Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login
  • Admin

Public participation : comparing approaches

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

French, Simon and Bayley, C. (2011) Public participation : comparing approaches. Journal of Risk Research, Vol.14 (No.2). pp. 241-257. doi:10.1080/13669877.2010.515316

Research output not available from this repository, contact author.
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2010.515316

Request Changes to record.

Abstract

Public participation in societal decision‐making is becoming more and more common. There have been numerous studies asserting the benefits of involving citizens and stakeholders in decision‐making at various levels in government and regulation. However, as several writers have noted, there have been few comparative studies demonstrating the relative advantages and disadvantages of different participation instruments. In this paper, we report a small series of experiments that seek to compare the efficacy of a few methods in a variety of circumstances. We argue that, although such experiments provide indications of the relative merits of participation instruments, a much more substantial and co‐ordinated programme is needed. We suggest two components of this programme: first, the development of a public domain knowledge base in which researchers can share, discuss and document their experiences within a common framework that will allow better comparisons; second, a programme of action research in which comparative experiments are attached to ‘live’ participation exercises on contemporary issues.

Item Type: Journal Article
Subjects: H Social Sciences > HD Industries. Land use. Labor > HD28 Management. Industrial Management
Divisions: Faculty of Science > Statistics
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): Risk assessment, Social responsibility of business, Decision making -- Citizen participation, Deliberative democracy
Journal or Publication Title: Journal of Risk Research
Publisher: Routledge
ISSN: 1366-9877
Official Date: 2011
Dates:
DateEvent
2011Published
Volume: Vol.14
Number: No.2
Page Range: pp. 241-257
DOI: 10.1080/13669877.2010.515316
Status: Peer Reviewed
Publication Status: Published
Access rights to Published version: Restricted or Subscription Access
Funder: Rural Economy and Land Use Programme (RELU), Economic and Social Research Council (Great Britain) (ESRC), Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (Great Britain) (BBSRC), Natural Environment Research Council (Great Britain) (NERC), Great Britain. Dept. for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs (DEFRA), Scotland. Environment and Rural Affairs Dept. (SEERAD)

Request changes or add full text files to a record

Repository staff actions (login required)

View Item View Item
twitter

Email us: wrap@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us