Wilson, Andrew D. and Bingham, Geoffrey P. . (2007) Identifying the information for the visual perception of relative phase. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, Vol.70 (No.3). pp. 465-476. ISSN 1943-3921

Preview

PDF WRAP_Wilson_Wilson__Bingham_2008_Manuscript.pdf - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader Download (258Kb)

Abstract

The production and perception of coordinated rhythmic movement are very specifically structured. For production and perception, 0° mean relative phase is stable, 180° is less stable, and no other state is stable without training. It has been hypothesized that perceptual stability characteristics underpin the movement stability characteristics, which has led to the development of a phase-driven oscillator model (e.g., Bingham, 2004a, 2004b). In the present study, a novel perturbation method was used to explore the identity of the perceptual information being used in rhythmic movement tasks. In the three conditions, relative position, relative speed, and frequency (variables motivated by the model) were selectively perturbed. Ten participants performed a judgment task to identify 0° or 180° under these perturbation conditions, and 8 participants who had been trained to visually discriminate 90° performed the task with perturbed 90° displays. Discrimination of 0° and 180° was unperturbed in 7 out of the 10 participants, but discrimination of 90° was completely disrupted by the position perturbation and was made noisy by the frequency perturbation. We concluded that (1) the information used by most observers to perceive relative phase at 0° and 180° was relative direction and (2) becoming an expert perceiver of 90° entails learning a new variable composed of position and speed.

Item Type:	Journal Article
Subjects:	B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology
Divisions:	Faculty of Science > Psychology
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH):	Learning, psychology of, Apperception, Perceptual learning
Journal or Publication Title:	Attention, Perception & Psychophysics
Publisher:	Psychonomic Society, Inc.
ISSN:	1943-3921
Date:	October 2007
Volume:	Vol.70
Number:	No.3
Page Range:	pp. 465-476
Identification Number:	10.3758/PP.70.3.465
Status:	Peer Reviewed
Access rights to Published version:	Open Access
References:	Bingham, G. P. (1988). Task specific devices and the perceptual bottleneck. Human Movement Science, 7, 225-264. Bingham, G. P. (2001). A perceptually driven dynamical model of rhythmic limb movement and bimanual coordination. In Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 75-79). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. Bingham, G. P. (2004a). A perceptually driven dynamical model of bimanual rhythmic movement (and phase perception). Ecological Psychology, 16(1), 45-53. Bingham, G. P. (2004b). Another timing variable composed of state variables: Phase perception and phase driven oscillators. In H. Hecht & G. J. P. Savelsbergh (Eds), Advances in Psychology 135: Time-to-Contact. Amsterdam: Elsevier. Bingham, G. P., Schmidt, R. C., & Zaal, F. T. J. M. (1999). Visual perception of relative phasing of human limb movements. Perception & Psychophysics 61, 246-258. Bingham, G. P., Zaal, F. T. J. M., Shull, J. A., & Collins, D. (2001). The effect of frequency on visual perception of relative phase and phase variability of two oscillating objects. Experimental Brain Research, 136, 543-552. Bogaerts, H., Buekers, M. J., Zaal, F. T., & Swinnen, S. P. (2003). When visuo-motor incongruence aids motor performance: the effect of perceiving motion structures during transformed visual feedback on bimanual coordination. Behavioral Brain Research, 138, 45-57. Braunstein, M. L., Hoffman, D. D., & Pollick, F. E. (1990). Discriminating rigid from nonrigid motion: Minimum points and views. Perception & Psychophysics, 47(3), 205-214. Buekers, M. J., Bogaerts, H. P., Swinnen., S. P., & Helsen, W. F. (2000). The synchronization of human arm movements to external events. Neuroscience Letters, 290, 181-18 Fontaine, R. J., Lee, T. D., & Swinnen, S. P. (1997). Learning a new bimanual coordination pattern: Reciprocal influences of intrinsic and to-be-learned patterns. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 51(1), 1-9. Gibson, E. J. (1969). Principles of perceptual learning and development. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts. Gibson, E. J., & Pick, A. D. (2000). An ecological approach to perceptual learning and development. New York: Oxford University Press. Haken, H., Kelso, J. A. S., & Bunz, H. (1985). A theoretical model of phase transitions in human hand movements. Biological Cybernetics, 51(5), 347-356. Jacobs, D. M., & Michaels, C. F. (2001). Individual difference and the use of nonspecifying variables in learning to perceive distance and size: Comments on McConnell, Muchisky, and Bingham (1998). Perception & Psychophysics, 63(3), 563-571. Johansson, G. (1950). Configurations in event perception. Uppsala, Sweden: Almqvist and Wiksell. Kelso, J. A. S., & Zanone, P. G. (2002). Coordination dynamics of learning and transfer across different effector systems. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28(4), 776-797. Mechsner, F., Kerzel, D., Knoblich, G., & Prinz, W. (2001). Perceptual basis of bimanual coordination. Nature, 414, 69-73. Mechsner, F., & Knoblich, G. (2004). Do muscles matter for coordinated action? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 30(3), 490-503. Muchisky, M. M., & Bingham, G. P. (2002). Trajectory forms as a source of information about events. Perception & Psychophysics, 64(1), 15-31. Schmidt, R. C., Carello, C., & Turvey, M. T. (1990). Phase transitions and critical fluctuations in the visual coordination of rhythmic movements between people. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16(2), 227-247. Temprado, J. J., Swinnen, S. P., Carson, R. G., Tourment, A., & Laurent, M. (2003). Interaction of directional, neuromuscular and egocentric constraints on the stability of preferred bimanual coordination patterns. Human Movement Science, 22, 339-363. Wenderoth, N., Bock, O., & Krohn, R. (2002). Learning a new bimanual coordination pattern is influenced by existing attractors. Motor Control, 6, 166-182. Wickelgren, E. & Bingham, G.P. (2001). Infant sensitivity to the trajectory forms. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27(4), 942-952. Wickelgren, E. A., & Bingham, G. P. (2004). Perspective distortion of trajectory forms and perceptual constancy in visual event identification. Perception & Psychophysics, 66(4), 629-641. Wickelgren, E. & Bingham, G.P. (in press). Trajectory forms as information for visual event recognition: 3D perspectives on path shape and speed profile. Perception & Psychophysics. Wilson, A. D., Bingham, G. P. & Craig, J. C. (2003). Proprioceptive perception of phase variability. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29(6), 1179-1190. Wilson, A. D., & Bingham, G. P. (submitted). Improved Perception Leads (Eventually) to Improved Movement Stability. Wilson, A. D., Collins, D. R., & Bingham, G. P. (2005a). Perceptual coupling in rhythmic movement coordination – stable perception leads to stable action. Experimental Brain Research, 164(4), 517-528. Wilson, A. D., Collins, D. R., & Bingham, G. P. (2005b). Human movement coordination implicates relative direction as the information for relative phase. Experimental Brain Research, 165, 351-361. Wimmers, R. H., Beek, P. J., & van Wieringen, P. C. W. (1992). Phase transitions in rhythmic tracking movements: A case of unilateral coupling. Human Movement Science, 11, 217-226. Zaal, F. T. J. M., Bingham, G. P., & Schmidt, R. C. (2000). Visual perception of mean relative phase and phase variability. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 26, 1209–1220. Zanone, P. G., & Kelso, J. A. S. (1992a). Evolution of behavioral attractors with learning: Nonequilibrium phase transitions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18(2), 403-421. Zanone, P. G., & Kelso, J. A. S. (1992b). Learning and transfer as dynamical paradigms for behavioral change. In Tutorials in Motor Behavior II, Advances in Psychology (Stelmach, G., & Requin, J., Eds.). Amsterdam: North-Holland. Zanone, P. G., & Kelso, J. A. S. (1994). The coordination dynamics of learning: Theoretical structure and experimental agenda. In Interlimb Coordination: Neural, Dynamical and Cognitive Constraints (Swinnen, S., Heuer, H., Massion, J., & Casaer, P., Eds.). San Diego, CA; Academic Press. Zanone, P. G., & Kelso, J. A. S. (1997). Coordination dynamics of learning and transfer: Collective and component levels. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23(5), 1454-1480.
URI:	http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/406

Request changes to a record

Actions (login required)

View Item