Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Statistics
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login

Another step, another direction : a response to Zizek’s ‘Why Heidegger made the right step in 1933

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Beistegui, Miguel de, 1966-. (2007) Another step, another direction : a response to Zizek’s ‘Why Heidegger made the right step in 1933. International Journal of Zizek Studies, Vol.1 (No.4). ISSN 1751-8229

Full text not available from this repository.
Official URL: http://www.zizekstudies.org/index.php/ijzs/article...

Abstract

If, against all odds, and following Žižek’s suggestion, we wish to consider the possibility of turning to Heidegger’s politics, and to his stance with respect to the political, in a manner that is productive, such a possibility can only stem from the radical and revolutionary nature of his thought alone, from the original task that he set for thought. Inasmuch as, like Heidegger himself, Žižek believes there is always more in a thought than its actuality, we are faced with the possibility – and in fact, according to Žižek, the necessity – to repeat the still untapped and politically progressive resources of Heidegger’s thought. However we may wish to identify and present such resources, we must first face the fact that Heidegger’s thought is first and foremost non-political. This doesn’t mean that it is simply a-political, or without any political relevance whatsoever. Rather, it means that everything Heidegger says about politics, or that can be seen to resonate with our political situation, is articulated from a position or a space that is itself not political, a space that, furthermore, defines and decides the essence of politics. Everything that Heidegger says on politics amounts to calling it into question, that is, our investment in it, and the assumptions that govern it.

Item Type: Journal Article
Subjects: B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > B Philosophy (General)
Divisions: Faculty of Social Sciences > Philosophy
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): Žižek, Slavoj -- Criticism and interpretation, Heidegger, Martin, 1889-1976 -- Criticism and interpretation, Power (Social sciences), Political science -- Philosophy
Journal or Publication Title: International Journal of Zizek Studies
Publisher: University of Leeds * Institute of Communications Studies
ISSN: 1751-8229
Date: 2007
Volume: Vol.1
Number: No.4
Status: Peer Reviewed
Publication Status: Published
URI: http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/40944

Request changes to a record

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item
twitter

Email us: publications@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us