Hiney, Rachel M., Chaplin, Adrian B., Harmer, Jeffrey, Green, Jennifer C. and Weller, Andrew S.. (2010) Using EPR to follow reversible dihydrogen addition to paramagnetic clusters of high hydride count : [Rh6(PCy3)6H12]+ and [Rh6(PCy3)6H14]+. Dalton Transactions, Vol.39 (No.7). pp. 1726-1733. ISSN 1477-9226

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

A combined structural/EPR/computational chemistry investigation is reported on the two paramagnetic hydrido-cluster salts [Rh(6)(PCy(3))(6)H(12)][BAr(4)(F)] and [Rh(6)(PCy(3))(6)H(14)][BAr(4)(F)], the latter being formed by reversible addition of H(2) to the former, [BAr(4)(F)](-) = [B{C(6)H(3)(CF(3))(2)}(4)](-). The solid-state structure of [Rh(6)(PCy(3))(6)H(14)][BAr(4)(F)] shows an expanded cluster core compared to previously reported [Rh(6)(PCy(3))(6)H(12)][ BAr(4)(F)] indicative of the addition of hydrogen to the cluster surface. This expansion correlates well with the calculated (PH(3) replaces PCy(3)) structures. EPR measurements on [Rh(6)(PCy(3))(6)H(12)][BAr(4)(F)] indicate two isomers at low temperature, which are tentatively assigned as diastereomers that result from locked phosphine rotation and bridging hydride/semi bridging hydride tautomerism. The EPR signal disappears above 60 K which is suggested to occur due to fast Raman-type relaxation-a phenomenon consistent with the calculated small SOMO/SOMO-1 and SOMO/LUMO gaps. For [Rh(6)(PCy(3))(6)H(14)][BAr(4)(F)] EPR measurements indicate two isomers, the proportion of which change with temperature and deuteration-one axial isomer and one rhombic isomer. DFT calculations on a number of plausible isomers give EPR parameters which fit the experimentally determined rhombic isomer to one in which there is an interstitial hydride in the cluster and thirteen hydride ligands on the surface, while the axial isomer has two dihydrogen-like ligands on the cluster surface. That these isomers lie close in energy comes from both the EPR measurements ( as measured from equilibrium constants over a variable temperature range) and DFT calculations. Deuteration of the hydrides should favour the isomer with the lowest zero-point energy and this is the case, with the axial isomer (two D(2) ligands on the surface) being favoured over the rhombic.

[error in script] [error in script]

Item Type:	Journal Article
Subjects:	Q Science > QC Physics
Divisions:	Faculty of Science > Chemistry
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH):	Electron paramagnetic resonance, Dihydrogen bonding, Addition reactions, Hydrides, Rhodium, Metal clusters
Journal or Publication Title:	Dalton Transactions
Publisher:	Royal Society of Chemistry
ISSN:	1477-9226
Date:	2010
Volume:	Vol.39
Number:	No.7
Page Range:	pp. 1726-1733
Identification Number:	10.1039/b919209c
Status:	Peer Reviewed
Publication Status:	Published
Access rights to Published version:	Restricted or Subscription Access
Funder:	University of Oxford. Oxford Supercomputing Centre, University of Oxford, Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC)
References:	1 We use the nomenclature exemplified by Cy-[H12]2+ to denote in a concise format the phosphine substitution pattern (i.e. PCy3), hydride count (i.e. 12) and charge on these cluster salts. Implicit is the presence of [BArF 4] counterions in the actual formula. 2 M. J. Ingleson, M. F. Mahon, P. R. Raithby and A. S. Weller, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2004, 126, 4784–4785. 3 S. K. Brayshaw, M. J. Ingleson, G. Kociok-Kohn, J. C. Green, J. S. McIndoe, P. R. Raithby and A. S.Weller, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2006, 128, 6247–6263. 4 Z. Y. Lin and M. F. Fan, in Structural and Electronic Paradigms in Cluster Chemistry, Structure and Bonding, 1997, vol. 87, 35–80. 5 Z. Y. Lin and I. D. Williams, Polyhedron, 1996, 15, 3277–3287. 6 S. K. Brayshaw, J. C. Green, N. Hazari and A. S.Weller, Dalton Trans., 2007, 1781–1792. 7 S. K. Brayshaw, A. Harrison, J. S. McIndoe, F.Marken, P. R. Raithby, J. E.Warren andA. S.Weller, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2007, 129, 1793–1804. 8 A. S. Weller and J. S. McIndoe, Eur. J. Inorg. Chem., 2007, 4411–4423. 9 R. D. Adams, B. Captain, C. Beddie andM.B.Hall, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2007, 129, 986–1000. 10 R. D. Adams, B. Captain and L. Zhu, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2007, 129, 2454–2455. 11 R. M. Hiney, F.Marken, P. R. Raithby and A. S.Weller, J. Organomet. Chem., 2009, 694, 2808–2813. 12 P. Lemoine, Coord. Chem. Rev., 1982, 47, 55–88. 13 W. E. Geiger and N. G. Connelly, Adv. Organomet. Chem., 1985, 24, 87–130. 14 P. Zanello, Struct. Bonding, 1992, 79, 101–214. 15 P. Zanello, Inorganic Electrochemistry, Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambridge, 2003. 16 G. Longoni, C. Femoni, M. C. Iapalucci and P. Zanello, in Metal Clusters in Chemistry, ed. P. Braunstein, L. A. Oro and P. R. Raithby, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 1999, vol. 2, p. 1137. 17 D. E. Freedman, D. M. Jenkins, A. T. Iavarone and J. R. Long, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2008, 130, 2884–2885. 18 E. J.Welch, N. R. M. Crawford, R. G. Bergman and J. R. Long, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2003, 125, 11464–11465. 19 E. J.Welch,C. L.Yu,N.R.M.Crawford and J. R. Long, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2005, 44, 2549–2553. 20 C. A. Goddard, J. R. Long and R. H. Holm, Inorg. Chem., 1996, 35, 4347–4354. 21 T. Saito, N. Yamamoto, T. Nagase, T. Tsuboi, K. Kobayashi, T. Yamagata, H. Imoto and K. Unoura, Inorg. Chem., 1990, 29, 764–770. 22 N. Prokopuk and D. F. Shriver, Adv. Inorg. Chem., 1998, 46, 1–49. 23 N. Prokopuk, V. O. Kennedy, C. L. Stern and D. F. Shriver, Inorg. Chem., 1998, 37, 5001–5006. 24 D. D. Klendworth and R. A. Walton, Inorg. Chem., 1981, 20, 1151– 1155. 25 H. Imoto, S. Hayakawa, N. Morita and T. Saito, Inorg. Chem., 1990, 29, 2007–2014. 26 J.D.Roth, G. J. Lewis, L. K. Safford, X. D. Jiang, L. F. Dahl andM. J. Weaver, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1992, 114, 6159–6169. 27 R. E. Benfield, J. Phys. Chem., 1987, 91, 2712–2716. 28 R. E. Benfield, P. P. Edwards and A. M. Stacy, J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun., 1982, 525–526. 29 M. P. Cifuentes, M. G. Humphrey, J. E. McGrady, P. J. Smith, R. Stranger, K. S. Murray and B. Moubaraki, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1997, 119, 2647–2655. 30 M. Costa,R. Della Pergola, A. Fumagalli, F. Laschi, S. Losi, P. Macchi, A. Sironi and P. Zanello, Inorg. Chem., 2007, 46, 552–560. 31 S. R. Drake, P. P. Edwards, B. F. G. Johnson, J. Lewis, E. A. Marseglia, S. D. Obertelli and N. C. Pyper, Chem. Phys. Lett., 1987, 139, 336–344. 32 D. C. Johnson, R. E. Benfield, P. P. Edwards,W. J. H. Nelson and M.D. Vargas, Nature, 1985, 314, 231–235. 33 E. G. Tulsky, N. R. M. Crawford, S. A. Baudron, P. Batail and J. R. Long, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2003, 125, 15543–15553. 34 M. Baya, P. A. Dub, J. Houghton, J. C. Daran, N. V. Belkova, E. S. Shubina, L.M. Epstein, A. Lledos and R. Poli, Inorg. Chem., 2009, 48, 209–220. 35 M. Baya, J. Houghton, J. C. Daran and R. Poli, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2007, 46, 429–432. 36 M. Baya, J. Houghton, J. C. Daran, R. Poli, L. Male, A. Albinati and M. Gutman, Chem.–Eur. J., 2007, 13, 5347–5359. 37 W. Henderson and J. S. McIndoe, Mass Spectrometry of Inorganic and Organometallic Compounds, John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, 2005. 38 S. Stoll and A. Schweiger, J. Magn. Reson., 2006, 178, 42–55. 39 M.Bergamo,T. Beringhelli,G. D’Alfonso,P.Mercandelli andA. Sironi, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2002, 124, 5117–5126. 40 J. Ito, T. Shima and H. Suzuki, Organometallics, 2004, 23, 2447–2460. 41 C. Elschenbroich, E. Bilger, J. Koch and J. Weber, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1984, 106, 4297–4299. 42 J. Cosier and A. M. Glazer, J. Appl. Crystallogr., 1986, 19, 105–107. 43 Z. Otwinowski andW.Minor, Methods Enzymol., 1997, 276, 307–326. 44 G. M. Sheldrick, Acta Crystallogr., Sect. A: Found. Crystallogr., 2008, 64, 112–122. 45 L. Farrugia, J. Appl. Crystallogr., 1997, 30, 565–565. 46 G. T. Velde, F. M. Bickelhaupt, E. J. Baerends, C. F. Guerra, S. J. A. V. Gisbergen, J. G. Snijders and T. Ziegler, J. Comput. Chem., 2001, 22, 931–967. 47 C. F. Guerra, J.G. Snijder,G. T. Velde and E. J. Baerends, Theor. Chem. Acc., 1998, 99, 391–403. 48 ADF2007.01 Theoretical Chemistry, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, SCM, http://www.scm.com. 49 ADF2008.01 Theoretical Chemistry, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, SCM, http://www.scm.com. 50 E. van Lenthe, E. J. Baerends and J. G. Snijders, J. Chem. Phys., 1993, 99, 4597–4610. 51 E. van Lenthe, E. J. Baerends and J. G. Snijders, J. Chem. Phys., 1994, 101, 9783–9792. 52 E. van Lenthe, E. J. Baerends and J. G. Snijders, J. Chem. Phys., 1996, 105, 6505–6516. 53 E. van Lenthe, R. VanLeeuwen, E. J. Baerends and J. G. Snijders, Int. J. Quantum Chem., 1996, 57, 281–293. 54 E. van Lenthe, A. Ehlers and E. J. Baerends, J. Chem. Phys., 1999, 110, 8943–8953. 55 S. H.Vosko, L.Wilk andM. Nusair, Can. J. Phys., 1980, 58, 1200–1211. 56 A. D. Becke, Phys. Rev. A, 1988, 38, 3098–3100. 57 A. D. Becke, J. Chem. Phys., 1988, 88, 1053–1062. 58 J. P. Perdew, Phys. Rev. B, 1986, 33, 8822–8824. 59 L. Fan and T. Ziegler, J. Chem. Phys., 1992, 96, 9005–9012. 60 L. Fan and T. Ziegler, J. Phys. Chem., 1992, 96, 6937–6941. 61 E. van Lenthe, A. Van Der Avoird and P. E. S.Wormer, J. Chem. Phys., 1997, 107, 2488–2498. 62 E. van Lenthe, A. Van Der Avoird and P. E. S.Wormer, J. Chem. Phys., 1998, 108, 4783–4796.
URI:	http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/40522

Data sourced from Thomson Reuters' Web of Knowledge

Request changes to a record

Actions (login required)

View Item