The Library
When being right is not enough : four-year-olds distinguish knowledgeable informants from merely accurate informants
Tools
Einav, Shiri and Robinson, Elizabeth J.. (2011) When being right is not enough : four-year-olds distinguish knowledgeable informants from merely accurate informants. Psychological Science, Vol.22 (No.10). pp. 1250-1253. ISSN 0956-7976
Full text not available from this repository.
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0956797611416998
Abstract
Recent evidence demonstrates that children are selective in their social learning, preferring to learn from a previously accurate speaker than from a previously inaccurate one. We examined whether children assessing speakers’ reliability take into account how speakers achieved their prior accuracy. In Study 1, when faced with two accurate informants, 4- and 5-year-olds (but not 3-year-olds) were more likely to seek novel information from an informant who had previously given the answers unaided than from an informant who had always relied on help from a third party. Similarly, in Study 2, 4-year-olds were more likely to trust the testimony of an unaided informant over the testimony provided by an assisted informant. Our results indicate that when children reach around 4 years of age, their selective trust extends beyond simple generalizations based on informants’ past accuracy to a more sophisticated selectivity that distinguishes between truly knowledgeable informants and merely accurate informants who may not be reliable in the long term.
| Item Type: | Journal Article |
|---|---|
| Subjects: | B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology |
| Divisions: | Faculty of Science > Psychology |
| Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): | Cognition in children, Testimony (Theory of knowledge), Knowledge, Sociology of, Trust, Child development |
| Journal or Publication Title: | Psychological Science |
| Publisher: | Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd. |
| ISSN: | 0956-7976 |
| Date: | October 2011 |
| Volume: | Vol.22 |
| Number: | No.10 |
| Page Range: | pp. 1250-1253 |
| Identification Number: | 10.1177/0956797611416998 |
| Status: | Peer Reviewed |
| Publication Status: | Published |
| Access rights to Published version: | Restricted or Subscription Access |
| References: | Birch, S. A. J., Vauthier, S. A., & Bloom, P. (2008). Three- and fouryear- olds spontaneously use others’ past performance to guide their learning. Cognition, 107, 1018–1034. Corriveau, K. H., & Harris, P. L. (2009). Choosing your informant: Weighing familiarity and recent accuracy. Developmental Science, 12, 426–437. Csibra, G., & Gergely, G. (2009). Natural pedagogy. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13, 148–153. Einav, S., & Robinson, E. J. (2010). Children’s sensitivity to error magnitude when evaluating informants. Cognitive Development, 25, 218–232. Gopnik, A., & Graf, P. (1988). Knowing how you know: Young children’s ability to identify and remember the sources of their beliefs. Child Development, 59, 1366–1371. Haigh, S. N., & Robinson, E. J. (2009). What children know about the source of their knowledge without reporting it as the source. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 6, 318–336. Jaswal, V. K., & Neely, L. A. (2006). Adults don’t always know best: Preschoolers use past reliability over age when learning new words. Psychological Science, 17, 757–758. Koenig, M. A., Clement, F., & Harris, P. L. (2004). Trust in testimony: Children’s use of true and false statements. Psychological Science, 15, 694–698. Koenig, M. A., & Harris, P. L. (2005). Preschoolers mistrust ignorant and inaccurate speakers. Child Development, 76, 1261–1277. Koenig, M. A., & Woodward, A. L. (2010). Sensitivity of 24-montholds to the prior inaccuracy of the source: Possible mechanisms. Developmental Psychology, 46, 815–826. Lutz, D. J., & Keil, F. C. (2002). Early understanding of the division of cognitive labor. Child Development, 73, 1073–1084. Nurmsoo, E., & Robinson, E. J. (2009a). Children’s trust in previously inaccurate informants who were well or poorly informed: When past errors can be excused. Child Development, 80, 23–27. Nurmsoo, E., & Robinson, E. J. (2009b). Identifying unreliable informants: Do children excuse past inaccuracy? Developmental Science, 12, 41–47. Roberts, K. P., & Blades, M. (Eds.). (2000). Children’s source monitoring. London, England: Erlbaum. Robinson, E. J., Haigh, S. N., & Nurmsoo, E. (2008). Children’s working understanding of knowledge sources: Confidence in knowledge gained from testimony. Cognitive Development, 23, 105–118. Robinson, E. J., & Nurmsoo, E. (2009). When do children learn from unreliable speakers? Cognitive Development, 24, 16–22. Sabbagh, M. A., & Baldwin, D. A. (2001). Learning words from knowledgeable versus ignorant speakers: Links between preschoolers’ theory of mind and semantic development. Child Development, 72, 1054–1070. Sperber, D., Clement, F., Heintz, C., Mascaro, O., Mercier, H., Origgi, G., & Wilson, D. (2010). Epistemic vigilance. Mind & Language, 25, 359–393. |
| URI: | http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/40677 |
Actions (login required)
![]() |
View Item |
Tools
Tools

