Tildesley, Michael J., Volkova, Victoriya and Woolhouse, M. E. J. (Mark E. J.). (2011) Potential for epidemic take-off from the primary outbreak farm via livestock movements. BMC Veterinary Research, Vol.7 (No.1). p. 76. ISSN 1746-6148

Preview

PDF WRAP_Tildesley_1746-6148-7-76.pdf - Published Version - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader Download (1040Kb)

Abstract

Background We consider the potential for infection to spread in a farm population from the primary outbreak farm via livestock movements prior to disease detection. We analyse how this depends on the time of the year infection occurs, the species transmitting, the length of infectious period on the primary outbreak farm, location of the primary outbreak, and whether a livestock market becomes involved. We consider short infectious periods of 1 week, 2 weeks and 4 weeks, characteristic of acute contagious livestock diseases. The analysis is based on farms in Scotland from 1 January 2003 to 31 July 2007. Results The proportion of primary outbreaks from which an acute contagious disease would spread via movement of livestock is generally low, but exhibits distinct annual cyclicity with peaks in May and August. The distance that livestock are moved varies similarly: at the time of the year when the potential for spread via movements is highest, the geographical spread via movements is largest. The seasonal patterns for cattle differ from those for sheep whilst there is no obvious seasonality for pigs. When spread via movements does occur, there is a high risk of infection reaching a livestock market; infection of markets can amplify disease spread. The proportion of primary outbreaks that would spread infection via livestock movements varies significantly between geographical regions. Conclusions In this paper we introduce a set-up for analysis of movement data that allows for a generalized assessment of the risk associated with infection spreading from a primary outbreak farm via livestock movements, applying this to Scotland, we assess how this risk depends upon the time of the year, species transmitting, location of the farm and other factors.

[error in script] [error in script]

Item Type:	Journal Article
Subjects:	S Agriculture > SF Animal culture
Divisions:	Faculty of Science > Centre for Complexity Science Faculty of Science > Mathematics
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH):	Communicable diseases in animals -- Transmission, Livestock -- Diseases -- Epidemiology
Journal or Publication Title:	BMC Veterinary Research
Publisher:	Bio Med Central
ISSN:	1746-6148
Date:	24 November 2011
Volume:	Vol.7
Number:	No.1
Page Range:	p. 76
Identification Number:	10.1186/1746-6148-7-76
Status:	Peer Reviewed
Publication Status:	Published
Access rights to Published version:	Open Access
Funder:	Scotland, Wellcome Trust (London, England), United States. Dept. of Homeland Security. Science and Technology Directorate
Grant number:	ST-108-000017 (STD)
References:	1. Vernon MC, Webb CR, Heath MF: Postal survey of contacts between cattle farms on the Isle of Lewis. Vet Rec 2010, 166(2):37-40. 2. Sanson RL, Struthers G, King P, Weston JF, Morris RS: The potential extent of transmission of foot-and-mouth disease: a study of the movement of animals and materials in Southland, New Zealand. N Z Vet J 1993, 41(1):21-28. 3. Brennan ML, Kemp R, Christley RM: Direct and indirect contacts between cattle farms in north-west England. Prev Vet Med 2008, 84(3-4):242-260. 4. Ribbens S, Dewulf J, Koenen F, Mintiens K, de Kruif A, Maes D: Type and frequency of contacts between Belgian pig herds. Prev Vet Med 2009, 88(1):57-66. 5. Stegeman JA, Elbers ARW, Bouma A, de Jong MCM: Rate of inter-herd transmission of classical swine fever virus by different types of contact during the 1997-8 epidemic in The Netherlands. Epidemiol Infect 2002, 128(2):285-291. 6. Ortiz-Pelaez A, Pfeiffer DU, Soares-Magalhaes RJ, Guitian FJ: Use of social network analysis to characterize the pattern of animal movements in the initial phases of the 2001 foot and mouth disease (FMD) epidemic in the UK. Prev Vet Med 2006, 76(1-2):40-55. 7. Gibbens JC, Sharpe CE, Wilesmith JW, Mansley LM, Michalopoulou E, Ryan JB, Hudson M: Descriptive epidemiology of the 2001 foot-andmouth disease epidemic in Great Britain: the first five months. Vet Rec 2001, 149(24):729-743. 8. Elbers ARW, Stegeman A, Moser H, Ekker HM, Smak JA, Pluimers FH: The classical swine fever epidemic 1997-1998 in the Netherlands: descriptive epidemiology. Prev Vet Med 1999, 42(3-4):157-184. 9. Robinson SE, Everett MG, Christley RM: Recent network evolution increases the potential for large epidemics in the British cattle population. J R Soc Interface 2007, 4(15):669-674. 10. Kao RR, Danon L, Green DM, Kiss IZ: Demographic structure and pathogen dynamics on the network of livestock movements in Great Britain. Proc R Soc B 2006, 273(1597):1999-2007. 11. Tildesley MJ, Keeling MJ: Is R(0) a good predictor of final epidemic size: foot-and-mouth disease in the UK. Journal of theoretical biology 2009, 258(4):623-629. 12. Green DM, Kiss IZ, Kao RR: Modelling the initial spread of foot-and-mouth disease through animal movements. Proc R Soc B 2006, 273(1602):2729-2735. 13. McLaws M, Ribble C: Description of recent foot and mouth disease outbreaks in nonendemic areas: Exploring the relationship between early detection and epidemic size. Can Vet J 2007, 48(10):1051-1062. 14. Boender GJ, Nodelijk G, Hagenaars TJ, Elbers ARW, de Jong MCM: Local spread of classical swine fever upon virus introduction into The Netherlands: Mapping of areas at high risk. BMC Vet Res 2008, 4. 15. Savill NJ, Shaw DJ, Deardon R, Tildesley MJ, Keeling MJ, Woolhouse ME, Brooks SP, Grenfell BT: Topographic determinants of foot and mouth disease transmission in the UK 2001 epidemic. BMC Vet Res 2006, 2:3. 16. Kiss IZ, Green DM, Kao RR: The network of sheep movements within Great Britain: Network properties and their implications for infectious disease spread. J R Soc Interface 2006, 3(10):669-677. 17. Mitchell A, Bourn D, Mawdsley J, Wint W, Clifton-Hadley R, Gilbert M: Characteristics of cattle movements in Britain - an analysis of records from the Cattle Tracing System. Anim Sci 2005, 80:265-273. 18. Robinson SE, Christley RM: Identifying temporal variation in reported births, deaths and movements of cattle in Britain. BMC Vet Res 2006, 2:11. 19. Scudamore J, Ross J: A review of the Scottish response to the recent foot and mouth disease outbreak and identification of lessons for the future, particularly in terms of reducing the risk to Scotland and the associated economic disruption. 2008 [http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Publications/2008/ 06/23130049/0], ISBN 9780755958092. 20. Volkova VV, Bessell PR, Woolhouse ME, Savill NJ: The evaluation of risks of FMD in Scotland to assist with decision-making during the UK 2007 FMD outbreak. Vet Rec 2011, 169(124). 21. Robinson SE, Christley RM: Exploring the role of auction markets in cattle movements within Great Britain. Prev Vet Med 2007, 81(1-3):21-37. 22. Lindstrom T, Sisson SA, Lewerin SS, Wennergren U: Estimating animal movement contacts between holdings of different production types. Prev Vet Med 2010, 95(1-2):23-31. 23. Carlyle WJ: Distribution of Store Sheep from Markets in Scotland. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 1978, 3(2):226-245. 24. Volkova V, Savill NJ, Bessell PR, Woolhouse MEJ: Report on seasonality of movements and spatial distribution of sheep, cattle and pigs in Scotland. Report to Animal Health and Welfare Division of the Scottish Government’s Rural and Environment Research and Analysis Directorate. 2008, ISBN 978 970 7559 1718 7551. 25. Green DM, Kao RR: Data quality of the Cattle Tracing System in Great Britain. Vet Rec 2007, 161(13):439-443. 26. Bigras-Poulin M, Thompson RA, Chriel M, Mortensen S, Greiner M: Network analysis of Danish cattle industry trade patterns as an evaluation of risk potential for disease spread. Prev Vet Med 2006, 76(1-2):11-39. 27. Sanson RL: A survey to investigate movements off sheep and cattle farms in New Zealand, with reference to the potential transmission of foot-and-mouth disease. N Z Vet J 2005, 53(4):223-233. 28. Noremark M, Hakansson N, Lindstrom T, Wennergren U, Lewerin SS: Spatial and temporal investigations of reported movements, births and deaths of cattle and pigs in Sweden. Acta Vet Scand 2009, 51:37. 29. Natale F, Giovannini A, Savini L, Palma D, Possenti L, Fiore G, Calistri P: Network analysis of Italian cattle trade patterns and evaluation of risks for potential disease spread. Prev Vet Med 2009, 92(4):341-350. 30. Bigras-Poulin M, Barfod K, Mortensen S, Greiner M: Relationship of trade patterns of the Danish swine industry animal movements network to potential disease spread. Prev Vet Med 2007, 80(2-3):143-165. 31. Kao R, O’Reilly K, Bronsvoort B, Handel I, Zadoks R, Willoughby K, Milne C, Gunn G: Assessing the additional risk of FMD transmission from using field lairages at Scottish livestock markets. Report to Animal Health and Welfare Division of the Scottish Government’s Rural and Environment Research and Analysis Directorate 2008. 32. Thomson S: Foot and mouth disease review: Structure of the Scottish livestock industry. Special study report for The Scottish Government’s Rural and Environment Research and Analysis Directorate 2008, ISBN 978 970 7559 1739 7556.
URI:	http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/41143

Request changes to a record

Actions (login required)

View Item