Labour and the arts : managing transformation?
Doustaly, Cécile and Gray, Clive. (2010) Labour and the arts : managing transformation? Observatoire de la société britannique, Vol.2010 (No.8). pp. 319-338.
WRAP_Gray_240212-1_doustalygray_def.pdf - Published Version - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
RE_Copyright_policy_of_your_article__Labour_and_the_Arts__Managing_Transformation_.htm - Other
Restricted to Repository staff only
Official URL: http://osb.revues.org/953
Public support for the arts in England as introduced in 1945 was already atypical in many ways since it operated through an arm's lengthbody and left an important role to the private and voluntary sectors. The adoption of New Public Management (NPM) did not mean a total overhaul of the system, but meant that the State took back some power of decision and control through a specialized Department, created originally in 1992. This Department has asked funding bodies to adopt new management methods which are aimed at their beneficiaries as well... Attempts have also been made to formalise and modify local government support for the arts. The implementation of NPM to the arts sector proved to be complex. The assessment criteria that were adopted were criticized by most administrators and artists alike for being inadequate and simplistic when applied to this sector. The effectiveness of the new framework is assessed in the context of the recent growing support for public spending in the arts from a traditionally sceptical public. The new management, accompanied by budget increases, has led to an instrumentalisation of the arts sector through attachment and this can be equated more generally with a trend towards the commodification of the arts.
|Item Type:||Journal Article|
|Subjects:||C Auxiliary Sciences of History > CB History of civilization
N Fine Arts > NX Arts in general
|Divisions:||Faculty of Arts > Theatre, Performance and Cultural Policy Studies > Centre for Cultural Policy Studies|
|Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH):||Great Britain -- Cultural policy -- History -- 20th century, Art and state -- Great Britain -- History -- 20th century, Arts -- Management, Public administration -- Great Britain -- History -- 20th century, Arts Council of England|
|Journal or Publication Title:||Observatoire de la société britannique|
|Publisher:||University of South Toulon-Var|
|Book Title:||Nouvelle gestion publique et réforme des services publics sous le New Labour|
|Editor:||Kober-Smith, Anémone and Leydier, Gilles and Sowels, Nicholas|
|Page Range:||pp. 319-338|
|Status:||Not Peer Reviewed|
|Access rights to Published version:||Restricted or Subscription Access|
|References:||ACE (Arts Council England), Arts Council Organisation Review, Briefing note, 14/07/2009. ACE, Participatory Budgeting and the Arts, June 2009. ACE/A. Davey, Review of Arts Council England’s regularly funded organisations investment strategy – lessons learned, 2008. ACE/Baroness G. McIntosh, A review of Arts Council England’s Regularly Funded Organisations Investment Strategy, 2007/08. ACE, Spending review 2007, Information for regularly funded organisations, Sum-mary of our response to the CSR, London : ACE, 2007. ACE, Peer Review Action Plan, 2006. ACE/Baroness G. McIntosh, Arts Council Peer Review Report, 2005. ACE/Local Government Association, Local Government and the Arts, A vision for Partnership, 2003. ACE, 2003 Annual Review, 2003. Audit Commission, Key Lines of Enquiry: Culture and Leisure, 2005. Bezes, P., « Le Renouveau du Contrôle des Bureaucraties : L‘Impact du New Public Management », Informations Sociales, n°126, 2005/06, pp. 26-37. Commons Committee of Public Accounts, Making grants efficiently in the culture, media and sport sector, 49th Report of Session, 2007–08. DCLG (Department for Communities and Local Government), LAA Annual Review 2008/09, September 2008. DCLG, LAA negotiations in 2008, Lessons Learnt, September 2008. DCLG, Communities in Control: Real People, Real Power, 2008. DCLG, Roles and Responsibilities in the Local Performance Framework, 2008. DCLG, Strong and Prosperous Communities, 2006. DCMS (Department of Culture, Media and Sports), 2009 Report, 2009. DCMS/other partners, A Passion for Excellence : an Improvement Strategy for Culture and Sport, 2008. DCMS/Sir B. McMaster, Supporting Excellence in the Arts : from Measure-ment to Judgement, January 2008. DCMS, Regional Cultural Consortiums, London, DCMS, 1999. DCMS, Creating opportunities. Guidance for Local Authorities in England on Lo-cal Cultural Strategies, 1999. Doustaly C., - « Le rôle de la culture dans la renaissance urbaine depuis 1997 en An-gleterre : de l‘économique au socioculturel ? », in S. Nail, D. Fée (dir.), Vers une renaissance urbaine britannique ? Dix ans de politique travailliste de la ville, Paris : Presses de la Sorbonne Nouvelle, 2008, pp. 75-95. - « Les politiques de soutien à l‘art en Angleterre depuis 1990 : "excep-tion britannique", dirigisme ou modèle hybride ? », Revue LISA/LISA e-journal, vol. V, n° 1, Caen : Université de Caen, 2007, pp. 6-32. - « La décentralisation des politiques culturelles en Angleterre », Revue Française de Civilisation Britannique, vol. 13, n° 2, Paris : Presses de la Sor-bonne Nouvelle, printemps 2005, pp. 67-82. Gray, C., - The Politics of the Arts in Britain, Basingstoke, Macmillan, 2000. - ―Local Government and the Arts‖, Local Government Studies, vol. 28, n° 1, 2002, pp. 77-90. - ―Commodification and Instrumentalisation in Cultural Policy‖, Interna-tional Journal of Cultural Policy, vol. 13, 2007, pp. 203-215 - ―Instrumental Policies: Causes, Consequences, Museums and Galler-ies‖, Cultural Trends, vol. 17, n° 4, 2008, pp. 209-222. - ―Managing Culture: Pitfalls and Prospects‖, Public Administration, vol. 87, 2009, pp. 574-585. Hoggett, P., ―New Modes of Control in the Public Service‖, Public Ad-ministration, vol. 74, n°1, 1996, pp. 9-32. Hood, C., ―A Public Management for All Seasons‖, Public Administration, vol. 69, Spring 1991, pp. 3-19. Hood, C., ―Doing public management the egalitarian way ?‖, The Art of the State, Culture, Rhetoric and Public Management, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1998. Hood, C.; Scott, C., James, O., Jones, G., T. Travers, Regulation inside Government Waste-Watchers, Quality, Police and Sleaze Busters, Oxford: Ox-ford University Press, 1999. Hutchison, R., The Politics of the Arts Council, London: Sinclair Browne, 1982. Ling, T., ―Delivering Joined-Up Government in the UK‖, Public Admin-istration, vol. 80, 2002, pp. 615-642. Mirza, M. (ed.), Culture Vultures, London : Policy Exchange, 2007. National Association of Local Government Arts Officers, Local Authori-ty Arts Spending Survey 2008, 2008. NCA (National Campaign for the arts), ―NCA Funding Delegation, Concerns and Recommendations”, April 2002. NCA, briefing paper, ―What is the potential impact of the improvement targets on the arts ?‖, 2009. Newman, A., McLean F., ―Presumption, Policy and Practice: the Use of Museums and Galleries as Agents of Social Inclusion‖, International Jour-nal of Cultural Policy, vol. 10, 2004, pp. 167-181. Pierre, J., Peters, B., Governance, Politics and the State, Basingstoke: Macmil-lan, 2000. Pollitt, C., ―Joined-Up Government: A Survey‖, Political Studies Review, vol. 1, 2003, pp. 34-49. Roodhouse, S., Cultural Quarters: Principles and Practice, Bristol: Intellect Books, 2006. Sinclair, A., Arts and Cultures: The History of the 50 Years of the Arts Council of Great Britain, London: Sinclair-Stevenson, 1995. Stoker G., Transforming Local Governance, from Thatcherism to New Labour, Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2004. Taylor, A., ‗‖Arm‘s-length But Hands On‖: Mapping the New Govern-ance‘, Public Administration, vol. 75, 1997, pp. 441-466.|
Actions (login required)