Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Statistics
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login

Development and the interaction of enforcement institutions

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Dhillon, Amrita and Rigolini, Jamele. (2011) Development and the interaction of enforcement institutions. Journal of Public Economics, Vol.95 (No.1-2). pp. 79-87. ISSN 0047-2727

This is the latest version of this item.

Full text not available from this repository.
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2010.09.013

Abstract

We examine how formal and informal contract enforcing institutions interact in a competitive market with asymmetric information where consumers do not observe quality before purchase. Firm level incentives for producing high quality can be achieved with an informal enforcement mechanism, reputation, the efficacy of which is enhanced by consumers investing in "connectedness:" or with a formal mechanism, legal enforcement, the effectiveness of which can be reduced by means of bribes. We show that formal and informal enforcement mechanisms do not necessarily substitute each other: while high levels of judicial efficiency decrease consumers' incentives to connect, higher consumers' connectedness leads to higher levels of judicial efficiency. We then look at how the equilibrium institutional mix evolves with the level of development. In doing so we show the presence of a new, physical, channel that can affect institutions-i.e. the frequency of bad productivity shocks that, in less developed settings, can impact on firms' incentives to cheat. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Item Type: Journal Article
Subjects: H Social Sciences > HF Commerce
Divisions: Faculty of Social Sciences > Economics
Series Name: Warwick economic research papers
Journal or Publication Title: Journal of Public Economics
Publisher: Elsevier
Place of Publication: Coventry
ISSN: 0047-2727
Date: February 2011
Volume: Vol.95
Number: No.1-2
Page Range: pp. 79-87
Identification Number: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2010.09.013
Status: Peer Reviewed
Publication Status: Published
Access rights to Published version: Restricted or Subscription Access
URI: http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/41729

Data sourced from Thomson Reuters' Web of Knowledge

Request changes to a record

Available Versions of this Item

  • Development and the interaction of enforcement institutions. (deposited 11 Sep 2009 13:53)
    • Development and the interaction of enforcement institutions. (deposited 14 Feb 2012 15:31) [Currently Displayed]

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item
twitter

Email us: publications@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us