Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Statistics
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login

Modelling bounded health scores with censored skew-normal distributions

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Hutton, Jane L. and Stanghellini, E.. (2011) Modelling bounded health scores with censored skew-normal distributions. Statistics in Medicine, Vol.30 (No.4). pp. 368-376. ISSN 0277-6715

Full text not available from this repository.
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/sim.4104

Abstract

Health care interventions that use quality of life or health scores often provide data which are skewed and bounded. The scores are typically formed by adding up numerical responses to a number of questions. Different questions might have different weights, but the scores will be bounded, and are often scaled to the range 0-100. If improvement in health over time is measured, scores will tend to cluster near the 'healthy' or 'good' boundary as time progresses, leading to a skew distribution. Further, some patients will drop-out as time progresses, hence the scores reflect a selected population. We fit models based on the skew-normal distribution to data from a randomized controlled trial of treatments for sprained ankles, in which scores were recorded at baseline and at 1, 3 and 9 months after injury. We consider the extent to which skewness in the data can be explained by clustering at the boundary via a comparison between a censored normal and a censored skew-normal model. As this analysis is based on the complete data only, a formula for the bias of the treatment effects due to informative drop-out is given. This allows us to assess under what conditions the conclusions drawn from the complete data might be either reinforced or reversed, when the informative drop-out process is taken into account. Copyright (C) 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Item Type: Journal Article
Subjects: H Social Sciences > HA Statistics
Divisions: Faculty of Science > Statistics
Journal or Publication Title: Statistics in Medicine
Publisher: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
ISSN: 0277-6715
Date: 20 February 2011
Volume: Vol.30
Number: No.4
Page Range: pp. 368-376
Identification Number: 10.1002/sim.4104
Status: Peer Reviewed
Publication Status: Published
Access rights to Published version: Restricted or Subscription Access
Funder: U.K. Department of Health, Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC), MIUR
Grant number: DoH (01/14/10), MIUR (2007XECZ7L_003)
URI: http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/41509

Data sourced from Thomson Reuters' Web of Knowledge

Request changes to a record

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item
twitter

Email us: publications@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us