Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Statistics
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login

Why are survey forecasts superior to model forecasts?

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Clements, Michael P. (2010) Why are survey forecasts superior to model forecasts? Working Paper. Coventry: University of Warwick. Dept. of Economics. (Warwick economics research paper series (TWERPS), Vol.2010).

[img]
Preview
PDF
Clements_twerp_954.pdf - Other - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader

Download (427Kb)
Official URL: http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/economics/resear...

Abstract

We investigate two characteristics of survey forecasts that are shown to contribute to their superiority over purely model-based forecasts. These are that the consensus forecasts incorporate the effects of perceived changes in the long-run outlook, as well as embodying departures from the path toward the long-run expectation. Both characteristics on average tend to enhance forecast accuracy. At the level of the individual forecasts, there is scant evidence that the second characteristic enhances forecast accuracy, and the average accuracy of the individual forecasts can be improved by applying a mechanical correction.

Item Type: Working or Discussion Paper (Working Paper)
Subjects: H Social Sciences > HB Economic Theory
Divisions: Faculty of Social Sciences > Economics
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): Economic forecasting, Economic surveys
Series Name: Warwick economics research paper series (TWERPS)
Publisher: University of Warwick. Dept. of Economics
Place of Publication: Coventry
Date: 2010
Volume: Vol.2010
Number: No.954
Status: Not Peer Reviewed
Publication Status: Published
Access rights to Published version: Open Access
References: Ang, A., Bekaert, G., and Wei, M. (2007). Do macro variables, asset markets, or surveys forecast inflation better?. Journal of Monetary Economics, 54, 1163-1212. Bonham, C., and Cohen, R. (2001). To aggregate, pool, or neither: Testing the rational expectations hypothesis using survey data. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 190, 278-291. Clark, T. E., and McCracken, M. W. (2008). Forecasting with small macroeconomic VARs in the presence of instabilities. In Rapach, D. E., and Wohar, M. E. (eds.), Forecasting in the Pres- ence of Structural Breaks and Model Uncertainty. Frontiers of Economics and Globalization. Volume 3, pp. 93-147: Emerald. Clements, M. P., and Galvão, A. B. (2008). Macroeconomic forecasting with mixed-frequency data: Forecasting output growth in the United States. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 26, 546-554. No. 4. Clements, M. P., and Hendry, D. F. (2006). Forecasting with breaks. In Elliott, G., Granger, C., and Timmermann, A. (eds.), Handbook of Economic Forecasting, Volume 1. Handbook of Economics 24, pp. 605-657: Elsevier, Horth-Holland. Croushore, D. (1993). Introducing: The Survey of Professional Forecasters. Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia Business Review, November/December, 3-13. Croushore, D., and Stark, T. (2001). A real-time data set for macroeconomists. Journal of Econo- metrics, 105, 111-130. Davies, A., and Lahiri, K. (1995). A new framework for analyzing survey forecasts using three- dimensional panel data. Journal of Econometrics, 68, 205-227. Keane, M. P., and Runkle, D. E. (1990). Testing the rationality of price forecasts: new evidence from panel data. American Economic Review, 80, 714-735. Landefeld, J. S., Seskin, E. P., and Fraumeni, B. M. (2008). Taking the pulse of the economy. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 22, 193-216. Montgomery, A. L., Zarnowitz, V., Tsay, R. S., and Tiao, G. C. (1998). Forecasting the U.S. unemployment rate. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 93, 478-493. Romer, C. D., and Romer, D. H. (2000). Federal Reserve information and the behaviour of interest rates. American Economic Review, 90, 429-457. Stock, J. H., and Watson, M. W. (2008). Phillips Curve Inflation Forecasts. Working paper 14322, NBER, Cambridge, MA. Zarnowitz, V. (1969). The new ASA-NBER Survey of Forecasts by Economic Statisticians. The American Statistician, 23, No. 1, 12-16. Zarnowitz, V., and Braun, P. (1993). Twenty-two years of the NBER-ASA quarterly economic out- look surveys: aspects and comparisons of forecasting performance. In Stock, J., and Watson, M. (eds.), Business Cycles, Indicators, and Forecasting, pp. 11-84: Chicago: University of Chicago Press and NBER.
URI: http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/41096

Request changes to a record

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Document Downloads

More statistics for this item...
twitter

Email us: publications@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us