In-reach specialist nursing teams for residential care homes : uptake of services, impact on care provision and cost-effectiveness
Szczepura, Ala, Nelson, S. (Sara) and Wild, Deidre. (2008) In-reach specialist nursing teams for residential care homes : uptake of services, impact on care provision and cost-effectiveness. BMC Health Services Research, Vol.8 (No.269). ISSN 1472-6963
WRAP_Szczepura_1472_6963_8_269.pdf - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-8-269
Background: A joint NHS-Local Authority initiative in England designed to provide a dedicated nursing and physiotherapy in-reach team (IRT) to four residential care homes has been evaluated.The IRT supported 131 residents and maintained 15 'virtual' beds for specialist nursing in these care homes.
Methods: Data captured prospectively (July 2005 to June 2007) included: numbers of referrals; reason for referral; outcome (e.g. admission to IRT bed, short-term IRT support); length of stay in IRT; prevented hospital admissions; early hospital discharges; avoided nursing home transfers; and detection of unrecognised illnesses. An economic analysis was undertaken.
Results: 733 referrals were made during the 2 years (range 0.5 to 13.0 per resident per annum)resulting in a total of 6,528 visits. Two thirds of referrals aimed at maintaining the resident's independence in the care home. According to expert panel assessment, 197 hospital admissions were averted over the period; 20 early discharges facilitated; and 28 resident transfers to a nursing home prevented. Detection of previously unrecognised illnesses accounted for a high number of visits. Investment in IRT equalled £44.38 per resident per week. Savings through reduced hospital admissions, early discharges, delayed transfers to nursing homes, and identification of previously
unrecognised illnesses are conservatively estimated to produce a final reduction in care cost of £6.33 per resident per week. A sensitivity analysis indicates this figure might range from a weekly overall saving of £36.90 per resident to a 'worst case' estimate of £2.70 extra expenditure per resident per week.
Evaluation early in implementation may underestimate some cost-saving activities and greater savings may emerge over a longer time period. Similarly, IRT costs may reduce over time due to the potential for refinement of team without major loss in effectiveness.
Conclusion: Introduction of a specialist nursing in-reach team for residential homes is at least cost neutral and, in all probability, cost saving. Further benefits include development of new skills in the care home workforce and enhanced quality of care. Residents are enabled to stay in familiar surroundings rather than unnecessarily spending time in hospital or being transferred to a higher
dependency nursing home setting.
|Item Type:||Journal Article|
|Subjects:||R Medicine > R Medicine (General)
H Social Sciences > HV Social pathology. Social and public welfare
|Divisions:||Faculty of Medicine > Warwick Medical School > Clinical Sciences Research Institute (CSRI)
Faculty of Medicine > Warwick Medical School > Health Sciences
Faculty of Medicine > Warwick Medical School
|Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH):||Geriatric nursing, Residential care -- Research, Older people -- Institutional care -- Great Britain, Cost effectivenss|
|Journal or Publication Title:||BMC Health Services Research|
|Publisher:||BioMed Central Ltd.|
|Official Date:||22 December 2008|
|Number of Pages:||15|
|Access rights to Published version:||Open Access|
|Funder:||Great Britain. Office of the Deputy Prime Minister, Joseph Rowntree Foundation (JRF)|
1. Royal Commission on Long Term Care: With respect to old age: Long
Actions (login required)