grossmann andO. Seitz, J. Am.Chem. Soc., 2006, 128, 15596–15597. 18 D. Stetsenko and M. Gait, J. Org. Chem., 2000, 65, 4900–4908. 19 D. Schwarzer, R. Finking and M. A. Marahiel, Nat. Prod. Rep., 2003, 20, 275–287. 20 C. E. Salomon, N. A. Magarvey and D. H. Sherman, Nat. Prod. Rep., 2004, 21, 105–121. 21 R. Bruick, P. Dawson, S. Kent, N. Usman and G. Joyce, Chem. Biol., 1996, 3, 49–56. 22 K. Wilcoxen, L. Leman, D. Weinberger, Z. Huang and M. Ghadiri, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2007, 129, 748–749. 23 Z. J. Gartner, R. Grubina, C. T. Calderone and D. R. Liu, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2003, 42, 1370–1375. 24 J. Kalia and R. Raines, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2008, 47, 7523–7526. 25 T. Zatsepin, D. Stetsenko, M. Gait and T. Oretskaya, Bioconjugate Chem., 2005, 16, 471–489. 26 The pKa values have been calculated using ACD/I-Lab service and were compared with literature values (given in brackets) for closest match: amine 10.7 (10.6; from H. K. Hall, Jr., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1957, 79, 5441–5444); benzylamine 8.8 (9.3; ibid.); aminooxy 3.4 (4.6; ibid.); hydrazide 2.9 (3.0; from; P. R. Campod´onico, M. E. Aliaga, J. G. Santos, E. A. Castro and R. Contreras, Chem. Phys. Lett., 2010, 488, 86–89); hydrazine 4.9 (5.2; from; J. B. Conant and P. D. Bartlett, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1932, 54, 2881–2889); hydrazino-nicotinate 1.6 (-0.5; from;M.Mure, D. E. Brown, C. Saysell,M. S.Rogers, C. M. Wilmot, C. R. Kurtis, M. J. McPherson, S. E. V. Phillips, P. F. Knowles and D. M. Dooley, Biochemistry, 2005, 44, 1568–1582). 27 S.Raddatz, J.Mueller-Ibeler, J.Kluge, L.W¨ass,G. Burdinski, J. Havens, T. Onofrey, D. Wang and M. Schweitzer, Nucleic Acids Res., 2002, 30, 4793–4802. 28 S. Antsypovich and G. von Kiedrowski, Nucleosides, Nucleotides Nucleic Acids, 2005, 24, 211–226. 29 T. Zatsepin, D. Stetsenko, M. Gait and T. Oretskaya, Nucleic Acids Symp. Ser., 2005, 133–134. 30 G. Grimm, A. Boutorine and C. H´el`ene, Nucleosides, Nucleotides Nucleic Acids, 2000, 19, 1943–1965. 31 B. Amit, U. Zehavi and A. Patchorn, J. Org. Chem., 1974, 39, 192–196. 32 A. Dirksen and P. Dawson, Bioconjugate Chem., 2008, 19, 2543–2548. 33 J. Vulterin and J. Z´yka, Talanta, 1963, 10, 891–898. 34 It should be noted that it was not our intention to optimise the yields of the acyl transfer reactions, but to directly compare the efficiency of the various nucleophiles under different conditions. Therefore, the yields stated do not reflect the maximum possible yields as the reactions were stopped and evaluated after a certain time, irrespective of whether they had gone to completion or not. 35 K. Broo, M. Allert, L. Andersson, P. Erlandsson, G. Stenhagen, J. Wigstrom, P. Ahlberg and L. Baltzer, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2, 1997, 397–398. 36 L. Leman, D. Weinberger, Z. Huang, K. Wilcoxen and M. Ghadiri, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2007, 129, 2959–2966. 37 K. Broo, L. Brive, P. Ahlberg and L. Baltzer, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1997, 119, 11362–11372. 38 L. Baltzer, K. Broo, H. Nilsson and J. Nilsson, Bioorg. Med. Chem., 1999, 7, 83–91. 39 N. Sakai, N. Sorde and S. Matile, Molecules, 2001, 6, 845–851. 40 Z. Gartner, R. Grubina, C. Calderone and D. Liu, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2003, 42, 1370–1375. 41 T. Grossmann, L. R¨ oglin and O. Seitz, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2008, 47, 7119–7122. 42 M. L. McKee, P. J. Milnes, J. Bath, E. Stulz, A. J. Turberfield and R. K. O’Reilly, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2010, 49, 7948–7951. 43 B. N. Tse, T. M. Snyder, Y. H. Shen and D. R. Liu, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2008, 130, 15611–15626. 44 R. E. Kleiner, C. E. Dumelin, G. C. Tiu, K. Sakurai and D. R. Liu, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2010, 132, 11779–11791.
URI: http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/40505

Data sourced from Thomson Reuters' Web of Knowledge

Request changes to a record

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item
twitter

Email us: publications@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us