The Library

Modelling bounded health scores with censored skew-normal distributions

Tools

Hutton, Jane (Statistician) and Stanghellini, E.. (2011) Modelling bounded health scores with censored skew-normal distributions. Statistics in Medicine, Volume 30 (Number 4). pp. 368-376. ISSN 0277-6715

Full text not available from this repository.

Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/sim.4104

Abstract

Health care interventions that use quality of life or health scores often provide data which are skewed and bounded. The scores are typically formed by adding up numerical responses to a number of questions. Different questions might have different weights, but the scores will be bounded, and are often scaled to the range 0-100. If improvement in health over time is measured, scores will tend to cluster near the 'healthy' or 'good' boundary as time progresses, leading to a skew distribution. Further, some patients will drop-out as time progresses, hence the scores reflect a selected population.

We fit models based on the skew-normal distribution to data from a randomized controlled trial of treatments for sprained ankles, in which scores were recorded at baseline and at 1, 3 and 9 months after injury. We consider the extent to which skewness in the data can be explained by clustering at the boundary via a comparison between a censored normal and a censored skew-normal model.

As this analysis is based on the complete data only, a formula for the bias of the treatment effects due to informative drop-out is given. This allows us to assess under what conditions the conclusions drawn from the complete data might be either reinforced or reversed, when the informative drop-out process is taken into account. Copyright (C) 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Item Type:

Journal Article

Subjects:

Q Science > QA Mathematics
R Medicine > RA Public aspects of medicine

Divisions:

Faculty of Science > Statistics

Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH):

Health status indicators -- Statistical methods, Quality of life -- Statistical methods, Health surveys -- Statistical methods

Journal or Publication Title:

Statistics in Medicine

Publisher:

John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

ISSN:

0277-6715

Official Date:

20 February 2011

Dates:

Date	Event
20 February 2011	Published

Volume:

Volume 30

Number:

Number 4

Page Range:

pp. 368-376

Identification Number:

10.1002/sim.4104

Status:

Peer Reviewed

Publication Status:

Published

Access rights to Published version:

Restricted or Subscription Access

Funder:

Great Britain. Department of Health, Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC), Italy. Ministero dell'istruzione, dell'università e della ricerca

Grant number:

01/14/10 (DoH), 2007XECZ7L_003 (MUIR)

References:

1. Azzalini A, Capitanio A. Statistical applications of the multivariate skew-normal distribution. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society,
Series B 1999; 61:579--602.
2. Skinner CJ. Discussion on ‘Informative drop-out in longitudinal data analysis’ by Diggle PJ and Kenward MG. Applied Statistics 1994;
43:76--77. 3. Lamb SE, Marsh JL, Hutton JL, Nakash RA, Cooke MW. Mechanical supports for acute, severe ankle sprains: a pragmatic, multi-centre,
randomised controlled trial. The Lancet 2009; 373:575--581.
4. Nakash RA, Hutton JL, Lamb SE, Gates S, Fisher J. Response and non-response to postal questionnaire follow-up in a clinical trial—a
qualitative study of the patient’s perspective. BMC Medical Research Methodology 2008; 14:226--235.
5. Tennant R, Hiller L, Fishwick R, Platt S, Joseph S, Weich S, Parkinson J, Secker J, Stewart-Brown SL. The Warwick–Edinburgh mental
well-being scale (WEMWBS): development and U.K. validation. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes 2007; 5:63--63.
6. Wetherill GB. Intermediate Statistical Methods. Chapman & Hall: London, 1981.
7. Healy MJR. Multivariate normal plotting. Applied Statistics 1968; 17:157--161.
8. Heckman JJ. Sample bias as a specification error. Econometrica 1979; 47:153--161.
9. Copas JB, Li HG. Inference for non-random samples (with Discussion). Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B 1997; 59:55--95.
10. Wooldridge JM. Econometrics Analysis of Cross Section and Panel data. MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, U.S.A., 2003.
11. Marchetti GM, Stanghellini E. A note on distortions induced by truncation, with application to linear regression systems. Statistics and
Probability Letters 2008; 78:824--829.
12. Goldberger AS. Linear regression after selection. Journal of Econometrics 1981; 15:357--366.
13. Diggle PJ, Kenward MG. Informative drop-out in longitudinal data analysis. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series C 1994;
43:49--93.